curious Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 (edited) Lbs less than topweight Runners total lengths beaten runners*lbs Average lths behind TW avg/lb 0 5839 1152.5 1 966 1270.7 966 1.315 1.315 2 1148 1352.3 2296 1.178 0.589 3 1141 -1006.85 3423 -0.882 -0.294 4 1183 46.7 4732 0.039 0.010 5 1345 345.25 6725 0.257 0.051 6 1348 -184.3 8088 -0.137 -0.023 7 1477 3295.2 10339 2.231 0.319 8 1488 3480.4 11904 2.339 0.292 9 1450 472.2 13050 0.326 0.036 10 1568 1280.9 15680 0.817 0.082 11 1429 2415.6 15719 1.690 0.154 12 1453 2789.75 17436 1.920 0.160 13 1488 2301.8 19344 1.547 0.119 14 1350 4209.7 18900 3.118 0.223 15 1455 3561.05 21825 2.447 0.163 (results for horses with greater weight differences have been left out) To explain what these numbers mean, let’s look at those horses that were carrying 5lbs less than the topweight. There were 1,345 of these horses, giving a total of 6,725lbs (1345*5lbs) difference. These 1,345 horses finished a total of 345.25 lengths behind the topweights, an average of 0.257 lengths per horse, or 0.051 (0.257/5lbs) per pound Edited August 14, 2019 by curious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curious Posted August 14, 2019 Author Share Posted August 14, 2019 And this was for hurdle races and is likely heavily biased to the high side because the lengths beaten include the beaten lengths of runners eased or not persisted with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 Hahaha onya...'Pomgolia Hurdles' where breathing, cadence, length of stride et el IS TOTES DIFFERENT to anything wrt NZ Flat Racing Talk about desperation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.