-
Available Subscriptions
RIU
1,720 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
24-30 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 427 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 380 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 288 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 268 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 256 views
-
-
- Journalists
17-23 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 290 views
-
- Journalists
17-23 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 359 views
-
- Journalists
10-16 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 293 views
-
- Journalists
10-16 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 398 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 345 views
-
-
- Journalists
10-16 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 266 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 271 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 389 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 381 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 251 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 270 views
-
-
- Journalists
3-9 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 277 views
-
- Journalists
3-9 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 375 views
-
- Journalists
3-9 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 315 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 276 views
-
-
- Journalists
Racing Taupo @ Taupo, Wednesday 26 February 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 301 views
-
- Journalists
24 February – 2 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 254 views
-
- Journalists
24 February – 2 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 276 views
-
- Journalists
24 February – 2 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 235 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By PeterLambFan · Posted
Darn so we won’t hear about the Broadster dancing in his lounge as a dog hits front as of August. -
what . There wouldn't be a paid job going where an employee could view pornography on work equipment. would be grounds for (summary) instant dismissal as is a case of serious misconduct. (yes the brothels get away with it I spose ) Of course a 'dismissal procedure' must be followed to avoid any 'Unfair Dismissal ' claims by some gold seeking lawyer , just as in other serious misconduct issues under employment Law such as Theft, physical violence, Gross negligence or serious insubordination. they are not worthy of keeping on staff at any business . unfortunately in this day and age the legal system is full of claims of serious Sexual harassment. It seems to come in all shapes and forms these days that lead to all sorts of issues. Staff seeing someone with pictures on a screen of a sexual nature, is not only Very poor taste, terribly poor ethically, but also a type of harassment to those that know it's going on, and would effect productivity and co-operation in the workplace. It is incredibly easy to prove from the hard drive. Dismiss them instantly. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You obvuously have no understamding of employment law. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Wrong on all counts. You are as bad as @curious reading what you want to read as opposed to distilling the facts. You make the assumption he tried to hide it. What if he wasn't asked? In any case what was he hiding? That he watched porn on his office computer? If you are talking about your post then not "clever" more salacious innuendo unbecoming of someone of intellect. Given both you and @curious haven't yet identified the core issue with the case I can say that neither of you would meet your expectations of an RIB Stipe. Now what does that highlight? -
Chief Mickey Mouse?
-
-
Topics
-
