Biological and molecular evidence why children are effectively COVID immune and can be considered already vaccinated

[Chief Stipe]

 

PaulAlexanderSeptember 20, 2021

1 Comment

 

 

I argue there is biological and molecular evidence that is clear on why children are effectively COVID immune and can be considered already vaccinated. Yes, already vaccinated and need no COVID vaccine. Leave them alone. COVID injections offer children no opportunity for benefit and only potential opportunities for harms. Children must not be vaccinated with these COVID vaccines, the key issue is they are not needed. No public health official has yet made an argument as to why children are to get these vaccines. Moreover, the developers have not followed the vaccines for the proper duration of time and this is very troubling for we thus do not know what the future will hold for recipients. I am no anti-vaxxer, I support vaccines but they must be properly developed. These were not developed properly in terms of research methodology, the duration of follow-up, the lack of proper safety testing, and the resulting estimates are questionable and especially as to how it is presented to the public. Meant to deceive. The public has been lied to. We have no idea how these will behave longer term in children and it can severely harm our children and may even kill them. Children have a natural protection in that they do not have the molecular and biological basis like adults to be infected and to get severely ill. I am warning the FDA that if they approve this, we run the risk of killing thousands of American children (and global children), harming them with myocarditis and other serious conditions they have been spared of thus far by the natural protection. The vaccine and spike protein is entering the circulation and can have devastating consequences to the vasculature in our children, and may cause clots, bleeding/hemorrhaging etc. 

There is no reason for his, no sound reason or justification and the CDC and NIH and NIAID continue to be flat wrong on this! There is no medical reason and I plead with the FDA to stop this. Children are not to protect adults, we do not need immunity from children to close this off. We have early treatment, we must properly double and triple down protect our elderly and high risk and offer treatment early, but we must not disregard the natural immunity already built up in the society. The immunity children already possess. The more recent disaster to children of the dengvaxia vaccine for dengue fever provides caution. Children were seriously harmed from it. 

The estimated IFR is close to zero for children and young adults. PANDA reports that the IFR for those <19 years is 0.003%. Levin reported that the estimated age-specific IFR was 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25. Comparatively, the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) reported the IFR as follows: 0-4 years, mean 0.003%, 5-9 years, mean 0.001%, 10-14 years, mean 0.001%, 15-19 years, mean 0.003%, 20-24 years, mean 0.006%. The most updated data by the American Academy of Pediatrics showed that “Children were 0.00%-0.19% of all COVID-19 deaths, and 10 [US] states reported zero child deaths. In states reporting, 0.00%-0.03% of all child Covid-19 cases resulted in death.

As to a biological and molecular understanding of the risk, I have brought the evidence together below in a hypothesis that children are already immune and vaccinated. In fact, better than vaccinated with these sub-optimal spike-specific injections that confer a very immature library of immune response. We have strong research by Patel and  Bunyavanich (ACE 2 receptor research that showed the limited expression in children), Loske (showing that pre-activated antiviral innate immunity (mucosal compartment) in the upper airways of children),Yang (showing children have memory B cells that can bind to SARS-CoV-2, indicating the potent role of early (prior) childhood exposure to common cold coronaviruses), Weisberg and Farber et al. (showing children T cells are relatively naïve and mostly untrained, and thus a better capacity to respond to novel viruses), and by Galow (showing children do not spread to other children, while it is adults who spread to children). 

This is the biological hypothesis that can largely explain the very exceedingly low risk in children as to COVID, but what about the epidemiological observational type studies? There are so many showing the low risk in children but here are a couple of good examples. A high-quality robust study in the French Alps examined the spread of Covid-19 virus via a cluster of Covid-19. They followed one infected child who visited three different schools and interacted with other children, teachers, and various adults. They reported no instance of secondary transmission despite close interactions. These data have been available to the CDC and other health experts for over a year. Ludvigsson published a seminal paper in the New England Journal of Medicine on Covid-19 among children 1 to 16 years of age and their teachers in Sweden. From the nearly 2 million children that were followed in school in Sweden, it was reported that with no mask mandates, there were zero deaths from COVID and a few instances of transmission and minimal hospitalization. 

