Wandering Eyes

The Godolphin Holiday Halter Auction, an online sale of halters worn by renowned Darley stallions and some of Godolphin’s star racemares and broodmares (click here to view), will begin Friday, Dec. 14 at 9 a.m. EST, and continue through Monday, Dec. 17. All proceeds will go to the Kentucky Equine Humane Center. The halters, which will include a letter of authenticity, will be shipped for free or can be picked up in person at Jonabell Farm in Lexington, Ky. The auction will be hosted by Starquine.com. View the full article

Observations on the European Racing Scene turns the spotlight on the best European races of the day, highlighting well-pedigreed horses early in their careers, horses of note returning to action and young runners that achieved notable results in the sales ring. Thursday’s Insights features a daughter of MGISW Rags to Riches (A.P. Indy). 5.45 Chelmsford City, Cond, £8,000, 2yo, f, 8f (AWT) Michael Tabor and Derrick Smith’s debutante STRATIFICATION (Australia {GB}), one of three contenders from the John Gosden barns, is a daughter of GI Las Virgenes S., GI Santa Anita Oaks, GI Kentucky Oaks and GI Belmont S. heroine Rags to Riches (A.P. Indy). Her 14 rivals include stablemates Star Catcher (GB) (Sea the Stars {Ire}), who is a hitherto unraced half to GI Canadian International-winning sire Cannock Chase (Lemon Drop Kid) and G2 Prix Eugene Adam victor Pisco Sour (Lemon Drop Kid); and dual runner-up Jadeerah (GB) (Frankel {GB}), who is out of MG1SP G2 Queen Mary S. victress Maqaasid (GB) (Green Desert). View the full article

Equibase Company, in partnership with Keeneland and at the request of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, conducted a test at the Lexington, Ky., track to collect workout data using global positioning satellite (GPS) technology. Equibase currently has GPS systems at Woodbine Racetrack, Golden Gate Fields, Laurel Park, and Pimlico, and is the official timer at those tracks. Equibase’s GPS technology partner, Total Performance Data, is based in the United Kingdom and has more than a dozen tracking systems deployed there. The goal of the six-week test, held September through October 2018, was to identify issues and potential solutions for using GPS technology to track workouts. Results of the study revealed the technology performed well overall and demonstrated the power of being able to track multiple workouts simultaneously. However, further testing is needed with respect to the logistics of using this technology for workouts. “The test revealed that the technology holds great promise to provide race-like accuracy to workout information,” said Jason Wilson, president and chief operating officer for Equibase. View the full article

Last weekend’s Thoroughbred Classic Horse Show drew more than 100 retired racehorses thriving in their second careers at the Los Angeles Equestrian Center in Burbank, Ca. Hosted by CARMA (California Retirement Management Account) as an awareness campaign to promote the adoption of off-track Thoroughbred and foster connections between the racing and equestrian community, the event is the only of its kind on the West Coast. “When we launched this event in 2012, we really wanted to give retired racehorses a welcoming environment to get experience in the show ring,” said Lucinda Mandella, executive director of CARMA. “Seeing horses who have gone through the Placement Program competing in the show brought everything full circle for us.” View the full article

