Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Down In grade - $$$


mardigras

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, mardigras said:

Still nothing I see. Oh sorry,  you've got one example to supposedly support your notion. That's all you ever have. Stupid one off examples post race.

That's just further evidence that you are out of your depth. The information I put up wipes your entire idea and throws it down the toilet with the rest of your crap.

 

 

Mardi, how is it possible that one guy can be so thick? I think its got to the point where even he doesn't believe some of the shit he is putting up on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, barryb said:

Mardi, how is it possible that one guy can be so thick? I think its got to the point where even he doesn't believe some of the shit he is putting up on here.

Yep, as discussed, he must just get off on having people respond to him. It has to be a wind up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mardigras said:

Still nothing I see. Oh sorry,  you've got one example to supposedly support your notion. That's all you ever have. Stupid one off examples post race.

That's just further evidence that you are out of your depth. The information I put up wipes your entire idea and throws it down the toilet with the rest of your crap.

 

 

I matched the two you gave me....you continually with FF...which you haven't got the foggiest idea about...as you don't do unlucky

Your whole 'speed' premise falls flat on its fake face though...

..when you include examples such as that 2yo maiden race being a superior performance to a HQ G 1

...which I've proved beyond doubt was superior...

the only apples with apples you do is rotten to the core

fake times fake news

Youre the Trump of the punting industry...no wonder you and your bff don't bother betting here

next

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, barryb said:

Mardi, how is it possible that one guy can be so thick? I think its got to the point where even he doesn't believe some of the shit he is putting up on here.

The only thing you bring to the table is bogan Bazz...

No evidence based vindictive...just smack talk a 5 yo kid does who can't figure a good chup from a rancid one..

...have another Wakachunga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thomass said:

The only thing you bring to the table is bogan Bazz...

No evidence based vindictive...just smack talk a 5 yo kid does who can't figure a good chup from a rancid one..

...have another Wakachunga

I can't engage with those who are too thick to see past themselves T, you post absolute cock and its tiring reading.

Mardi is a little more tolerant than me of stupidity, I on the other hand just completely dismiss you as a total f wit. Actually I am sure Mardi does too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, barryb said:

I can't engage with those who are too thick to see past themselves T, you post absolute cock and its tiring reading.

Mardi is a little more tolerant than me of stupidity, I on the other hand just completely dismiss you as a total f wit. Actually I am sure Mardi does too.

You keep on proving bogan is as bogan does bazz

Keep smacking and I'll keep smacking you harder...that's all bogans understand

...no debate, no facts, just smack

50 plus losers and you can hack that in your punting uh?

next

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Thomass said:

I matched the two you gave me....you continually with FF...which you haven't got the foggiest idea about...as you don't do unlucky

I didn't give two examples about why your claim is false. You are seriously confused.

You are going on about my assessment of a runner. The info I presented is unrelated to what I think of the performance of any horse. 

It IS the actual performance of horses in black type compared to actual times for the same track/condition/distance based on where those black type performances sat compared to all runners.

I knew you didn't understand it. So I'll spell it out.

Black type performers that don't run up to a level of performance(something you stated to be universal), do not perform well when racing down in grade subsequent to that black type performance. The slower, the worse the results are. Understand? No, didn't think so.

Performance trumps class - and massively so. It's there - only you don't comprehend it as remedial maths is a long way off completion for you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mardigras said:

Performance trumps class - and massively so. It's there - only you don't comprehend it as remedial maths is a long way off completion for you.

Read that again Thommo, along with the previous bit from mardigras that I highlighted for you since you don't understand the actual numbers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, mardigras said:

I didn't give two examples about why your claim is false. You are seriously confused.

You are going on about my assessment of a runner. The info I presented is unrelated to what I think of the performance of any horse. 

It IS the actual performance of horses in black type compared to actual times for the same track/condition/distance based on where those black type performances sat compared to all runners.

I knew you didn't understand it. So I'll spell it out.

Black type performers that don't run up to a level of performance(something you stated to be universal), do not perform well when racing down in grade subsequent to that black type performance. The slower, the worse the results are. Understand? No, didn't think so.

Performance trumps class - and massively so. It's there - only you don't comprehend it as remedial maths is a long way off completion for you.

And you're too thick to understand the point I'm drumming into you

Your stats are az fake az Kimmy Kardashians ass here

You can't possibly compare NZ times on completely different tracks and correlate that to prove jot...where HQ...has an undulating slower track...yet where many Black Types are run

...Put your crazy database to work on HK's two tracks statsman

...then we may have apples with apples...

until then it's all fake news...and you're too shit scared to put your NZ 'speed' stats to work on the punt

..you're a fake flake here...

