Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn
  • Blog Entries

         0 comments
      Duplicate to remove spam.
         15 comments
      Today we have seen the only remaining truly independent racing industry publication "hang the bridle on the wall."  The Informant has ceased to publish.
      Why?
      In my opinion the blame lies firmly at the feet of the NZRB.  Over the next few days BOAY will be asking some very pertinent questions to those in charge.
      For example:
      How much is the NZRB funded Best Bets costing the industry?  Does it make a profit?  What is its circulation?  800?  Or more?  Does the Best Bets pay for its form feeds?  Was The Informant given the same deal?
      How much does the industry fund the NZ Racing Desk for its banal follow the corporate line journalism?
      Why were the "manager's at the door" when Dennis Ryan was talking to Peter Early?
      Where are the NZ TAB turnover figures?
      The Informant may be gone for the moment but the industry must continue to ask the hard questions.
       
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found


  • Posts

    • So that's why the colt is getting time off to relax?
    • You do know that Ignorance is not a defence in a Law Court, why should it be in Racing?
    • Te Akau’s Australian ambition is only just getting started By Matt Stewart - November 22, 2024 Te Akau has already made a major mark on Australian racing in the 18 months since setting up base at Cranbourne. But David Ellis’ Australian plan is far from realised, writes Matt Stewart. David Ellis, Ben Gleeson and Mark Walker, the three key men behind Te Akau's Australian operation, alongside Xavier Walker. (Photo by Vince Caligiuri/Getty Images) It was lunchtime on June 20, 2023 and Ben Gleeson had sweaty palms as he sat at a table for two at France-Soir, a swanky restaurant in Toorak Road. For the 29-year-old, this might prove the lunch of a lifetime. Gleeson had chosen the restaurant and by the time the souffle arrived for dessert, Mark Walker had chosen Gleeson as the frontman for Te Akau Racing’s inevitable entry into Australian racing. Gleeson had hoped that the entre of his strong CV and main course of the perfect steak might nudge Walker over the line and secure him a coveted gig. Te Akau was elite. They’d had more champions or near-champions than many far bigger Australian outfits. Between 2017 and 2023, Te Akau-trained horses won every edition of the rich Karaka Million while bombing Australian carnivals with stars like Probabeel, Melody Belle and Avantage. Before them, it was Te Akau Nick, Distinctly Secret, Princess Coup and Darci Brahma. The tangerine team has deep pockets and paid a ready-to-run record $1.65 million for an I Am Invincible colt in New Zealand on Wednesday. It has long been the biggest New Zealand buyer at the annual Karaka Yearling Sale. In May this year, Te Akau sold its champion mare Imperatriz for an Australasian record $6.6 million at a Gold Coast broodmare sale. Te Akau and its founder David Ellis was a famous New Zealand success story. Ellis took $12 to the Ellerslie races in 1971 and walked out with $84. Beginner’s luck on the punt would focus his ambitions on thoroughbreds instead of cattle and sheep. By 2023, Ellis had built a racing empire that required one more giant leap; a deep footprint into Australia. This would be his greatest challenge. Te Akau pulls out all stops for record-breaking $1.65 million colt at Karaka Newcomers to the training ranks would now be confronted with the unprecedented dominance of Ciaron Maher and Chris Waller, two of 3600 licensed trainers. Te Akau’s Australian operation would have to be carefully constructed. Ellis’ business partner and Te Akau’s head trainer Walker sat across from Gleeson at France-Soir and considered both the applicant and the menu. Gleeson had done his due diligence, gleaning a great deal about Walker’s training and a little about his diet. “Mark loves a steak,” Gleeson said. “He ordered a nice steak and some beers straight away and I felt I could relax a little. We were there for probably two hours. He wanted to know my journey and me his. We spoke about the business of running a Cranbourne stable and I knew in my heart straight away that this was the place I wanted to be.” Ellis was a start-up success story like few others. In the Easter of 1971 he was studying farm agriculture and working three jobs – at the freezer work and as a house painter and petrol station attendant. He saved and saved and in 1979 bought 575 acres in the Waimai Valley. He later bought surrounding farmland and created Te Akau Stud. He bought his first horse in 1983 and syndicated them under Te Akau Racing. David Ellis (right) alongside Coolmore Australia principal Tom Magnier. (Photo: Magic Millions). Walker was a young trainer who’d walked up Ellis’ driveway and asked for a job. Ellis took a punt on the quietly spoken youngster and by 2010, Walker had won five New Zealand premierships for Te Akau, which the following January opened a satellite stable in Singapore. Walker relocated and won four premierships. The impending closure of Singapore racing and the departure of Te Akau’s champion young Kiwi trainer Jamie Richards to Hong Kong paved the way for Walker’s return. Last year, another young, emerging horseman, Sam Bergerson joined Walker as co-trainer for the New Zealand operation.   “I knew the story of Mark walking up David’s driveway looking for a job and I knew that David was great at giving young people an opportunity,” Gleeson said. “I had nothing to lose.” Gleeson had been raised on a horse farm near Seymour, worked for trainers Lee and Shannon Hope as a teenager, studied business management at Uni, had been a stable-hand for Peter Moody (Dave Eustace was his immediate boss), rode out at Newmarket as a foreman for Hugo Palmer and spent five years with Danny O’Brien at Flemington. Mate Calvin McEvoy nudged Gleeson to email Ellis. Renowned bloodstock man Henry Plumptre, in charge of Cambridge Stud, put in a good word for him. “The email was short and simple. I told David that I felt ready to train and would love to be part of Te Akau,” he said. “Within 24 hours I’d got a call from Mark. He told me they were opening a stable at Cranbourne. Next thing you know, we are at France-Soir planning the Cranbourne operation. I really felt Mark and I clicked.” Te Akau had two stables in New Zealand and Ellis felt an Australian base would take the business “to the next level”. Speaking from Karaka on Wednesday just after Te Akau paid $1.65 million for the I Am Invincible colt, Ellis said the team under Gleeson would be the shop window for Te Akau. “I went all around the training centres and we concluded that Cranbourne was head and shoulders above the rest and would be the place we would launch the operation,” he said. Ben Gleeson and Mark Walker have quickly formed a strong understanding, despite often being on opposite sides of the Tasman. (Photo by Vince Caligiuri/Getty Images) Perceptions that Te Akau was a private stable had been hard to shake. Ellis’ high profile as syndicate head had made it seem that way. But the big studs and owners moved Te Akau’s way. Thirty boxes at Cranbourne will become 70 in the next fortnight when the new barn is completed. Ellis said Walker had been with him “since the day he left school” and looked forward to Gleeson’s development. “Ben is very well regarded in Australia and has been a big help in setting up the business. We have the best work riders, the best staff,” Ellis said. Gleeson had underestimated the breadth of the role. “At times I felt I was juggling eight balls in the air. I had to start a business from scratch, from staff applications to Racing Victoria, to acquiring treadmills, sourcing feeds, gear, machinery,” he said. “It sort of blew my mind but I wouldn’t have had it any other way. I feel I know every corner of the business. I have to admit I didn’t realise I had it in me.” Gleeson sought out trusted former Moody workmate Jason Levin as foreman. Staff gravitated to a stable that Gleeson says operated on a “happy staff, happy horse” mantra. On virtually the same day Levin arrived, so did Imperatriz. It was August 2023. Walker had been impressed with Gleeson’s results at Cranbourne and quickly afforded him a degree of autonomy. Gleeson’s fingerprints were all over Imperatriz as she charged through the spring of 2023 and the autumn of 2024. “Mark is a remarkable trainer. I picked up a few things along the way too and I find we have very fruitful discussions about how we want the horses trained. I listen a great deal to him but he’s allowed strong input from me,” Gleeson said. Ellis described Imperatriz as “an amazing horse who came along at a very important time for us” and Gleeson said such rare horses “were the reason people like me want to train”. Imperatriz had trialled poorly at Cranbourne a fortnight before she was to resume in the Black Caviar Lightning in February this year. There were sleepless nights. “I was a bit worried. Mark just says trust what you see and that she’s a race-day mare,” Gleeson said. “She had a body that wasn’t easy to manage. We had two weeks to figure our way through it. We grew in confidence. Driving to Flemington Mark asked 'what’s your gut feel?' "I said 'I think she will win'. She did, brilliantly." Imperatriz was sold for $6.6 million at the end of her brilliant racing career. (Photo: Vince Caliguri/Getty Images) Imperatriz has left the stable and Blake Shinn has wandered into it. Shinn rode track and trials for Te Akau in New Zealand last week and will be seen regularly in the famous tangerine. Like Imperatriz, Shinn is good for the brand. He believes Te Akau will become a giant slayer. “If they can emulate in Australia what they’ve done in New Zealand they will be huge,” Shinn said. “They’ve already done it here with Imperatriz and other horses. You can see where they’re heading. “I spent some time with David in New Zealand and learned a lot about him and his vision. In two years’ time people will be saying 'wow, where did they come from?'”
