Amberley Cup rating 60+

[mikeynz]

2 nominations, then..........13 noms for 3 pacing races at Auckland, Wairio rating 50 to 70, how many ? But then also Sunday Horarata 46 to 70, programming all over the place, anything over rating 55 struggling.......strangely fields for Cambridge Wednesday generally good, I seriously wonder if going to Alexandra Park just don't appeal to many, prefer Cambridge.

[Brodie]

1 hour ago, mikeynz said:

2 nominations, then..........13 noms for 3 pacing races at Auckland, Wairio rating 50 to 70, how many ? But then also Sunday Horarata 46 to 70, programming all over the place, anything over rating 55 struggling.......strangely fields for Cambridge Wednesday generally good, I seriously wonder if going to Alexandra Park just don't appeal to many, prefer Cambridge.

Not that bad, not one nomination for the 2year old male pace for $17k!

HRNZ really need to pull their head out of the sand and stop denying the actual reality of what is happening?

If they dont then things are going to get very dire!

We need A spokesman for HRNZ to start conversing with the public as to how they think they can continue when the cash is all gooooone!

 

 

[mikeynz]

6 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Not that bad, not one nomination for the 2year old male pace for $17k!

HRNZ really need to pull their head out of the sand and stop denying the actual reality of what is happening?

If they dont then things are going to get very dire!

We need A spokesman for HRNZ to start conversing with the public as to how they think they can continue when the cash is all gooooone!

 

 

And the reality is, the money they race for ain't bad but why Cambridge Wednesday, Auckland Friday, ?

[mikeynz]

Every race or many races you see a wide band in the ratings just to get starters, rating 41s racing rating 50s, then FFAlls rating 62, racing rating 80s 90s or whatever, it's a mess. The old system while not perfect you know where you stood.

Edited 1 hour ago by mikeynz

[Brodie]

4 minutes ago, mikeynz said:

Every race or many races you see a wide band in the ratings just to get starters, rating 41s racing rating 50s, then FFAlls rating 62, racing rating 80s 90s or whatever, it's a mess. The old system while not perfect you know where you stood.

Correct the ratings band system does not work!

Most races has such a wide range so pointless when there is often 20 points difference?

They definitely need another brainstorming system and debate about the way things are tracking!