Yes, I know. It saddens me greatly.
Track closures have been on the agenda for a while, but now, locally anyway, some of those meetings must shift to the AWT to justify it.
I have been castigated for being negative , living in the past ' like all you Kiwis who won't move forward ' ; but - sentiment aside - shifting from a low-cost model to a high-cost model doesn't seem to be the way to increase revenue. Will punter losses increase as a result? I don't know. But, sure as hell, those that sit in offices don't either.
Inconsistent track surfaces and a wide variety of geographical differences have been cited as one reason for falling turnover. But, to many punters that is part of the challenge of sorting out a value bet. The off course bettors will still have their regular flutter while downing a jug after work...but will they bet more because it is an AW meeting and not at Oamaru or Timaru? And the loss of local interest and a day out at the races is not going to increase either involvement or interest.
As a training aid, yes, a big help certainly to the likes of Cambridge with its very wet winters and springs, and large numbers of horses.
There are a number of innovations that , in other jurisdictions, have been incorporated into training facilities since the days of working around a paddock, or common ground.
Hyperbaric chambers, swimming pools, water walkers/treadmills, uphill gallops, straight gallops....all modern, have their place - and cost. Our industry, at this stage, can't afford any of this, unless a private benefactor was to roll up with the dosh. But, the industry is now so depressed that I don't think any business case could be made for such an investment.
Of course, the AWT's are using taxpayer money, and it is always easier to spend someone else's money than your own.
Cost savings with the closures? the float trip, and vehicle costs for jockey/trainers, yes, fair enough. But those costs aren't industry-subsidised, it is a matter of personal choice whether to go or not. The provision of TAB and broadcasting, ok. But the Chief has clearly demonstrated how much of that is far too expensive for what is necessary.
Over the years, market forces have reduced quite a number of tracks, with mostly positive results for the clubs that made that choice. But, I don't see huge benefits to the wider industry as a result.