The nominees for the 2019 Godolphin Stud and Stable Staff Awards, sponsored by Godolphin and run by the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) in association with the Racing Post, were announced on Wednesday. A total of 202 nominations, from Flat and National Hunt yards across England, Scotland and Wales, were received. The three finalists in each category will be invited to the Jumeriah Carlton Tower in London on Feb. 18 where the winners will be revealed. “For we judges here comes the best and worst task of the year,” said Brough Scott, who chairs the judging panel. “It’s been bad enough getting each category down to a shortlist of 10 from a total of 202 high quality nominations. Now we have to whittle each group down to just three. All I can promise them is that we will do it with a respect and fairness which matches the admiration and appreciation we have for their efforts every day.” The finalists with their nominator in () are as follows: David Nicholson Newcomer Award–Lee Aziz (Robert Stephens), April Clarke (Jedd O’Keeffe), James Cooke (Overbury Stud), Hannah Crawford (Iain Jardine), Connor Fox (Amy Murphy), Zara Gott (Philip Hobbs), Max McLoughlin (Cheveley Park Stud), Charlie Richards (Andrew Balding), Sophy Scott (Mark Johnston), and Lauren Thomas (Tim Vaughan). Leadership Award–Jessica Bell (Brian Ellison), Catriona Bissett (Nick Alexander), Dan Horsford (Alan King), Steve Howarth (Kevin Ryan), Louise Kennedy (David Lanigan), Leanne Kershaw (Jedd O’Keeffe), Sean Mulcaire (Philip Hobbs), Barry O’Dowd (John Gosden), Ian Russell (David Simcock), and Jarek Stadnik (Richard Fahey). Rider/Groom Award–Ian Clarkson (Micky Hammond), Zoe Fuller (Julia Feilden), Monika Gasparova (Ed Walker), Sean Graham (Philip Hobbs), Stewart Gosnell (Richard Hughes), Javed Iqbal (Tom Dascombe), Darren McAlinden (Nicky Martin), Imran Shahwani (John Gosden), Patrick ‘Paddy’ Trainor (Mark Johnston), and Jessica Wareham (Brian Barr). Stud Staff Award–Noel Challinor (Northmore Stud), Christine Chapman (Theakston Stud), James Frank (Hascombe & Valiant Stud), Sophie Heaps (Highfield Farm), Tom Hughes (Hazelwood Bloodstock), Martin Languillet (Fittocks Stud), Andrew Snell (Cheveley Park Stud), Kevin Tobin (New England Stud), Anna Wesolowska (Witney Stud), and David Woodley (Dullingham Park Stud). Dedication to Racing Award–John Bottomley (Ollie Pears), David Crofts (Marcus Tregoning), John Dixon (Roger Charlton), Jaimie Duff (Lucinda Russell), Helen Halliwell (James Fanshawe), Tracey and Ray Hutt (Highclere Stud), David Macleod (James Ewart), Marjorie Renwick (Harriet Graham), Joline Saunders (Richard Phillips), and Andrew Stringer (John Gosden). Rory MacDonald Community Award–Darren Bird, Amie Canham, Rev. Peter Clark, Lizzie Harris, Deborah Hay, Sarah Montgomery, Andrea O’Keeffe, Shelley Perham, Carly Sage and Amy Starkey View the full article

Keeneland Dec. 12 announced expansions to its 2019 spring meet, which will open April 4, a day earlier than in previous years, and present two new stakes, both $100,000 turf sprints. View the full article

