Federal Appeals Court Affirms Dismissal of Wests’ Derby Lawsuit

[Wandering Eyes]

A three-judge panel on a federal appeals court Friday upheld a district court’s decision from last November to dismiss a lawsuit by the owners of Maximum Security (New Year’s Day) that sought to overturn the colt’s controversial disqualification from first place in the 2019 GI Kentucky Derby.

“What should have been the fastest two minutes in sports turned into over a year of litigation,” wrote Judge John K. Bush in the opinion accompanying the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. “Neither Kentucky law nor the Fourteenth Amendment allows for judicial second-guessing of the stewards’ call.

“The district court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim,” the opinion stated. “It determined that the stewards’ decision was not reviewable under Kentucky law, that the Wests had no property interest in the prize winnings, and that the challenged regulation is not unconstitutionally vague…. We agree and affirm the judgment of the district court.”

In the 2019 Derby, Maximum Security led almost every step and crossed the wire first. But there was bumping and shifting in close quarters as he led the pack off the final turn. Two jockeys filed post-race objections, but there was no posted stewards’ inquiry.

The three stewards who officiated the Derby–chief state steward Barbara Borden, state steward Brooks “Butch” Becraft, and Churchill Downs steward Tyler Picklesimer–launched a post-Derby adjudication process that played out on national TV.

After 22 agonizing minutes, Maximum Security was judged to have fouled Long Range Toddy (Take Charge Indy), and thus placed behind that rival in 17th place. Country House (Lookin At Lucky), who crossed the wire second, was elevated to first place via the DQ process.

Ten days later, Gary and Mary West, who own Maximum Security, sued the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission and the Churchill Downs stewards based on allegations that “the final [revised Derby] order is not supported by substantial evidence on the whole record” and that the disqualification violated the plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment rights.

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the suit was granted by a U.S. District Court judge Nov. 15. The Wests appealed, and the case was argued June 16.

This story will be updated.

The post Federal Appeals Court Affirms Dismissal of Wests’ Derby Lawsuit appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

View the full article