    • Ryan Moore is looking forward to returning to Hong Kong. Photo: HKJC If you go back to 2006 when Ryan Moore made his International Jockeys’ Championship (IJC) debut, it was Olivier Peslier who took home the trophy ahead of Glen Boss and Andreas Suborics at the end of what was undoubtedly a good night for the visitors. Moore finished sixth on that occasion and, in a remarkable sequence, has contested every edition since with the exception of 2008. And off the back of another stellar year in which his 19 Group 1 winners have included a Derby Stakes (2400m), Eclipse Stakes (1990m) and International Stakes (2051m) treble with City Of Troy, Moore could yet be crowned World’s Best Jockey two days after the IJC if Auguste Rodin makes it 20 for the season in Sunday’s Group 1 Japan Cup (2400m). “I’ve always seen it as a privilege to be asked to ride in the LONGINES IJC and all the time I’m able to and I’m wanted, I’ll never say no,” says Moore. “If you don’t want to ride here, then I don’t know. It’s the best jockeys’ challenge and a great week, and I always like to hope I’ll be riding on the Sunday in the LONGINES HKIR races.” All that said, Moore’s run of appearances in this HK$1 million challenge includes wins in 2009 and 2010, as well as podium finishes on another four occasions, and speaks to a jockey who feels plenty of affinity with this unique city layout. “Racing in Hong Kong is probably the most competitive in the world and I’m always delighted to take part when I’m asked,” says Moore, who admits that the tight nature of the handicaps which make up the four legs of the IJC can be a double-edged sword. Asked if the open nature of the racing means he always approaches the evening believing he has a half a chance, Moore says: “Yeah, but you’ve also got half a chance of not doing very well. You might get a good horse and then get a bad draw. “There’s so many variables and you could get lucky on one that’s maybe not quite as good but who gets a nice run round and nick a win as well. “You do always have a chance because it’s that sort of track and the horses are evenly matched. But there could just be a standout in one leg, one that’s ahead of his mark, that’s just the nature of racing.” While the IJC gives the Happy Valley fans the chance to see some of the world’s best fly in to face off, for Moore the standard is set by those jockeys who earn their living there every week of the season. Douglas Whyte was the Hong Kong maestro when Moore first began visiting, while he has since enjoyed measuring himself against Joao Moreira, Zac Purton and defending IJC champion Vincent Ho. “The riders in Hong Kong are top class and they always have been,” says Moore. “Zac looks to have started this season going probably as well as he’s ever done. He’s always very hard to beat, just as Joao and Douglas were. “Hughie (Bowman) and Vincent are the same, every one of them is very capable of getting the job done.” Moore will also be a major player during the biggest meeting of the year at Sha Tin on Sunday, December 8, which features the four Hong Kong International Races, worth HK$126 million. He came within a short head of landing the feature Group 1 Hong Kong Cup (2000m) 12 months ago with Luxembourg, only to become the latest to discover just how hard it is to get the better of the remarkable Romantic Warrior. Hong Kong’s reigning horse of the year has since recorded a second top-level success abroad in the Group 1 Yasuda Kinen (1600m) at Tokyo in June, and warmed up for his hat-trick bid in the Hong Kong Cup with a bloodless 4.25 length win in the Group 2 BOCHK Jockey Club Cup (2000m) on November 17. “(Trainer) Danny (Shum) has done a great job and I think James (McDonald) rides him beautifully,” says Moore. “He’s an uncomplicated horse who starts very well, they can position him wherever they want to. He doesn’t over-race, he relaxes. He’s very professional, he’s all business and has a great will to win. “He does everything right at the moment and that’s why he’s very hard to beat.” Reflecting on last year’s titanic Hong Kong Cup battle, Moore added: “I felt if I’d had another stride on Luxembourg, I was probably up. Any horse is beatable on the day but he’s going to be very hard to beat.” Turning to prospects for the Group 1 Hong