Following the completion of the foal and breeding stock sales in Great Britain and Ireland, there has been much comment about the state of the bloodstock market. While the middle and top end have arguably never been stronger, the bottom end of the market has plummeted to a state not seen since the years following the worldwide financial crisis a decade ago. It is easy to gloss over what has happened at the bottom of the market as being a result of overproduction leading to supply exceeding demand. However, to do so perhaps oversimplifies the situation and also fails to give adequate attention to what a weak bottom of the market means to small breeders that are the foundation on which the entire Thoroughbred industry is built on. Thus, it is worth delving into the figures to illustrate just how bleak the bottom of the foal market is and discuss what has brought it about and what it all means. For this purpose, the sales that have been examined are the foal section of the Flat Foal & Breeding Stock Sale at Tattersalls Ireland, Part 2 of the November Foal Sale at Goffs and the first day of the December Foal Sale at Tattersalls. Those that have read my analysis of bloodstock sales on these pages in the past will know that in an effort to properly contextualise the sale results, a fixed production cost is added to the published stud fee to level the numerical playing field. While each breeder has different circumstances, the figure that has been settled on as an industry average for keep and assorted costs from birth up to a foal sale is 4,000gns. For the Irish sales, this figure has been converted to €4,750 using the average exchange rate from the beginning of 2018 up to the end of November. In total, there were 422 foals offered between the aforementioned sales at Fairyhouse and Goffs of which 240 sold for a clearance rate of 56.4%. Of those just 32 (13.3%) were profitable for the vendors after stud fees and production costs were considered. Of those 32 profitable sales, 18 of them made a profit of less than €5,000 and only 10 made a profit of €10,000 or more. That is the extent of the good news to emerge from the two sales in question. Moving on to the bad news, of the 240 foals that sold, 208 (86.6%) did so at a loss to their breeder. One-hundred-seventy-one of these sold for a loss of €5,000 or more. Seventy-nine sold for a loss of €10,000 or more. Sixteen of them made an eye-watering loss of over €20,000. As bad as that reads, at least those breeders found a buyer for their foals and won’t have to shoulder any more costs. The same cannot be said for the owners of the 182 lots that failed to find a buyer and had to bring their foals home. The figures suggest that this was not a result of vendors putting unrealistic reserves on their horses. Indeed, just seven of those foals had reserves of or were bought back for amounts in excess of their cost. In the vast majority of cases the reserve or figure they were bought back for was substantially lower than their cost. There was simply no one willing to bid enough to meet those conservative reserves. The cumulative stud fees and costs of those 182 unsold lots was €2,272,610, yet none of them could find a buyer. Perhaps most depressingly of all, 59 of those unsold lots either failed to get a single bid or were bought back by their vendors for the minimum bid of €800/€1,000. The cumulative stud fees and production costs of those 59 foals was €690,820. Yet, the market declared that they were all-but worthless on the day of the sale. The situation wasn’t quite as bad at the Tattersalls Foal Sale at Newmarket, but it was still bleak. On the first day of the sale, 254 foals were offered and 154 were sold for a clearance rate of 60.6%. Fifty (32.5%) of those that sold were profitable for their vendors. Eighteen of them scraped a profit of 4,500gns or less and just 22 of them made a profit of 9,000gns or more. On the other side of the coin, 104 (67.5%) of those that were sold made a loss for the vendors. Eighty-three of those sold for a loss of 4,500gns or more, with 43 selling for a loss of 9,000gns or more. Five of them lost 18,000gns or more. However, while the results for those that sold were less bleak than at Goffs, the details of the 100 foals that didn’t sell make for equally depressing reading. Again, this wasn’t a case of vendors putting obviously excessive reserves on their foals, with only 11 of the 100 unsold foals having reserves that were higher than their production costs. The cumulative costs of those 100 foals was 1,288,196gns. Twenty-four of those 100 unsold lots failed to attract a single bid or were bought back for the minimum bid of 800gns. The cumulative costs of those foals was 306,950gns. Despite the huge investment made in them, not one of them attracted a single bid. So, what can be taken from all of this? When confronted with results such as the above, many observers are likely to point the finger at two factors: stallion fees being too high and breeders producing too many low-quality horses. To address the stallion fee theory, I ran all the above numbers again with every stallion fee hypothetically reduced by 20%. This change only resulted in nine of the 208 unprofitable foals sold at the aforementioned sales at Goffs and Fairyhouse becoming profitable for their vendors. On day one of the Tattersalls Foal Sale, the same 20% reduction in stallion fees would only have brought seven of the 104 unprofitable foals into profitability. In a nutshell, while lower stallion fees will reduce the losses of breeders, they are not to blame for the depressing state of the bottom of the foal market. If it isn’t stallion fees that are blamed for these poor figures, most are likely to point the finger of blame at the breeders for what is widely considered to be overproduction of foals from below-standard mares and stallions. The general comment one tends to hear on this subject is that breeders need to up their standards, reduce mare numbers and try to use better stallions. There is undoubtedly some wisdom in this line of thinking, but I am not so sure the full emphasis should be on this line of reaction. The importance of the role played by smaller breeders in the industry, over 90% of whom in Great Britain and Ireland have four or fewer mares, should not be underestimated. They essentially act as the gold panners of the bloodstock world, sifting through the lesser mares and stallions in search of unlikely gems. History is littered with examples of broodmares with questionable credentials proving to be excellent producers after being given a chance at stud by smaller breeders. Likewise, it shouldn’t be forgotten that the likes of Kodiac, Dark Angel, Invincible Spirit and Exceed And Excel started off their stallion careers standing for fees of €10,000 or less and in the main it was the support of smaller breeders that gave them the opportunity to show their worth. While there is no question that breeders can help themselves by being more ruthless in calling it a day with mares that have been given their chance and not come up to the required mark, they should not be demonised for performing what is a very important function in the industry at the bottom end of the market. As well as that, when one takes a step back and looks at the British and Irish racing industries, one can readily question whether overproduction of foals is the actual problem at all given there is more than enough need for the amount of horses currently being bred in Britain and Ireland. The fixture list is crying out for more runners to fill it and there are very few trainers that don’t want more horses to train. Rather than overproduction, the real issue is a lack of people willing to put horses into training to race, particularly at the lower end of the scale. This leads to a weak bottom end of the yearling market which has resulted in pinhookers being reluctant to take chances on cheaper foals at the foal sales. Thus, rather than focusing entirely on the breeders, perhaps we as an industry should be coming up with ways that make the bottom end of the market more attractive to both pinhookers and end users in an effort to grow the market from the bottom up. Auction races hold the most appeal as a means to do this. Auction maidens have increased in popularity in Ireland in recent seasons courtesy of the excellent Foran Equine Irish EBF Auction Series and an increase in the number of such races would be welcomed. Specifically, more auction maidens confined to horses purchased for €30,000 or less would serve to offer more incentive for owners to get involved at that level of the yearling market. As well as that, the introduction of a series of auction nurseries for horses bought for €30,000 or less would also be a welcome addition for those not good enough to win a maiden. Similarly, perhaps, there could be scope to link a series of such lower value auction maidens and nurseries to a bonus scheme that specifically caters to this end of the market. Many of the existing bonus schemes regularly reward those that don’t especially need rewarding and a scheme that zones in on stimulating increased business at the bottom end of the market can only be a positive. With the popularity of ownership syndicates and racing clubs on the rise, we as an industry should be doing all we can to make ownership as attractive as possible. With the bottom end of the market being the most accessible to newcomers to ownership, anything that makes owning racehorses bought at that level more attractive should be encouraged. A strengthening in the bottom of the yearling market will lead to a strengthening of the bottom of the foal market which will keep smaller breeders in the game. All growth starts from the ground, but it requires nourishment and attention from above to stimulate it. Right now, the bottom of the foal market is in bad need of attention. If you’re interested in providing feedback contact Kevin Blake on Twitter @kevinblake2011. Or send your opinion to Gary King garyking@thetdn.com. View the full article

