How can NZTR charge a person on a serious racing...

[NZRacing]

offence when they don't publish exactly who the Authorised wagering operators and bookmakers are.  As a Governing body your not doing due dilegence to those involved in your Industry when not publishing the companys that are registered. If you want to regulate the market by setting guidelines surely it's up that organisation to stipulate the aproved suppliers to do business with. Thats how normal business's would operate.

And exactly who does a person relate to? It should say any person 'registered by NZTR'.  

Quote

may publish a list from time to time.   You want to have a rule which if not adherd to will constitue as a serious racing offence yet you have a wimisical ruling like that.

A court wouldn't let someone be charged if the  organisation that they paid  regulating fees to didn't supply them with the relevant information in order to abide by a ruling.

But the main reason you would provide the info and update is so that registered people are made fully aware of the authorised companies which by joining rather than ones that are not will return more revenue to the NZ Racing Idustry to benefit all. 

May from time to time - #$^k me. NZTR obviously have money to burn as they dont try to increase outside revenue. The days of sitting back and clipping the ticket are gone you have to work and use your head to get results.

 

Edited October 30, 2023 by NZRacing

[Reefton]

Have NZTR charged someone?

Can NZTR charge someone themselves or is that(the charging) the domain of the RIB?

Because if NZTR are able to lay charges I want them to charge Oatham and Clement under rule 801(1) for lying to a Steward or Official of a Racing Club.  They did it and did not(and could not) deny it but because they are the cops in this scenario they just gave us the one fingered salute