Southland,Race riding

[Chief Stipe]

1 hour ago, Special Agent said:

And, even though the whipping thread has been sealed, we really are a part of a two faced industry, and it's definitely been mentioned multiple times.  We have rules about what you can and can't do with the Persuader and some are appalled with the policing of the rules here yet, it's absolutely fine to sell, watch and bet on horses in a jurisdiction where use of the whip seems to be at the jockeys' discretion with an "anything goes" attitude.

In my opinion and experience supports that opinion the industry participants at all levels focus on the wrong things.  For example isn't it more important to focus on the safety and consistency of tracks first rather than issues that are further down the line like counting whip strikes?  

When working in IT I used a process I learnt through an academic course that worked well.  That process in brief was to identify the constraints (bottlenecks) in a system and elevate that constraint to the number one focus.  The first step was to measure that part of the process accurately especially the variance from the mean - then assign all change resources to that constraint.  The first step in the change proces was to remove the variance (make the process outputs consistent) and once that was done raise the mean.  THEN only then once that constraint was eliminated focus on the elevate the next constraint.

As you know for a very long time I've been advocating the focus of all the industry resources on fixing the tracks - making them more consistent, safer and fairer.  If we did that you'd see an improvement in lots of other areas e.g. race riding tactics.  You'd also see an improvement in revenue and a rise in the optimism of owners and trainers.

The same should apply to rule enforcement.  Focus on those rules that affect horse and Jockey safety.  Whip strike counting and placement is a distraction that as you point out some major jurisdictions have less emphasis on.  

[curious]

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

 As you know for a very long time I've been advocating the focus of all the industry resources on fixing the tracks - making them more consistent, safer and fairer.  If we did that you'd see an improvement in lots of other areas e.g. race riding tactics.  You'd also see an improvement in revenue and a rise in the optimism of owners and trainers.

Don't think many would disagree with that but it's one thing recognising it as a bottle neck and another, NZTR doing anything about it. Messara clearly saw it as a problem in 2018 and recommended that over 6 years, through the 25/26 season, we rationalise to 28 tracks and spend $190m upgrading infrastructure at those remaining 28. As far as I can see all that has happened 6 years later is they have hired a consulting group to come up with yet another venue plan.

[Chief Stipe]

2 minutes ago, curious said:

Don't think many would disagree with that but it's one thing recognising it as a bottle neck and another, NZTR doing anything about it. Messara clearly saw it as a problem in 2018 and recommended that over 6 years, through the 25/26 season, we rationalise to 28 tracks and spend $190m upgrading infrastructure at those remaining 28. As far as I can see all that has happened 6 years later is they have hired a consulting group to come up with yet another venue plan.

The plan was derailed by self-interested Clubs aided and abetted by a few loud mouth stirrers.   Coupled with that and a lack of strong charismatic leadership it all turned to shyte.  Now everyone is entrenched and the problems are not fixed and if anything are getting worse.  Reinforcing that are half arsed renovations constrained by a lack of capital and expertise.  Even those that had the capital didn't get it right and are now believing their own propaganda e.g. Ellerslie.  The "iconic shape" justification is hilarious!  

[Special Agent]

2 hours ago, curious said:

rationalise to 28 tracks and spend $190m upgrading infrastructure at those remaining 28. 

That's not even $7million per track.  That might have been a lot of money once but, I don't believe it's a large amount to upgrade much in 2026.

Where does the money come from to maintain the venues going forward?  Assets can only be sold once.

I think it's short sighted.

[Special Agent]

2 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

The plan was derailed by self-interested Clubs aided and abetted by a few loud mouth stirrers.   Coupled with that and a lack of strong charismatic leadership it all turned to shyte.  Now everyone is entrenched and the problems are not fixed and if anything are getting worse.  Reinforcing that are half arsed renovations constrained by a lack of capital and expertise.  Even those that had the capital didn't get it right and are now believing their own propaganda e.g. Ellerslie.  The "iconic shape" justification is hilarious!  

Lack of strong charismatic leadership ...  you got that right!  Have you noticed how the most useless people at anything have such tickets on themselves?  The best people seem to be the ones whom no one even realises the great work they do.

Lack of capital and expertise  ...  one is not much chop without the other.

[Chief Stipe]

1 minute ago, Special Agent said:

Where does the money come from to maintain the venues going forward?  Assets can only be sold once.

There's the conundrum.  The assets aren't earning enough to maintain themselves now.  We are rapidly heading towards a scenario of "do you want 25 racecourses or none"?

All well and good sounding altruristic saying that "the assets should go to the community that built them" but that isn't the case.  They are racing assets.

[Special Agent]

1 minute ago, Chief Stipe said:

All well and good sounding altruristic saying that "the assets should go to the community that built them" but that isn't the case.  They are racing assets.

I think we are looking at different situations across the country e.g. Avondale vs Levin.  First there is the actual (not projected) value.  Then look at where they are situated.  Finally look at the value of each to the industry.  Someone said earlier about comparing apples with apples, case in point.

[Thomass]

4 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

In my opinion and experience supports that opinion the industry participants at all levels focus on the wrong things.  For example isn't it more important to focus on the safety and consistency of tracks first rather than issues that are further down the line like counting whip strikes?  

When working in IT I used a process I learnt through an academic course that worked well.  That process in brief was to identify the constraints (bottlenecks) in a system and elevate that constraint to the number one focus.  The first step was to measure that part of the process accurately especially the variance from the mean - then assign all change resources to that constraint.  The first step in the change proces was to remove the variance (make the process outputs consistent) and once that was done raise the mean.  THEN only then once that constraint was eliminated focus on the elevate the next constraint.

As you know for a very long time I've been advocating the focus of all the industry resources on fixing the tracks - making them more consistent, safer and fairer.  If we did that you'd see an improvement in lots of other areas e.g. race riding tactics.  You'd also see an improvement in revenue and a rise in the optimism of owners and trainers.

The same should apply to rule enforcement.  Focus on those rules that affect horse and Jockey safety.  Whip strike counting and placement is a distraction that as you point out some major jurisdictions have less emphasis on.  

Ridiculous.... building safe tracks are the remit of NZTR and whip abuse is the remit of RIB 

RIB cant even see or count....Magoo does dyscalculia