13.15 Newcastle Highland Hunter lived up to the hype and confirmed his early promise following point to point and bumper successes when romping home at Ayr last time out on hurdling debut. Lucinda Russell’s latest recruit was so impressive that day with the manner of the win and the astute Scottish trainer has found him […] The post Picks From The Paddock Best Bet – Thursday 13th December appeared first on RaceBets Blog EN. View the full article

“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.” The axiom is routinely attributed to Warren Buffett, though credited by him to Ben Graham. But there is nothing like the bloodstock market to remind us that value is subjective–making the setting of a stallion’s fee, the annual exercise that has occupied some of the most experienced minds in the business over recent weeks, an extremely delicate balancing act. A mare owner’s sense of value, after all, may itself be determined precisely by the ambitions implied in a fee. In a world where so many purchases will be recycled, and generally sooner rather than later, a stallion’s brand needs to be protected. Present a sire to market as a bargain, and you have to hope that he is welcomed as “commercial” rather than dismissed as “cheap”. On the other hand, you can’t price him beyond that point where the customer thinks him fair value. As with all markets, then, it’s a two-way street. Both sides need to be able to make sense of the deal. Within any major farm, indeed, there will be people pulling in different directions. The marketing guys want the fee to be as attractive as possible; the accountants want it to be as high as it can be, without eroding book size. “Setting a fee is an art, not a science,” reflects Dan Pride, chief operating officer of Darley America at Jonabell Farm–where they have an interesting annual ritual that not only gives their whole team a say, but allows those who make the ultimate decision to take a pulse, both informed and interested, beyond their own hopes and fears. “Everyone who’s responsible for selling seasons or marketing stallions has to sit around a table with a piece of paper and independently write down each stallion’s name and what they think his fee should be,” Pride explains. “Then we go back and forth debating before making a recommendation. We do try to make it a communal effort, so that people have a chance internally to voice an opinion.” Obviously the critical fee, for any stallion, tends to be the one at which he starts. In many cases, he will never again command one so high, just because it is statistically inevitable that most sires will not make the grade. But some farms are at particular pains to avoid having to take evasive action during the notoriously difficult third and fourth seasons, when breeders tend to reserve judgement on first yearlings, and then first runners. “It’s a fine line,” says Bernie Sams, seasons and bloodstock manager at Claiborne Farm. “But obviously if you get it wrong, and have to drop one, it’s not good. If you’re going to be wrong, you’re better off being wrong low–and then be able to pick and choose through the mares. If you get it wrong high, and have to drop, then people run scared. “The first couple of years probably we’re going to be on the lower side of where some other places may be. But then if we’re able to maintain for the third and fourth years, it evens out when you don’t have to change the fees. That is key to us. The guy who paid $25,000 the first two years doesn’t have very good taste in his mouth if you’ve meanwhile dropped to $15,000. And won’t be as quick to come back.” One good example of thinking that way was Dialed In (Mineshaft) at Darby Dan. “He could easily have started higher than $7,500,” says Robert Hammond, the farm’s vice-chairman. “But you try to start them off at a price that gives people a chance to make their profit and to have a good experience. There are some farms you see that pitch their new sires as high as possible–but that does potentially expose their clients to a bad experience.” Sure enough, after his first runners walked the walk, Dialed In’s fee was doubled and he has since advanced to $25,000. Darby Dan, of course, is also one of many farms nowadays to offer a variety of incentive schemes to patrons. And sometimes programs of this kind make the formal stud fee relatively academic, little more than a market peg. “We have tried to create a synergistic relationship with our breeders,” explains Elliott Walden, president and CEO of WinStar, who reckons the farm has given away $3 million in stallion rewards over the past three years. “We’ve done that to incentivize breeders who had success with our stallions, to reward them for a job well done–and to get them continuing to breed at WinStar. It has been huge for the little breeder. We have clients who have been able to upgrade their whole program: instead of breeding to $10,000 horses, they are now breeding to $50,000 horses. And you never know where that takes someone, down the road.” The one solecism that absolutely must be avoided, according to Sams, is to repent of an ambitious fee once it has been set. “You do that, you’re in trouble,” he says. “You start a horse too high, and nobody goes to him, and you have to drop the fee within a month or two? Then you’re behind the eight-ball from the very beginning. Then you have to go out and start hustling