holy ravioli

48 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

I agree.

Just donate to the Natz...and it will be..done!

3 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

No I'm not bashing JMac.  Just doing a comparison.  You are bashing Parr.  Scary ran faster sectionals than Parr's horse.  He was on its back and couldn't keep up.

The last 200??

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

So did the winner and the second horse finish at a great rate.  Some said the winner went too early.  He sat one out and got a drag into the race - presented at the right time on a very long straight.  Perhaps those in front of him were better.  Or are you talking about JMac's ride?

Suggest you rewatch the race and watch the run of Scary.  Parr's horse was on its back turning for home and couldn't go with it.  

https://www.racing.com/form/2024-11-02/flemington/race/7

At no stage did Parr have the option of going to the inside.  

Finished faster than any of the others.Winners never go 'too early'.

I see you still enjoy JMac bashing.Some things never change.

Todays NZ Herald has all the numbers screwed up....Vauben is number 3...Kovalia 9...they are all wrong.No surprise I guess.😬

2 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

How was it woeful?

JMac's wasn't very good.  His horse drew 1.  Parr's horse drew 16 in a 16 horse field.  What was he supposed to do press on forward four wide early? 

Came home at a great rate.Could have gone forward or went to the inside ..it was 2500m after all.

His Derby ride was...woeful!

15 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Yep and they cut out the peasants with privileged entry.

Are 'peasants' allowed to join BGP?

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

What average?  DC's or the whole sale?  Can't you read?  I said the "value sweet spot was around $230k" - nothing about averages!  

So what!The average for the sale...not your hero.😁

Who cares about your 'sweet spot'.

2 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

I see DC I pitching around the $230k mark.  That could be the value sweet spot this sale.

The average is just under 200k.

10 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

You have dementia as well?  

Just produce it...you know you can't...give up 'Second'....this is NOT your forte.

8 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Once again you obfuscate the debate by coming up with a counterfactual that's totally irrelevant.

What's defending the high seas got to do with getting rid of a terrorist murdering bunch of of religious zealots?

You are a Green supporter aren't you?  Or are you Chloe in drag

I did not write that article.The author explains the connection.

Maybe you should just go and clean your gumboots.

11 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Really?  How?  Give us all one reason to trust Putin or Xi Jinping?

Let one Iran!

As for the USA it wasn't long ago you were telling us they have no power or influence.  Make your mind up.  It's like arguing with a schizophrenic!

Try living in India, Russia or China.  Actually please do.

Citation needed-'As for the USA it wasn't long ago you were telling us they have no power or influence. '

Making shit up...AGAIN.🙄

As for principles,this-'By agreeing to send an NZDF team to the Red Sea without demanding the US end its opposition to a ceasefire in Gaza, the New Zealand government seems to have retreated from an independent foreign policy based on principles and values.'

4 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Describing yourself.

Meanwhile more slogans and ideology.  No substance and a distinct reluctance to explain how BRICS is any good for the world.

We await.

We presently live in a uni polar world where the U.S reigns supreme.It gives any country 2 choices if they oppose -1-we will bomb you back to the Stoneage or 2-we will make your economy ...scream.

The BRICS seek to end this repugnant foreign policy.

Interesting observations.-'selective concern'.

New Zealand’s Red Sea deployment points to a selective concern over international law | Robert G. Patman | The Guardian

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

So how does that excuse your hypocrisy?  You've just agreed with what I posted.  You are only pro-BRICS because you are anti-Western Alliances.  To the point where you'd rather align with dictators, despots and the corrupt.

Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Ethiopia, Egypt, Iran and the UAE.

Do you have ANY principles?

No slogan,no hypocrisy.....!

You are a product of a lifetime of indoctrination.

You seem to think the world is black and white.

Capitalism- good-socialism-bad.Christianity -good,other religions- bad,faux democracy-good,faux freedom good.

Never fear Western Alliances will protect you from manufacture bogeymen.You do not understand how the world and Empire works.

Heres an American that worked for the state dept,explaining so a 5 y.o would understand.

Just now, Chief Stipe said:

I'm asking you to justify your BRICS slogan!!!!  Typical tactic by you when you can't.  You dream up a counterfactual and ask everyone else to justify it.  

Let's face it you are superficial and a hypocrite.  You promote BRICS only because it is anti all Western Alliances.

What was the 'slogan'?

FORBES(U.S.A)-'expansion will further establish the group as a counterbalance to the G7’s global influence, catapulting BRICS’ share of global GDP to 36% as well as covering nearly half of the world’s population. With dozens more nations expressing interest in joining the bloc, the BRICS are clearly positioning themselves for a multipolar world, one that is not dominated by the U.S. and other members of the West.'

1 minute ago, Chief Stipe said:

Hardly!  Whereas you throw out slogans that have no substance!

Tell us why the BRICS is THE group to belong to?  None of the countries in it have a civil/human rights record that you supposedly aspire to and are riddled with government and corporate corruption.

Too funny.

The U.S.A is   clearly riddled with corruption if you take off your blinders.

Look at the treatment of Julian Assange....dispicable.

10 minutes ago, Doomed said:

There is a difference between being up on the pace and actually leading. I think most of the winners raced handy, that was my impression anyhow.

I imagine a majority  of winners everywhere come from the first 6 or 7 runners.

What a headache...the light showers came after R3...I think.

20 minutes ago, Newmarket said:

I was right, very few made ground form the back yesterday….

Another leaders track, just what we need.

So which actual frontrunners ...won?

10 hours ago, Shad said:

Helps to be on the best horses I guess, how did the other top aussie riders go.

Blake Sinn=2 3rds and 1 2nd...divs-$4,$5.20 and $4.

Zahra 2nd on Pendragon $2.30.

No sign of Bosson.

11 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

Perhaps but I'd rather play with $100 myself.  Each to their own.  

What and get zero back!Surely you...jest.😄

53 minutes ago, Walt said:

apologies HR. I just assumed you had a basic comprehension of the English language.

Perhaps Chief may need to resort to crayons to assist you. 

 

God knows what this means!

The Chief jumps into topics and comments from a position of ignorance.

Your low calories contributions are getting ...almost as...bad.🙄

JMac...what a horseman.....love the way he gets horses to settle and come with the winning...run.👍

Both the big races today.