Performance, class and Black Type are like Blue f in cheese and crackers

But you're too crackers to understand

Edited by Thomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Thomass said:

And you're too thick to understand the point I'm drumming into you

You can't possibly compare NZ times on completely different tracks and correlate that to prove jot...where HQ...has an undulating slower track...yet where many Black Types are run

 

Sorry, are you attempting to say something intelligent to me?

I haven't compared NZ times on completely different tracks. Where have i done that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/08/2018 at 2:55 PM, Thomass said:

Of course you cant compare times from different tracks...the above example just shows you...idiot

I don't do time at all...you do...

 

On 14/08/2018 at 4:28 PM, Thomass said:

Of course each rating band has its own superior speed rating to the next...

 

On 14/08/2018 at 9:58 PM, Thomass said:

Theres stock standard times in HK. And Singapore, for example, as they move through...

 

On 15/08/2018 at 10:39 PM, Thomass said:

All punters know about universal times for each class....

That's why you hear "that was above/ below standard time" after each race on these international meetings...

 

On 16/08/2018 at 2:41 PM, Thomass said:

..but thats why I don't use times...

I use the class of race...that will negate any other variances because almost always...these superior Black Type races are run at a good clip in bigger fields...where more can go wrong..

 

21 hours ago, Thomass said:

'Time' is a figment of your wild imagination

 

14 hours ago, Thomass said:

You can't possibly compare NZ times on completely different tracks and correlate that to prove jot...where HQ...has an undulating slower track...yet where many Black Types are run

...then we may have apples with apples...

Looks to me like Thomass has single-handedly argued successfully against his own stupid idea. He'd make a great lawyer - for opposing council.

The performance data I put up was exactly what he wants. Apples with apples. It is based on runs in black type at a track such as Ellerslie compared to ONLY runs at Ellerslie, same condition, same distance. Where they fall outside the 'universal times'  for each class at that track ONLY. There is no comparison in any of that, between a horse running at Ellerslie and a horse running at Trentham. There is no comparison between a horse running on a track rated 6 with a track rated 3. It is solely track/condition/distance based (as was mentioned - but the remedial reading class isn't helping Thomass).

He doesn't do time. But he also doesn't know when a performance is outside the 'universal time' for each class.

It is the funniest thing. An aside from all that, he has openly admitted he cannot in any way compare a maiden that ran over 1200m at Trentham with a maiden that ran over 1200m at Ellerslie. He just uses a dartboard when they meet. No wonder he came back on this site last night and read this thread - and didn't write anything. He's shot himself in the foot with his lack of punting knowledge. He's a novice - and a fraud.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/08/2018 at 9:35 PM, Thomass said:

And you're too thick to understand the point I'm drumming into you

Your stats are az fake az Kimmy Kardashians ass here

You can't possibly compare NZ times on completely different tracks and correlate that to prove jot...where HQ...has an undulating slower track...yet where many Black Types are run

...Put your crazy database to work on HK's two tracks statsman

...then we may have apples with apples...

until then it's all fake news...and you're too shit scared to put your NZ 'speed' stats to work on the punt

..you're a fake flake here...

Performance, class and Black Type are like Blue f in cheese and crackers

But you're too crackers to understand

88X89
 
My Tommy(6g Towkay (AUS) - Love Proposal)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we have a few runners today (even I Suggest!!). I can imagine the response if that wins. I've added the special indicator for black type specials. And time of race to avoid missing out! Those having performed to the universal black type level - finishing with 5L of the winner. Enjoy.

