Journalists Wandering Eyes Posted September 10, 2019 Journalists Share Posted September 10, 2019 Editor’s Note: The Jockey Club has asked for public comment on their proposal to cap at 140 the number of mares a stallion can breed annually. In this ongoing series, we will publish the perspectives of breeders, stallion farms and others on the proposal. Tanya Gunther, Glennwood Farm I think we have bigger problems to worry about than capping mares to a stallion. I think our current PR issues, the public perception of horse racing and the survival of horse racing as an industry is more important. I’d like the industry to be focusing on that and trying to solve these issues rather than shifting focus to something secondary such as capping the number of mares in a stallion’s book. In terms of capping the number of mares, I’d rather that supply and demand determine stud fees and number of mares in a book rather than us instituting an artificial ceiling. I believe the value of a colt as a stallion prospect will be negatively impacted by a ceiling. It’s important to the market for that potential value to be there and the number of mares to a stallion is part of that value calculation. I think each stallion farm can decide to cap the number of mares to a stallion if they wish to do so (and it does happen at some stallion farms) and that the number of mares in a book should be at the stallion owner’s discretion as he/she tries to formulate the best plan to help the stallion make it as a sire. We sometimes breed to popular stallions and would like the freedom to breed to the stallions that we want in order to pursue our mating plans rather than potentially be shut out. We try to focus on breeding the best racehorse that we can and if we can’t get a mare into a stallion because of a cap, that would detract from what we are trying to achieve. We occasionally reach upward for a young mare that we have a lot of faith in (i.e. breed to a higher priced stallion than what the pedigree or race record may be perceived as justified), and a cap could negatively impact our ability to do that. As breeders, we know that a popular stallion at certain stud farms might get 200 mares, so we can decide to breed elsewhere if we are concerned about the commercial aspect. But, equally, if we want to breed to that stallion because we think it’s a good mating, we would like to be able to do that. I really think it all comes down to supply and demand, and that market forces should be allowed to work. Have an opinion you’d like to share? Email suefinley@thetdn.com The post Opinions on the Cap: Tanya Gunther appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions. View the full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.