Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought the JCA were totally independent of the governing bodies and the penalty levels were what that the JCA felt appropriate.

I learn something everyday but have to question whether this should be the correct way to go - a trainer dopes a horse with xyz and if all things equal surely the penalty should be the same whether a trotter or a galloper ,

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, LongOwner said:

I thought the JCA were totally independent of the governing bodies and the penalty levels were what that the JCA felt appropriate.

I also thought the RIU was completely independent of New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing (NZTR), Harness Racing NZ (HRNZ) and the Greyhound Racing New Zealand (GRNZ) but it is not. It has a four member board with one representative from NZTR, HRNZ, GRNZ and one representative from the New Zealand Racing Board (NZRB).

Edited by Delta Bro
  • Champ Post 1
Posted (edited)

Each code entirely separately makes its own rules including penalties in accord with the Racing Act. The RIU and JCA are then responsible for enforcing those.

29 Racing rules

(1) Every racing code must make, and maintain in force, rules regulating the conduct of racing by that code.

(2) Without limiting subsection (1), any racing rules of a racing code may provide for—

(a) the appointment, functions, and duties of stipendiary stewards and racecourse inspectors; and
(b) the licensing of trainers, jockeys, drivers, and apprentices, and related matters; and
(c) the registration of horses, greyhounds, owners, partnerships, syndicates, and colours; and
(d) the conduct and control of race meetings, including safety requirements; and
(e) prize money and other stakes, programmes, entries, withdrawals, weights, penalties, handicapping, allowances, weighing, starting, and running; and
(f) punishments for breaches of the rules; and
(g) determinations and appeals; and
(h) disqualifications and suspensions; and
(i) any other matters relating to the conduct of races and racing that the racing code thinks fit.
Edited by curious
  • Like 1
Posted

Total bullshit then - surely if you dope a horse with a jockey on top or driver behind and I get bet on it then penalty the same .

I guess Private Schools v’s Public Schools spell treatment!

Posted

Harness...read Gypsy types...

Are the only ones who rope a dope I'm afraid....

Thoroughbred types are superior in every way....and shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath...

just sayin'

Posted

Actually these Thoroughbred trainers who are too lazy to check what gear their neddys have on...

...or their memory sucks...

...should be fined like the Gypsey's they are...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...