Chief Stipe Posted November 24, 2023 Author Share Posted November 24, 2023 2 minutes ago, curious said: What? I doubt any other trainer would not understand what "one clear day" means. One Clear Day (in force from 7 September 2020) The amendments now prohibit anybody from giving a horse anything other than food and water anytime during the day before the day of a race. A substance may only be given to a horse on the day before a race with the written consent of a Stipendiary Steward or an Investigator and only if the horse needed it solely for welfare reasons But even that definition isn't black and white. Why not state that up until 0001 hrs the day before a race that you cannot administer anything. Then of course you need to define what's food and what's a supplement. The rule is anachronistic - a general catch all based on the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nod Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 Somehow my mind goes back to a horse called Kinda Cross and I think of a dear old Lady ........ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted November 24, 2023 Author Share Posted November 24, 2023 2 hours ago, nod said: Somehow my mind goes back to a horse called Kinda Cross and I think of a dear old Lady ........ Is that a riddle or do we have to go back 20 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nod Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 You are surely aware of the biggest scandal to hit racing in decades and the valiant efforts of an elderly shareholder to expose the three people involved. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted November 24, 2023 Author Share Posted November 24, 2023 17 minutes ago, nod said: You are surely aware of the biggest scandal to hit racing in decades and the valiant efforts of an elderly shareholder to expose the three people involved. What's the relevance? Wasn't it 18 years ago? Certainly not the biggest scandal or even a scandal. The "biggest scandal" you obliquely refer to was proven NOT to be a scandal. Any commissions on sales are well written into TA contracts for every syndicate member to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nod Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 Obviously you have been brainwashed -even split three ways $600,000 is more than commission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted November 24, 2023 Author Share Posted November 24, 2023 17 minutes ago, nod said: Obviously you have been brainwashed -even split three ways $600,000 is more than commission. Don you've gone on and on about this subject on various forums for years. Didn't the SFO investigate and find no wrong doing? At $600,000 are you saying the horse was sold for $3m? Obviously you don't have an opinion on the one clear day mistake but any opportunity to slash a few tall poppies and you're in like Flynn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nod Posted November 27, 2023 Share Posted November 27, 2023 I did not say the horse was sold for 3 million --I read on an internet site that it was sold for 1.4 million and the owners told it was 800.000 The one clear day could be better expressed -I would suggest ;not on raceday before racing nor on the preceding day. I am surprised that a trainer and a horse vet do not know the rules yet a stablehand does You get the impression that they started the horse believing they could not be caught out Good work by the investigators 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted November 27, 2023 Author Share Posted November 27, 2023 43 minutes ago, nod said: I did not say the horse was sold for 3 million --I read on an internet site that it was sold for 1.4 million and the owners told it was 800.000 But the SFO investigated and found no fraud. 44 minutes ago, nod said: The one clear day could be better expressed -I would suggest ;not on raceday before racing nor on the preceding day. I agree but why not make it 36 hours before first race. Also presumably under the current rules you could seek RIB approval to give the treatment within a shorter time frame. Has that ever been done? 46 minutes ago, nod said: I am surprised that a trainer and a horse vet do not know the rules yet a stablehand does Wasn't a stablehand. But that said the rule is ambiguous and Singapore's is different. If you read the full judgement you can see some communication issues. 47 minutes ago, nod said: You get the impression that they started the horse believing they could not be caught out Conjecture. No evidence to suggest that. 47 minutes ago, nod said: Good work by the investigators Must have been the 0800 Snitch line. How many other trainers are doing or have done treated horses with non-prohibited substances in the interests of the horses health and the owner and punter pocket? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.