people, and that’s the last thing you want to do.” That is consistent with a preference for trying to err on the side of generosity. Needless to say, however, once a young stallion’s stock has proceeded through market reception to racetrack performance, then every farm has to sit down and take a fresh look at the road he appears to be traveling. “Essentially when they retire you’ve got three variables: pedigree, race record and conformation,” says Pride. “And you’re trying to look at the relative value of those three variables, compared to what you’re going to compete against–both on your own roster, and in the general market where you’re standing the horse. But once you have runners of racing age, and that fourth element of performance, you’re still looking at where each horse slots in relation to its competition. You always try to have a feel for what we call the right side of price. “It’s a subjective mindset, but you try to make sure that if people are interested in your stallion, the price is really the last thing they consider instead of the first. That they go through the other aspects of the horse, and how he fits the mare, and then hope the price lines up with that.” And it’s a moving target. As Pride remarks, you’re having a discussion in November about the value of matings that won’t begin until February. Between setting fees and the end of the covering season, there are many big races that can affect a stallion’s profile, for richer, for poorer. That is especially true of a young stallion with one or two early flag-bearers coming through. The overall temper of the market can change prejudices, too. Walden notes that breeders took sanctuary in proven sires after the recession in 2008, but that the bull run since has prompted a return to “home-run” speculation in new sires. Then there are the ups and downs in the fortunes of a particular stallion. Off the record, the director of one major farm cited an example of an elite sire who had hit a flat spot in his career. For where he found himself now, his fee should strictly have been halved. But the fear was that an associated air of panic would have the reverse of the desired effect, so he was given a conservative trim and is now treading water. At Claiborne, however, they had the courage to take exactly that drastic action with Blame (Arch)–slashing his fee for last season from $25,000 to $12,500. Given that he had just sired a Classic winner in Europe, it was not as though he was wholly lacking momentum. Sure enough, those who were tempted by the new fee (taking his book up to 112 from 48) were delighted to see him enjoy a stellar campaign this year, earning elevation past his old fee to $30,000. “They always have dips,” says Sams. “You take War Front. He went 12.5, 12.5, 10, and probably we did deals the third year and didn’t bring a lot of mares. With Blame, last year was at struggle at 25. So at the end of the year we cut him in half, and it worked. And then they started running. So it worked both ways. And now I’ve a long list of people want to breed to the horse at 30 next year. But saying that, if you went to 40, would you have the same ability to pick and choose through mares?” War Front has earned his stripes all the way to $250,000, and it was a similar story with Tapit at Gainesway: clipped to $12,500 from an opening $15,000 by the time his stock ventured into public and began moving himself to the stratosphere. At WinStar, equally, Walden can point to Distorted Humor, now in the evening of his career but at one point able to multiply his second-year fee of $10,000 by a factor of 30. “All these horses were just given an opportunity,” Walden says. “They weren’t given a silver spoon in their mouth. They earned it. So, you’ve got to price them where they get an opportunity. You have to adjust sometimes. You just have to pay attention to your market and adapt, depending upon supply and demand. That’s really the driver, like anything else in this country. Because if stallions don’t get opportunities, they can’t prove themselves. That’s the bottom line. “So typically, when you sit down and evaluate where a horse is in his career, you have to think in terms of a partnership with your breeders. Because if you try to look at it singularly, just for the stallion owner or the shareholder, then you’re going to leave your breeders behind. “There has to be a balance. There’s a tremendous life cycle to this business. If one entity tries to get too far out, it doesn’t work. The worst thing that can happen is for Grade I winners to become too cheap to buy, from a stallion perspective. Racehorse owners need to be compensated for their stallion prospects. It all kind of works in unison. You have to marry the breeders’ needs, and their ability to make a profit, and your own need to make a profit. So you try to set the fee right down the middle.” In the end, that comes down to instinct. If your client’s view of value is subjective, then it’s a case of making a call based on experience. Farms know how their clients think. And everyone knows how stallions can fail, with the world at their feet; or equally rise to stardom from nowhere. “Walker [Hancock] and Seth [Hancock] and I will talk about it over a period of time but really you’ve got a pretty good idea where you want to be,” says Sams with a shrug. “It’s not brain surgery. Really it’s not.” View the full article