Kong Sprint (1200m), Moore has been equally taken with the rise of David Hayes-trained Ka Ying Rising, who broke Sacred Kingdom’s track record for 1200m of 17 years by clocking 1:07.43 (0.07s faster) in the Group 2 Jockey Club Sprint on the same card last Sunday. “Similar comments apply to Ka Ying Rising, who was seriously impressive on Sunday,” says Moore. “He seems to just do everything correctly in the race; he gets out and puts himself where Zac wants to be. “When they’ve got that it’s a massive advantage but all the races on International day have usually got full fields and so you never know what can happen.” Horse racing news View the full article
    • The Beat and Vantage hope to offer the digital, dining and racing experience that the new generation wants.View the full article
    • what you recon?? By Warwick Barr - November 20, 2024 A Ladbrokes account holder has failed in his bid to be paid $30,000 in winnings because he had been acting on behalf of a third party, a wagering regulator has found. Ladbrokes denied the punter's withdrawal request on the grounds as it believed he was operating it for someone else. (Photo: Natasha Morello/Racing Photos via Getty Images). In deciding whether the bets placed by the successful punter were lawful, the Northern Territory Racing and Wagering Commission (NTRWC) says Ladbrokes was within its rights to deny a withdrawal request. Under its terms and conditions, Ladbrokes refused the punters’ attempts to collect the five-figure sum on evidence he was operating what is colloquially known in the wagering industry as a “bowler account”. “Bowler” accounts are those in which the owner is known to place bets for other people. Anecdotally, their use in the Australian corporate wagering landscape has become prevalent in recent years, with winning gamblers trying to circumvent bookmaker restrictions by using third parties. “In the Commission’s view … it is plausible that the complainant’s Ladbrokes’ betting account was likely on the balance of probabilities to have been funded and/or operated by a person who was not the complainant,” the NTRWC said in its findings against the punter. “Having formed this view, the Commission has determined that Ladbrokes’ invocations of its terms and conditions by way of voiding the complainants’ bets and not paying out on any winnings is justified.” A hearing was told the punter deposited $6600 into his Ladbrokes account which was used to place bets on November 22 and 23 and December 6 in 2022. He later wished to withdraw $30,000.  In an online complaint to the NTRWC less than a month later, the punter said he was the only person involved in using the Ladbrokes account. He said he met a request from the bookmaker to provide a financial statement, claiming Ladbrokes did not process the withdrawal because the bookmaker believed another person was using the betting account based on third-party bank deposits. Ladbrokes argued the complaint did not fall within the parameters and scope of the Commission’s jurisdiction and suggested that the punter seek legal advice if he wanted to pursue the matter. But in a written submission to the investigation, Ladbrokes said the wagering account was operated in breach of the company’s terms and conditions. Irish hurling, US elections and minor Euro football leagues - all in a day’s work for NT betting regulator Ladbrokes submitted that it suspected a telephone conversation on December 8 2022, was unlikely to be the account holder “but a person identifying as the complainant instead”. “The variations in speech patterns and other indicators observed during the phone calls … appear to support Ladbrokes’ view that different individuals may have been speaking,” the NTRWC said. Ladbrokes claimed there were also bank statement discrepancies and confirmation of third-party deposits around the time the punter funded his betting account. It also tabled evidence that the mobile telephone number the aggrieved punter wanted to be registered to his account to validate the withdrawal process belonged to another account holder of the wagering firm. A request to change the mobile telephone number to have it registered to the account to comply with a two-factor authentication wasn’t met. Ladbrokes closed the customer’s account two days