Belle

You tell me. Most posters here on this topic could do with a lesson on the laws of evidence, what is likely to be admissible or inadmissible and the process in regards discovery between defence counsel and prosecutors.

Happy and no doubt the same result for the investigators

Holy ravioli - heard of Mudford and Hain - no problem with those starters in 60s and 70s.

Watch the drive on Full of Hope on Boxing Day. Should questions have been asked of that drive. $3 was easy money today.

Hesi your south auckland geography needs a tidy up. Last time I was there I understood Counties track was once Pukekohe and closer to those Waikato training centres you refer to!

Kakama mongolian machete is the bet of the night. My tip for the derby! Look up trial ashburton 23 jan

Brodie ive worked out your obvious thought process - it goes thus “if I can’t remember then it never happened “ Sums you up really

Brodie u are a simpleton judging from your comments on this thread. You clearly have no idea of police procedures as it relates to a major inquiry such as this. The planing detail, co ordination of warrants for a co ordinated execution on various properties, the obtaining and securing of evidence is way above your ‘pay scale’. i suggest you refrain from commenting on actions you have no clue about. in law to undertake an arrest you need Prima Facie evidence of a crime. The issue of proof will in these instances will be left to 12 people similar to you. in conclusion I do note that you are prone to blowing your trumpet - I have to ask myself does the lift go to the top floor