Chief Stipe Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, curious said: Here's one for you in the first today to keep you going. I backed it too That picture proves SFA but I see @Comic Dog stole it so he can sing to the crickets. Quote
Freda Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: That picture proves SFA but I see @Comic Dog stole it so he can sing to the crickets. It proves that the whip is being used incorrectly. You can argue all you like, but the fact remains that our riders aren't being taught correctly and nor is the misuse being dealt with. Joe Doyle has appeared in a few pics..do you seriously think he'd get away with that at home? He knows he can get away with it here, is all. 1 Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Freda said: proves that the whip is being used incorrectly. In my opinion it proves nothing. A high definition slow motion replay may very well do that. But a screen shot of one video frame or part of a frame doesn't prove Jack. We don't even know the source of the video. What's more what is the Jockey doing with his or her whip in the other hand? I gather you and @curious won't be putting Joe Doyle up anytime soon? Quote
Thomass Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: In my opinion it proves nothing. A high definition slow motion replay may very well do that. But a screen shot of one video frame or part of a frame doesn't prove Jack. We don't even know the source of the video. What's more what is the Jockey doing with his or her whip in the other hand? I gather you and @curious won't be putting Joe Doyle up anytime soon? It shows JKB striking the flank with the non padded polymer/handle and the resultant indentation/welt left VERBOTEN Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Thomass said: It shows JKB striking the flank with the non padded polymer/handle and the resultant indentation/welt left VERBOTEN Here we go again...sigh. What is the definition of flank in the rules? Quote
curious Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: In my opinion it proves nothing. A high definition slow motion replay may very well do that. But a screen shot of one video frame or part of a frame doesn't prove Jack. We don't even know the source of the video. The source of mine is the NZTR race replay on their website. The stewards have the HD slo mo vid to inspect don't they? It's a part frame because I don't want to show 2 violations in one pic. 43 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: I gather you and @curious won't be putting Joe Doyle up anytime soon? No biggie. There's plenty who use it correctly or are trying to learn. Quote
Thomass Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said: Define flank? Between the ribs and the hip? The flank of a horse is located on the side of the horse, behind the rib cage and in front of the hind legs, specifically, the area between the barrel (ribcage) and the hindquarters. It's a sensitive area and is often described as a slightly indented space. Edited 5 hours ago by Thomass Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Apparently @curious you are "giving the crazies ammunition. What do you say to that? Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Thomass said: The flank of a horse is located on the side of the horse, behind the rib cage and in front of the hind legs, specifically, the area between the barrel (ribcage) and the hindquarters. It's a sensitive area and is often described as a slightly indented space. Is that from the rules? Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Thomass said: The flank of a horse is located on the side of the horse, behind the rib cage and in front of the hind legs, specifically, the area between the barrel (ribcage) and the hindquarters. It's a sensitive area and is often described as a slightly indented space. So on that basis some of the photos posted are misleading at best. But let's not drum up traffic with emotion. Quote
curious Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Apparently @curious you are "giving the crazies ammunition. What do you say to that? He said "unless we as an industry address this we are just giving the crazies ammunition" Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 45 minutes ago, curious said: He said "unless we as an industry address this we are just giving the crazies ammunition" But you are producing the ammo? Quote
curious Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago The ammo is aimed to get it addressed since direct attempts fall on deaf ears. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, curious said: The ammo is aimed to get it addressed since direct attempts fall on deaf ears. Fair enough. I don't agree with the base supposition but if you want to address it then don't do it on an online forum. You are just feeding the "Crazies" as @Comic Dog says. And the Journalists! I've seen that happen on BOAY's Greyhound forum. KEEP TALKING TO THOSE THAT ENFORCE THE RULES. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.