Steven

Becks Nairn has been able to establish herself as a reformist voice, however, her credibility falls apart on examination. Her assertions, especially as to Arcano, the grey standardbred, are laced with ex post facto dramatics and lack forensic support. Had Arcano incurred the internal trauma she claims now, euthanasia would have been required at Stable to Stirrup. It wasn’t. She even trained him herself after sale to the new owner but to no avail without her recognising the symptoms that she would later practice as pathology. The horse later performed successfully in Marlborough. His death conditions are vague. What we know is that Nairn might have approved the euthanasia herself- not a trained veterinary body. She then dissected him, capitalised the process and directly profited by his remains. I have demanded time-stamped vet slips, pathology results, and peer review results, three times, publicly. She has produced nothing. Where is the letter of the CEO of Harness Racing? Where is the amended autopsy report? I do not think it comes with blood pathology or certifiable supervision. Rather she makes money behind a paywall, selling butchered narratives to an audience fooled by style over content. She is rhetorically savvy. Her 50,000 followers gave her the assumption of sweeping indictments, outlawing racing, and weaponising her charisma. Yet in the absence of forensic evidence, her platform is a study of how to manipulate the narrative. Whenever confronted by experts, she silences critics by blocking out her platforms and mobilising her followers to suppress critics. I’ve documented this pattern. It is not reform—it is control. Implication is not evidence that I tolerate. I want timestamps, receipts, pathology which is checked by qualified experts, not narrative, not drama, no retroactive assertions. Until she can do so, her accusations stand on air, and her platform is an excellent cautionary library of the sophism of evasion.