curious

Other than Cambridge, is there a track in New Zealand where the training operation isn't subsided?

Dead right about the head in the sand approach. That's what NZTR have being using for the last 2 decades whilst as a recent CEO told me, keeping on looking for the next pot of gold. They've tried the tax-payer, a corporate rescue, overseas product, pokies and now aiming at the online casino business. I'm afraid however, they may be coming to the end of a rainbow that has no pot of gold. Clubs were run as businesses for a century living on their own earnings. As with all industries a few ran into financial difficulties from time to time, but few actually went out of business because of that.

No idea about what happened. Ellis doesn't look that happy about it though.

What circumstances? Interference in the straight? Bloody good run I agree.

Are you questioning that I got them from bono? I can post them to prove I have them if you like. Minor sideshow really though, but quite funny if they did do 20 grand from a stuff up. Guess the new syndicate members will pay if so though.

Oh. I think I got those from Bono. Shall I post them?

I stand corrected on this. I was relying on the head post but when I read the original, I see there is actually a change to the existing rule as well as the addition.

Did it ever occur to you @Thomass that one of the reasons you might be a mug punter is that you let gossip from trainers influence your assessment of a horse's chance?

No I thought you were. So you've been abused by him?

Oops that should have read busyness.

I frankly don't know anyone who has. Is that a yes? You have?

Huh? Are you trying to prove yourself wrong?

The industry doesn't employ them though nor pay them. How do you think it would go down if it were made a requirement of a trainer's licence?

Isn't there something hypocritical about the above? You are attacking individual posters based on your assessment of their personality and motives. Why? Because you don't agree with the opinions they express?

Yet that is generally recommended by organisational social media experts. What do you think they should do instead? Ignore it even if they think it is having a negative impact on them?