-
Available Subscriptions
RIU
1,715 topics in this forum
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 166 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 180 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 204 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 179 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 176 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 181 views
-
-
- Journalists
14-20 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 202 views
-
- Journalists
14-20 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 209 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 185 views
-
-
- Journalists
7-13 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 204 views
-
- Journalists
7-13 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 180 views
-
- Journalists
7-13 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 167 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 186 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 156 views
-
-
- Journalists
30 June – 6 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 176 views
-
- Journalists
30 June – 6 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 161 views
-
- Journalists
30 June – 6 July 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 197 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 193 views
-
-
- Journalists
24-29 June 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 199 views
-
- Journalists
23-29 June 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 203 views
-
- Journalists
23-29 June 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 190 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 183 views
-
-
- Journalists
16-22 June 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 196 views
-
- Journalists
16-22 June 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 190 views
-
- Journalists
16-22 June 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 181 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Yes, an odd comment from Ellis when synthetics are significantly safer than grass. -
By Wandering Eyes · Posted
It takes more than steel and cement to construct a building. For one as large in scale as the new Belmont Park, it requires a treasure chest of money—somewhere in the ritzy neighborhood of about a half-billion dollars—and a ton of support.View the full article -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
No you said there was only "one grass galloping track there". There are two. You'd "like" that wouldn't you @Freda? So the 2yr olds can develop on one grass galloping track and trial and race on the other? As for saying TA "bring their 2 yr olds up on grass tracks" - it is just an observation based of the fact they consistently avoid galloping or trialling on synthetic tracks with young horses. Ellis referred to that fact in his newsletter which was the lead post in this Topic. -
Equi Ed, Straight Outta the Thoroughbred Chat Page. Have been doing a squiz at the Thoroughbred chat page and saw how Equi Ed sneaked their shonky arrangement into New Zealand. It is not merely a bad appearance; it is a complete stitch-up. They have done a Three-Day Bimbo Course 2024 in fake anatomy, and it is all smoke and mirrors. The Flyer flyer for the Two Day Bimbo Course In Scotland boasts that it is appropriate for vets and vet nurses, and this makes Becks Nairn appear to have some sort of qualification. But the Equi Ed website? No vets. No vet nurses. No oversight. Branding mere fluff and a wink to the gullible. It is a time-tested trick: insert the terms of vet and vet nurses and make it appear to be official, and hope that nobody reads the fine print and collects the money. Be beside actual professionals, sound good, and wish that no one questions. Equi Ed is giving this the gospel treatment-standing Becks up so she can act out being a Bimbo Vet as the cash continues to come in. I dare not say so, but the so-called pretty teacher is like a box-shaped bimbo with legs. It is not merely dodgy, it is regulatory rotty disguised as empowerment. And it is taking place right in our noses. The too-good place in New Zealand is playing host to this anatomy cosplay circus. Time to declare it a cash grab with no qualifications, no investigation and a lot of smoke. What the hell is Education coming to these days? Dodgy Educators with Bimbo Teachers with no qualifications -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You are conflating a two issues. @Brodie has been banging on about funding for a long time before ENTAIN pitched up to buy an insolvent TABNZ. Even then the Government had to bail TABNZ out with taxpayers money. So the revenue issue has been around a long time. ENTAIN has handed the industry a lifeline for 5 years before any revenue cuts occur. I'm not deflecting I'm just making the point, which you refuse to accept, that comparatively ENTAIN transgressions are nowhere near that of WESTPAC or CBA. The former received the largest fine in history! Yet the doomsayers are not looking at the facts of the case but are intent on sucking the lemon and casting doubt on ENTAIN's future. I post a great financial result and it is ignored. The point is ENTAIN are NOT going to be finded 100's of millions of dollars for their alleged transgressions. You can paint a scandulous picture if you want but it has no substance. So? Action was taken. Heads were rolled. Cost cutting has occurred. All prudent senior management decsions. Discuss it all you want but don't overlook facts! A fine man he may well be but you are overlooking his role in the alleged money laundering which YOU say is extremely serious. You can't have it both ways!! 2 bob each way as it were! I never said AUSTRAC wasn't a serious issue however to quantify it as a BIG thing is wrong when you compare it to other actions undertaken by AUSTRAC. Perspective is important!! As for your share price anlysis it was subjective and not accurate. In the last 6 months the share price as risen 46%! Profit takers took a profit in April and obviously have reloaded buying in at a lower price. Some have made an absolute killing! How do you know it has "disappeared"? You made that up or you are privy to ENTAINS corporate accounts.
-
-
Topics
-
