Uh? Who stated online that the horse in question had a hoof crack so bad that it was a horse welfare issue based on a photo? Who didn't contact the vendor or the agency BEFORE making the comment online on supposedly "NZ's largest anti-racing forum"? Who when evidence was posted to the contrary on the sale site and on BOAY state that the photo "didn't look right" and "the time stamp could have been altered"? Neigh! Not I! Wasn't it the @Comic Dog ?
BTW why did you bid for the horse?
May I suggest very politely that you have no idea what the word "malcontent" means.
The definition of malcontent is:
A person who is chronically dissatisfied, often complaining about existing conditions, authority, or the status quo.
Now @nomates in the last month alone you have complained or expressed dissatisfaction about your horse trainer, NZTR, the RIB and much more. All I have done is post the facts and disagreed with your general dissatisfaction.
Your mate @Comic Dog is not much better.
Exactly. That there is a conspiracy is your theory, as is who is running it if there is one.
And I'm bloody sure you did start this thread promoting the idea that there was a conspiracy.
OK you really are working hard to stay within the Three Stooges Cult. Did I start the Topic about the BA hooves? NO. Did I suggest that subsequent photos were fake? NO. So who is running a conspiracy here?