mardigras Posted January 23, 2019 Share Posted January 23, 2019 I think you'll find that the mitigating factors are subjective. Therefore her statement might be factual. And it might not. It's an opinion. Your last sentence is also not a fact. Who knew? Clearly not you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandpiper Posted January 23, 2019 Share Posted January 23, 2019 As a LORD of KNOWLEDGENESS on antipodean social media related to persons of EQUINISM I can categorically state that the troublesome tweeter was not even guilty under Aussie rules let alone NZ. The only unfortunate thing was she hit delete on her one tweet instead of the whole twitterland. Now Im off to stick my fingers in my ears and point my nose upwind and that is a FACT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted January 23, 2019 Author Share Posted January 23, 2019 Wow, even though she's questioned the Feds judgement, calling them inconsistent? When she got the facts wrong...both got the required month... I think you'll find Australia's Feds would have at least given her a stern warning to get her FACTS right at the very least.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.