Caspar Fownes’ Smart Baby continued his excellent form, ringing up a third straight win, while his jockey Zac Purton racked up a hat-trick of his own as everyone fought through a Longines Hong Kong International Races hangover at Happy Valley on Wednesday night. After celebrating a local sweep at Sha Tin on Sunday, the biggest day of the season, it was hard for anyone to get really excited about your standard midweek fare, but Purton, fresh off two Group One wins, continued his excellent... View the full article

Hall of Fame trainer Steve Asmussen brings strength in numbers into the $400,000 Remington Springboard Mile Stakes, boasting five entrants in the 11-horse field for the one-mile test on Dec. 16. View the full article

A race for juveniles that had attracted horses like Will Take Charge and Caleb's Posse in recent years, the Springboard Mile at Remington Park gained even more status when it was added to the Road to the Kentucky Derby series. View the full article

15:20 Hexham A very competitive handicap hurdle awaits us in the last race at Hexham this afternoon where a case could easily be made for any of the ten-strong field. Course and distance winners Beyondtemptation and bottom weight Towerburn both have credible chances based on their form at this venue. The ever consistent Sheriff Garrett […] The post Picks From The Paddock Best Bet – Wednesday 12th December appeared first on RaceBets Blog EN. View the full article

Freedman back on top as he claims Singapore title View the full article

A $2,000 fine slapped on Javier Castellano was upheld by top regulators at the state Gaming Commission for a bumping incident during an August race at Saratoga Race Course won by the Hall of Fame jockey. View the full article

After no significant move forward on a $25 million plan to renovate the grandstand and install historical racing machines, Turfway Park on unveiled a less daring plan Dec. 11 that would aim to have 350 machines up and running by June. View the full article

As New York regulators move to add new government oversight of backstretch housing at three New York Racing Association racetracks, NYRA officials Dec. 11 promoted the corporation's housing improvement efforts as a nation-leading model. View the full article

Two-time Eclipse Award-winning broadcaster Tom Hammond and the late Eclipse Award-winning cinematographer Joe Burnham have been selected to the National Museum of Racing's Joe Hirsch Media Roll of Honor. View the full article

