cyclops

At least those results where available on day of activity……by way of comparison how about this- yesterdays Addington Trial results not listed yesterday but Videos of heats were !!!

Sky dive by messrs Close Cox Orange was masterly ‘feel good’ promotion for Cancer research BUT could well have also been a promotion for Harness industry/participants if , say, TV and mainstream news outlets had ‘run’ the story….does anyone know if HRNZ semaphored this promotion to TV and mainstream news outlets ?

Thanks ‘Rangatira’ for your Thursday comment “fact!!!” which looks as if you have been able access some sort of authorative info - can you supply details as to where such info can be sighted. ?? Also , can you and/or someone else answer/ respond to my other question “is it usual for RIB to impose a penalty before incident is dealt with by Court proceedings “ ?.

Despite the humbug of RIB website (seemingly) requiring viewers to take additional steps to access sites ‘news’ my yesterdays questions remain unanswered - is 900 fine a fact or fiction ? Is it usual for RIB to impose a penalty before incident is dealt with by Court proceedings ?

On RIB site the most recent posting is dated 18Feb….therefore the question is whether the alleged 900 fine is a fact or fiction….? Additionally- is it usual for RIB to impose a penalty before incident is dealt with by Court proceedings ….?

Now that HRNZ are without CEO and also a GM may i repeat question posed within my Jan19 post (Headline was ‘Racing, Marketing etc’) “opportunity for all three Codes to consolidate under the management of a single executive” what better time than the present ?

Friday post was made without any knowledge of todays NZTR declaration of their plan for their future….such a pro-active attitude is to be commended , of course, but begs the question as to why the other Codes have not participated in something similar…..also, how about other Codes engaging NZTR ‘machine’ to manage other Codes affairs ?

Irrespective of reason(s) for HRNZ’s current title holder to move on does it present opportunity for all three Codes to consolidate their activities under the management of a singular Executive. ?

Newspaper item says that it understands (quote) a large part of at least one defendant’s legal bill was fighting to stop the Racing Integrity Board gaining access to the police evidence which may have led to prosecutions under the rules of racing , for which the penalties including lengthy bans can be severe(unquote) Perhaps there exists some fine legal principles (read- dancing on the head of a pin?) but surely if abovementioned “fighting” created legal invoices for defendand/s to meet due to his/her wishing camouflage their position then those invoices are entirely of defendant/s creation

HUEY in an earlier post today identified a link….by following that link there is a message ‘page not found ‘ ….can someone explain what that is all about , please

The ‘grapevine’ has it that on some social media there is an open letter ( penned by a multiple Cup winning ownership ) pointing the bone at HRNZ Board’s activities…..does anyone have copy for posting onto this site?

In the light of (lateish) scratching from Melbourne Cup the question is what causes and/or creates situation leading to the likes of Melbourne Cup scratching …….could similar situation arise in NZ Harness Racing ?

Perhaps I have overlooked the actual structure/ support of Sales but would someone identify for me what HRNZ have done by way of promotion of Sales

Is that- fair ? Unfair? appropriate? Inappropriate? reasonable? Unreasonable?

What penalty did the Trainer have imposed?