later, informing the punter he was ineligible to receive any funds. “The Commission notes that when asked about who the mobile phone belonged to during a phone conversation between Ladbrokes and the complainant, the complainant advised that it belonged to a family member and he did not know if that person held a betting account with Ladbrokes,” the NTRWC said. Ladbrokes confirmed that it had refunded the punter’s deposit of $4000. However, earlier contributions made to the account via Flexepin, a global financial product used for online transactions, were not returned because Ladbrokes claimed it couldn’t determine how the vouchers were purchased. NT law changes put additional heat on corporate bookmakers The Commission said Ladbrokes’ decision not to refund Flexepin deposits aligned with the company’s terms and conditions. A Flexepin prepaid voucher system allows users to make secure payments without needing funds to be linked to a credit card or bank account. The punter said he used the Flexepin method while travelling overseas but a Ladbrokes review showed transactions between November 23 and November 28 were made in Australia. “These Australian-based transactions conflict with the statements made by the complainant to Ladbrokes about his betting account usage,” the NTRWC said. In handing down its decision in October, the Commission agreed to Ladbrokes’ request not to disclose potentially sensitive information concerning the third-party operation of the account, saying it could “compromise” ongoing and future investigations into third-party activities.
    • actually the whole china export thing i find rather perplexing. There was a 3 part story written for the paulick report,published just 2 months ago,about the expanding connection between the american thoroughbred industry and the chinese. it was very interesting,but if you think about what was said in that series of articles,while harness racing wasn't discussed ,it left me with more questions than possible answers. Like questions about understanding the thinking of the chinese. Comparethere approach to growing the thoriughbred industry there and how that doesn't mirror the same thing with harness horses being purchased from here. Like obviously nz and australia have the advantage of the free trade agreement and australia in particular, apparently spend a lot of time and money promoting the purchase of yearlings ,by the chinese at their australian sales. But like i say,from the articles written in that paulick report,you have to ask if the chinese are genuinely interested in establishing the harness industry over there,doesn't it make you question,if they are genuine,look at who they are purchasing here and the prices they are paying, given how much they will be spending on getting the horses back to china. like its a whole different approach from what they are doing with their thoroughbreds. like,the most obvious is,why have they mostly been buying older broodmares when they are supposed to be buying racing stock. I know the most recent batch on the export list,as they include a lot of 3 and 4 year old mares,but that hasn't been the case previously. why haven't they,like their thoroughbred counterparts ,been buying yearlings and why haven't the sales companies here or in australia thought it worthwhile to promote chinese interest to any degree in the yealing sales held over here.   seemingly the americans should have an advantage with the thoroughbreds as  most tracks in china aren't turf,but are dirt type tracks. so doesn't that make you wonder,what about the harness tracks and exactly where are they and what surfaces are they. theres heaps of other questions you could ask with no apparent readily known answers. Thats why i personally think the whole china export thing has a lot of mystery around it,with not only possible good,but also bad scenarios that may play out. Maybe the saying,ignorance is bliss,is the approach some sellers are taking as they can't possibly know tyhe exact use or the fate of those they are selling.
    • Disqualification is/has always been available to RIB for any egregious breach of a rule. The advantage of the whip is impossible define, varying between horses and riders. And DQ for miscounting/timing is nonsense
×
×
  • Create New...