The Las Vegas and casino gambling staple roulette will take on a new form beginning with Santa Anita’s Winter Meet opening day Wednesday, Dec. 26, as Horse Racing Roulette will debut as a win-only wager available in all opening day races which have fields of six or more horses. The game, which will have the identical 15.43% takeout as regular win wagers at Santa Anita, will work by having horses designated into one of three groups, Red, Black or Green and payoffs will be made according to the “color” of the winner and standard parimutuel calculations. In most cases, the morning-line favorite will be part of the Red Group, while the Green Group will be comprised mainly of longshots. The three groups, in most cases, will not have an equal number of horses. For the full list of rules, click here. View the full article

Golden Gate Fields concluded its 2018 fall meet Dec. 9 with a 19% year-to-year gain in all sources pari-mutuel handle over the course of 30 racing days. Increases in out of state wagering and off-track betting helped contribute to a total fall meet handle of $99.7 million, well above the $83.6 million wagered in 2017. “We had another great meet,” said Golden Gate Fields Vice President and General Manager David Duggan. “We, first and foremost, greatly appreciate the support of our loyal fans and horseplayers. Additionally, the horsemen have been working tirelessly as have our front-side staff. At the end of the day, it takes a great team to make a successful racing product and we have a great team here. We have improved our product in many ways this year and we look forward to continued progress in 2019.” Jonathon Wong was the leading trainer for the third meet in a row with 28 wins. Hall of Famer Jerry Hollendorfer finished second in the trainer standings with 15 wins. William “Billy” Antongeorgi III topped the jockey standings with 36 victories, one more than Abel Cedillo. With the its upcoming winter/spring meet scheduled to run from Dec. 26 through June 9, Golden Gate Fields has announced an increase in maiden special weight and allowance race purses, while also bumping up bottom level claiming and maiden claiming purses to a minimum of $10,000. View the full article

Stronach homebred Something Awesome (Awesome Again) is under consideration for Gulfstream’s GI Pegasus World Cup Jan. 26. The 7-year-old gelding won this year’s GIII General George S. and GII Charles Town Classic. “Something Awesome is training really well. I’ve got him back the way I expected him to come back. He’s gone through a lot of things, but he’s ready,” trainer Jose Corrales said. “I don’t call those shots, but I’d love to run him in the Pegasus and I think he’s ready for that competition.” Finishing last as the favorite after bleeding in the GIII Pimlico Special S. May 18, he was subsequently shelved and in a Laurel allowance Nov. 16, where he finished second. “I think he doesn’t really need another race before [the Pegasus],” Corrales said. “If there’s a race that comes up somewhere we can go for it, if there’s an allowance or a little stake around, but I don’t plan to travel too far with him before that.” The conditioner continued, “It’s something that everybody wishes for. If there’s any race you want to be in, this is it. Especially coming from Maryland, like he did to win the [Charles Town] Classic, because all the horses from everywhere come in for a race like that. If he can get a chance to run in a race like the Pegasus I think it would be something special.” Stablemate and fellow Stronach homebred Unbridled Juan (Unbridled’s Song) is also under consideration for the Pegasus. The MGSP gray captured the Oct. 17 Grover Buddy Delp Memorial S. at Delaware and the Richard W. Smalls S. at Laurel Nov. 10. He is being pointed for the nine-panel Queens County S. at Aqueduct Dec. 22. “I think Unbridled Juan will be a tough horse in the [Pegasus]. I’m thinking about it. I think that horse, the more distance he gets the better he is,” Corrales said. “He’s doing really good. We’re going to run him in the race on the 22nd in New York and see what happens after that.” View the full article

The Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation (TRF) has secured a $50,000 matching gift from the Geoffrey C. Hughes Foundation (GHF) for its 2018 Hay Drive. The GHF will match every gift received by the TRF up to $50,000 for its Hay Drive campaign through the end of 2018. The TRF’s goal for the 2018 Hay Drive is $250,000 to cover the cost of hay for the 700 horses in their care throughout the winter of 2018-2019. “We are grateful to the Geoffrey C. Hughes Foundation for this generous gift and the leadership it represents,” said Kim Weir, Director of Major Gifts and Planned Giving for the TRF. “By doubling the impact each dollar given up to $50,000, we are hopeful that many new donors will be inspired to contribute to this critically important element of the TRF annual operations. The TRF Hay Drive is one of the most important campaigns for the organization providing rescue, sanctuary retraining and retirement for Thoroughbreds no longer able to compete at the racetrack.” The campaign will be conducted by direct mail, email and social media as well as one-on-one donation requests. To contribute, you may give online here. For more information, contact Kim Weir at 518-226-0028 x105 or kim@thoroughbredretirement.org or Jennifer Stevens at 518-226-0028 x106 or jennifer@thoroughbredretirement.org. View the full article

