-
Available Subscriptions
Covid-19 and Racing
262 topics in this forum
-
- 11 replies
- 784 views
-
- 79 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 28 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 850 views
-
- 12 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- Journalists
FDA votes against boosters
-
- Journalists
- 6 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 591 views
-
- 1 reply
- 576 views
-
- 11 replies
- 756 views
-
- 3 replies
- 875 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 16 replies
- 871 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 489 views
-
-
- 2 replies
- 768 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
- 1 reply
- 678 views
-
- Journalists
Vaccination rates – some thoughts on modelling
-
- Journalists
- 4 replies
- 568 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.3k views
-
-
- Journalists
- 1 reply
- 473 views
-
-
- Journalists
Notes on Covid vaccines in young people
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 897 views
-
- 0 replies
- 378 views
-
- 3 replies
- 552 views
-
- 0 replies
- 772 views
-
- Journalists
Vaccine targets no use in Covid-19 policy
-
- Journalists
- 1 reply
- 638 views
-
- 0 replies
- 593 views
-
- 0 replies
- 26.6k views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Gamma, so $1k in the 1980’s is not the same as $1k in 2025, The TAB will not let some punters back on at reduced odds at all, full stop! You say that some get preferential treatment for big bets? I want to put big bets on, but they wont allow that to occur, and yet OTG are allowed anything!!! Wouldn't think I have lived under any rock, just believe that treating people differently by the NZ TAB and rubbing it in our faces is rather very poor form! It needs to be exposed the way they operate, as I dont know any other business that is allowed to operate in this manner in NZ! -
Yes apparently this was the case, terrible luck on all fronts. -
yes it is. $1,000 is a big bet. always has been. I came to Australia from NZ in the 80's and the limits were about $1,000 then is all the bookies would take on one bet. you had to take a second bet (at probably lower odds ) if you wanted to put more on. they are SPECIAL KNOWN Punters Brodster. Of course they can get SPECIAL treatment for Biggish bets. Just like Boys get Paid. common sense. Casino's for example have 'High Rollers' that they let on for thousands on some of the games. MUGS like you and the general public only let on at what the usual table limits are . $500 or whatever it is per bet. It's all quite Normal mate. you live under a rock and can't work it out ?? it's not that hard . Special People/clients/pundits always get PREFERENTIAL Treatment . In all walks of life. not just betting. It's pretty normal . Has happened since time again. 👍 -
They allow them on for what they want , no restrictions whatsoever and get gifted thousands of dollars! They are winning on the greyhounds which are not the hardest to win off due to the amounts they are allowed to wager! It is total preferential treatment being given to OTG, we can all see that, whereas others get the opposite treatment! Personally can not see how the CEO of HRNZ has not had this out with the TAB as it js costing harness income?
-
By Nowornever · Posted
That is one of the red flags used by risk management to identify punters at risk to their operation. You might only get away doing it a couple of times before they hit you with the restrict hammer. Cash outs with a decent profit and not letting it ride another one of their red flags. Do it too many times and you are gone burger.
-
-
Topics
-