Again, children have a natural ACE 2 protection that has seemingly served them well and protected them and we must not bypass it by entering the deltoid and then the blood stream. They have been spared of the deaths so far that have occurred in adults due to the vaccines, and it is because of this natural protection and the molecular reasons I have outlined above. Leave them alone, they need no COVID vaccine, this can potentially kill them. The CDC and NIH and vaccine developers are deceiving the nation and have not done the proper research. This is highly reckless and dangerous. Dr. Anthony Fauci must stop this madness, this lunacy, this relentless pursuit he has to inject all the children. To this day he cannot explain why. It was always illogical, irrational, nonsensical, and without any scientific merit. President Trump must come forward and at least stand his ground on these injections not entering the arms of our children. This vaccine program began under him and he must be seeing the troubling issues that are emerging as to safety. We want President Biden to follow and to also stand against these for our children, given the potential for serious harm to our children. There is just too much risk. Parents must stand up and reject this lunacy by Fauci, Collins, Walensky, and the reckless, specious television medical experts. If these public health leaders think our children are to be vaccinated and that these are safe, then they must remove the liability protection from the table they all enjoy. Liability protection protects them and not our children. Remove it if you think it is safe. ‘No liability for you means you will get no trust by parents’.

In closing, history teaches us to pause and reflect upon our previous miscues and unforced blunders that had significant consequences. It behooves us to remember the increased incidence of narcolepsy in children in Scandinavian countries following the H1N1 influenza ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine used for the 2009 pandemic (Pandemrix influenza vaccination program).  Additionally, the harms caused by the dengue vaccine in children in the Philippines also come to mind that bore a burden on our society of humans. Sanofi Pasteur halted the vaccines in 2017 due to the very dangerous risk of plasma leakage akin to ebola. “It’s a complication called plasma leakage syndrome…he [Halstead] was so worried, he started writing editorials to scientific journals, even warned the Filipino government about the problem…I just say, no, you can’t give a vaccine to somebody – some perfectly normal, healthy person – and now put them at risk for the rest of their lives for plasma leakage syndrome. You can’t do that.” The tainted polio vaccine that sickened and fatally paralyzed children in 1955 in the United States is also worthy of review in this context. The harm that can accrue from a rapid deployment of mass vaccination to the children has not proven to be safe in all the cases. Perhaps this comment is worth noting: “In 1977, for example, a triple vaccination (against diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) from a defective batch left several children blind, deaf and disabled forever. Children are effectively COVID immune and can be considered already fully vaccinated as per biological and molecular explanation above”.

 

[Chief Stipe]

His Bio makes NZ's Experts look like slugs:

Dr. Paul E. Alexander -

• expert and teacher of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology (former Assistant Professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine);
• former COVID Pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO Washington, DC (2020); and former senior advisor to COVID Pandemic policy in Health and Human Services (HHS) Washington, DC, US government;
• worked/appointed in 2008 at WHO as a regional specialist/epidemiologist in Europe’s Regional office Denmark (nations involved in assigned WHO’s project were Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, Poland), worked for the government of Canada as an epidemiologist for 12 years, appointed as the Canadian in-field epidemiologist (2002-2004) as part of an international CIDA funded, Health Canada executed project on TB/HIV co-infection and MDR-TB control (involving India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Afghanistan);
• education: graduate studies at University of Oxford England, University of Toronto Canada, McMaster University Canada, York University Canada;
• completed a short certificate program at Johns Hopkins Baltimore, USA, in bioterrorism (medical and public health aspects following the deployment of a biological weapon (weaponized pathogen such as small pox, plague, botulism, tularemia etc.) on a city such as Baltimore;
• also lectured and informed routinely by Dr. Donald Henderson who headed eradication of small-pox and developed expertise post the certificate program); awarded Governor General Medal of Canada for academics;
• doctoral studies and post doc completed under supervision of Dr. Gordon Guyatt, co-founder with Dr. Dave Sackett of the field of ‘evidence-based medicine (EBM)’; currently independent academic scientist and consultant.

[Freda]

Interesting dinner guest.