-
Available Subscriptions
The Rest of the World
78,425 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
Luc Belaire Rare Rose Auction to Benefit TAA
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 170 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 174 views
-
-
- Journalists
TAKE2 Adds Awards For Juniors, Amateurs
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 175 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 165 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 174 views
-
-
- Journalists
Skelton, Marino Sentenced in Horse Doping Cases
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 156 views
-
- Journalists
Resilience Possible For Belmont
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 173 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 163 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 167 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 155 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 172 views
-
-
- Journalists
Aga Khan Blueblood Warms the Epsom Faithful
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 169 views
-
- Journalists
Bullet To Pass On Royal Ascot
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 166 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 165 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 181 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 173 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 166 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 165 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 180 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 194 views
-
-
- Journalists
Ezeliya Leads Home Dubawi One Two In The Oaks
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 185 views
-
- Journalists
Four Grade Threes Feature On Foster Preview Day
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 189 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 209 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 230 views
-
Announcements
-
Posts
-
As a form of evidence, a screenshot of a text message is not evidence, it is anecdotal and untested. In the case of scientific claims by her, where do the control samples lie? It is impossible to pronounce something abnormal without defining what normal is using the correct methodology. It is science at its simple level. Her comparisons are mere guesses without peer-reviewed information or veterinary care. -
As I have been informed, the Stable to Stirrup program has been heavily funded when Becks Nairn participated in it. Extraneous staff were hired including young girls who were hired to help her. Nairn started calling herself the head trainer, a title that indicates her tendency to use high-status names. The staffing and funding were not enough yet the staff retention was a problem. A good number of the younger employees did not last long, and they were reporting internal trouble. Hiring more people within a charity is financially liable and according to me, Nairn has not been open about the way these resources were used. Following the departure of Nairn in the charity, a new manager was hired. Purportedly, things had gotten better- personnel retained their positions and business operations were smoother. I am left wondering as to what exactly occurred between Nairn and the Stable to Stirrup program and whether she has left due to underlying reasons that are still unresolved.
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
She often talks about not having enough funding to do supporting analyses such as testing blood samples prior to dissection. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Well she did post a screen shot of the texts. What I have noticed about her claims is there is no verification of the "normal" to which she compares her "abnormal". That is there is no information on her control samples. -
I have seen Becks Nairn boasting a good deal since I read a little about her, about the horses she has dissection-ed--they are not creatures, but merely carcasses. Her endless narration of tales, along with the sale of hypothetical and usually false findings over a paywall, is worrisome. In spite of all these her assertions, there is yet no single piece of veterinary-reviewed or peer-reviewed evidence to substantiate her results. She is aware that should she enter the scientific field, she will be evaluated by experts and be judged according to scores she cannot achieve. She will not be able to conceal herself behind her followers or the edited stories that she can direct. I will repeat it, she realizes that her income would plummet significantly in case she had to tell the truth, to create hard, verifiable evidence.
-
-
Topics
-