Two-time Eclipse Award-winning broadcaster Tom Hammond and the late Eclipse Award-winning cinematographer Joe Burnham have been selected to the National Museum of Racing’s Joe Hirsch Media Roll of Honor, the museum announced Tuesday. Hammond, one of television’s most respected and versatile talents, began his racing coverage with NBC Sports in 1984 and was the network’s main racing host until 2017. Hammond’s horse racing coverage has included the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Belmont Stakes, as well as Summer at Saratoga and the Breeders’ Cup. He has also called figure skating, college basketball, Notre Dame football and NFL games for the network. Burnham (1923-1994), a native of Norfolk, Va., was one of the most esteemed cinematographers and television producers in Thoroughbred racing history, winning an Eclipse Award in 1972 for film achievement and being recognized by the National Turf Writers Association with the Joe Palmer Award in 1991. Burnham filmed the sport of Thoroughbred racing in person through five decades and was instrumental in organizing and archiving decades of historical racing footage. He served as the producer for the Eclipse Awards for 17 years and director for the Thoroughbred Racing Associations Champions Film from 1960 through 1966. The Joe Hirsch Media Roll of Honor Committee is comprised of Edward L. Bowen (chairman), president of the Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation; retired Jockey Club vice president of corporate communications Bob Curran; National Museum of Racing trustee Ken Grayson; retired turf publicist Jane Goldstein; and Dan Smith, senior media coordinator of the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club. View the full article

David Cohen–who is enjoying a banner season after resuming his promising riding career following an injury-induced hiatus spanning almost four years–is the recipient of JockeyTalk360.com’s Comeback Jockey of the Year Award, presented by Red Brand Fence. Cohen will receive the award during the Jockeys’ Guild Assembly luncheon Tuesday at Top Golf located adjacent to the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Irad Ortiz will be honored as JockeyTalk360 Turf Jockey of the Year and Drayden Van Dyke will be recognized as JockeyTalk360 Breakthrough Jockey of the Year. The JockeyTalk360 awards are in addition to the honors handed out at the luncheon by the Jockeys’ Guild at their annual assembly. The 34-year-old Cohen has won 109 races and almost $6.5 million in 2018 purse earnings through Friday, according to Equibase statistics, including taking the GII Hill Prince on Have At It (Kitten’s Joy) and the GIII Matron on Lonely Road (Quality Road). Cohen was among the sport’s rising stars when he was kicked in his lower right leg by his mount in the paddock at Aqueduct Feb. 1, 2014. His badly fractured fibula and tibia required surgery involving a plate and six screws to repair. “It was never a matter of ‘if’ but a matter of ‘when’ I was going to return,” Cohen said. “If you’re not right mentally, it’s going to show. I wouldn’t do that to people trusting me with the horses and giving me an opportunity if I wasn’t 100% ready, not just physically but the mental state as well. It was just wanting to do it the right way.” View the full article

If you want to put a gun to my head, I think I am going to vote for Justify, but with reservations. There is the brevity of his career, two of the tracks that he won over were a little gimmicky and the class of the horse he beat wasn’t much. I’m not one of those people who always knock the 3-year-old crop, but you couldn’t help but notice how little this group, outside of Justify, accomplished. It turns out that there was no depth in the Triple Crown races. I guess that 1882 and an undefeated Triple Crown winner has to trump a horse who had a very good list of accomplishments over a greater period of time. You had to beat this out of me because I’ve really been unsure. You look at a body of work and Accelerate really did put together a good body of work. He came East and he finally got the trainer off the duck in the Breeders’ Cup. He’ll be champion older dirt horse, but it really is a shame that it looks like he’s not going to be Horse of the Year. John Pricci is an Eclipse Award voter View the full article