Track race easterntime # runnername class black type special
Te Rapa 1 12:45:00 PM 1 ASSIGN  OPEN *
Te Rapa 1 12:45:00 PM 2 GALLANTE  OPEN *
Te Rapa 1 12:45:00 PM 4 JOCHEN RINDT  OPEN *
Te Rapa 1 12:45:00 PM 6 YOUWANTMORE  OPEN *
Te Rapa 2 1:20:00 PM 2 MY GIFT  BM65  
Te Rapa 2 1:20:00 PM 9 PRODIGAL SON  BM65  
Waverley 2 1:41:00 PM 2 KOTAHI  BM65  
Waverley 2 1:41:00 PM 7 MISS LIZZIE  BM65  
Te Rapa 3 1:55:00 PM 2 HE'S CAVALIER  BM82 *
Te Rapa 3 1:55:00 PM 3 WAIPIPI LAD  BM82 *
Te Rapa 3 1:55:00 PM 4 GRAND RIO  BM82 *
Te Rapa 3 1:55:00 PM 5 ANGEL IN BLUEJEANS  BM82 *
Waverley 3 2:16:00 PM 2 TICKET CLIPPER  BM72  
Waverley 3 2:16:00 PM 3 NITRO TED  BM72  
Waverley 3 2:16:00 PM 4 EVA JENSINE  BM72  
Waverley 4 2:49:00 PM 2 BATABULLET  BM72  
Waverley 4 2:49:00 PM 3 CHOICE ATTITUDE  BM72  
Waverley 4 2:49:00 PM 5 BROTHER ONE  BM72  
Waverley 4 2:49:00 PM 6 COOL MOON  BM72  
Waverley 4 2:49:00 PM 8 GLORY DAYS  BM72  
Te Rapa 5 3:05:00 PM 2 STACCATO  BM72  
Te Rapa 5 3:05:00 PM 5 OHCEEDEE  BM72 *
Te Rapa 5 3:05:00 PM 7 GRIS DAME  BM72 *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 2 DOLCETTO  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 3 LADIES FIRST  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 4 DUFFERS CREEK  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 5 RINGO  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 6 SAMPSON  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 7 DARCI MAC  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 8 NYMPH MONTE  OPEN *
Waverley 5 3:24:00 PM 9 HELLO M'LADY  OPEN *
Waverley 6 3:59:00 PM 1 DURHAM  BM65  
Waverley 6 3:59:00 PM 4 THAT'S FUNNY  BM65  
Waverley 6 3:59:00 PM 11 DO YA  BM65  
Waverley 7 4:34:00 PM 5 ONEFORTHEDITCH  BM65  
Waverley 7 4:34:00 PM 6 MR COOL BOY  BM65  
Waverley 7 4:34:00 PM 9 MASTER PATRICK  BM65  
Waverley 7 4:34:00 PM 11 I SUGGEST  BM65  
Te Rapa 8 4:50:00 PM 4 GABRIEL  BM65  
Te Rapa 8 4:50:00 PM 7 ARTISTE  BM65  
Te Rapa 8 4:50:00 PM 8 BLACK LACE  BM65  
Te Rapa 8 4:50:00 PM 9 PEARLESCENCE  BM65  
Te Rapa 8 4:50:00 PM 11 MASTER GENIE  BM65  

 

Edited by mardigras
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wtf is this shit?

Ive spent a beautiful day visiting a Gannet colony and this post has more bird/s than the 20,000 squawking feathered ones crap in a year

...while you're in the lock up tossing salad, stalking to see if I'm here...

...and incredibly...you posted this last shit just before WINX ran...

Some supposed neddys I would have invested on...all a figment of your warped chemically induced mind..get help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mardi, none of the results are valid  as the penotometer reading is unreliable and both the tracks have terrible bias. Not helped by the fact the jockeys seem to not know where to ride on both tracks, they go to early or too wide.

Its all a little too unfair and I feel the results are best voided. Thomass’s Results are far superior and I think it’s best to just take them as being true and correct.

Either that or he deliberately told us all this false information to throw us off the real trail of how he manages an incredibly high success rate.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will be on here in a few hours with his usual Monday morning rave, it’s going to be entertaining. A few new ideas or tweaks will appear to make up for the shite results over the last 2 weeks.

For a guy who is so racing mad, he seems to not spend many Saturday’s watching them or is never at the track, he’s a fraud methinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, barryb said:

Mardi, none of the results are valid  as the penotometer reading is unreliable and both the tracks have terrible bias. Not helped by the fact the jockeys seem to not know where to ride on both tracks, they go to early or too wide.

Its all a little too unfair and I feel the results are best voided. Thomass’s Results are far superior and I think it’s best to just take them as being true and correct.

Either that or he deliberately told us all this false information to throw us off the real trail of how he manages an incredibly high success rate.

To be fair, Mr T. will claim only 4 horses met his personal criteria...the 4 winners

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mardigras said:

Finally we all agree. This shit is what matches your blue print for down in grade. And there is no doubt, it is shit.
Good to see you catching on.

The problem is your mental condition of being obcessed with moi..

Compulsive obcessive disorder...

...includes stalking posters to see when they're on and off the site...and then ignoring champions like WINX...

...2 minutes before the start...so you can post your drivel...

Go for a walk...get a new hobby...then change the meds...the present ones ain't doing the job

Dont make it the Whakachunga med bogan Bazz is on though...

...the sheet that comes from his mouth needs to go through the oxidation ponds...

..and even then it'll still be sheet

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure I can do more than one thing at a time. 

As for you, I knew you had totally screwed yourself as usual. I come on here to reinforce it due to you actually thinking you know things about punting. NZ racing is having enough difficulty attracting punters without reading your crap.

Black type blah blah blah. You're full of it. Shit that is.

You love stats. Cos you're stupid. Would you like the stats from just Black Type HQ performances?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...