Walt Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 9 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: Buyers remorse after 6 days ...A National voter... Sir Ian Taylor: The unintended consequences of the new government | Stuff.co.nz Well done H.R. You found someone who's unhappy because he didn't get all of his election wishes. As you know now, I'm about context and balance so with that in mind, be sure there are many tens of thousands of good kiwi's that are not feeling any buyers remorse whatsoever, in fact they are still celebrating the relief of the divisive & damaging Labour eggplants mercifully being gone. Now our beautiful country can get back on the road to recovery, despite the incessant bleating from losers in the cheap seats Helpful tip. Stop sucking lemons all day. That can't be good for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 58 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: Buyers remorse after 6 days ...A National voter... Sir Ian Taylor: The unintended consequences of the new government | Stuff.co.nz He voted to get rid of the Labour Government - he's hardly a committed National voter having only voted for them 3 times in 55 years!!!! Perhaps Stuff should have written the headline - The Unintended Consequences of MMP? What odd's are you offering that Tova and or Stuff won't last 3 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 5 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: He voted to get rid of the Labour Government - he's hardly a committed National voter having only voted for them 3 times in 55 years!!!! Perhaps Stuff should have written the headline - The Unintended Consequences of MMP? What odd's are you offering that Tova and or Stuff won't last 3 years? Seeing as you are itching and scratching for a bet...I will bet $100 that this coalition Govt in it's existing form does not last more than...3 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 2 hours ago, holy ravioli said: Seeing as you are itching and scratching for a bet...I will bet $100 that this coalition Govt in it's existing form does not last more than...3 years. FFS back pedalling - you said they wouldn't see the term out! WTF does "in it's(sic) form" mean? BTW it's is a contraction for "it is"! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 2 hours ago, holy ravioli said: Seeing as you are itching and scratching for a bet...I will bet $100 that this coalition Govt in it's existing form does not last more than...3 years. Pretty sure you stated you can't see the Government lasting three years which is any amount of time in the first term from one day to three years. Now you've changed that to not lasting longer than three years. Obviously H.R, you're backtracking on your initial statement which reflects a lack of confidence. I'm sure Chief with accept your retraction and apology . It's encouraging that you're now seeing enough positive signs with the new Government to retract your original prediction. If you keep it up you may even stop using the Sausage Roll muncher's term of a "Coalition of chaos" before long and actually vote for National yourself in 2026. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 11 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: FFS back pedalling - you said they wouldn't see the term out! WTF does "in it's(sic) form" mean? BTW it's is a contraction for "it is"! Being a grammar/spelling Nazi is fraught with...danger.🙃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 11 hours ago, Walt said: Pretty sure you stated you can't see the Government lasting three years which is any amount of time in the first term from one day to three years. Now you've changed that to not lasting longer than three years. Obviously H.R, you're backtracking on your initial statement which reflects a lack of confidence. I'm sure Chief with accept your retraction and apology . It's encouraging that you're now seeing enough positive signs with the new Government to retract your original prediction. If you keep it up you may even stop using the Sausage Roll muncher's term of a "Coalition of chaos" before long and actually vote for National yourself in 2026. Nice that I've got a tag team that runs interference for each other! No mention of the Chiefs repetitive 9 years...claim...hell no ,how would that maintain our..double standards! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 43 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: Nice that I've got a tag team that runs interference for each other! No mention of the Chiefs repetitive 9 years...claim...hell no ,how would that maintain our..double standards! Really @holy ravioli seems you have had your daily glass ov vinegar for breakfast with a side of hypocrisy. Was the Pot Kettle black? So I take it you have back tracked on "this Government not lasting the first term"? Or like your horse racing selections would you rather wait until closer to the next election, like one day out to determine what track conditions will be like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 29 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Really @holy ravioli seems you have had your daily glass ov vinegar for breakfast with a side of hypocrisy. Was the Pot Kettle black? So I take it you have back tracked on "this Govenrment not lasting the first term"? Or like your horse racing selections would you rather wait until closer to the next election, like one day out to determine what track conditions will be like? So I take it you have back tracked on "this Govenrment lasting for 9 years? This is how you spell...'government'-didn't take long...did it?😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: So I take it you have back tracked on "this Govenrment lasting for 9 years? I haven't back tracked but then I didn't offer a bet did I. So you now agree that the National led Government will go full term. Good we're making progress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 7 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: This is how you spell...'government'-didn't take long...did it?😄 Did you go to the same school as @Thomass and didn't learn the correct way to use ellipses? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 11 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Did you go to the same school as @Thomass and didn't learn the correct way to use ellipses? There is no correct...way...afaic.😐 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 1 hour ago, holy ravioli said: There is no correct...way...afaic.😐 That's the incorrect way. Your use of it is meaningless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 14 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: I haven't back tracked but then I didn't offer a bet did I. So you now agree that the National led Government will go full term. Good we're making progress. I have only offered one bet regarding this Govts term...so no back tracking...there.🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 Just now, Chief Stipe said: That's the incorrect way. You use of it is meaningless. That's just your opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 27 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: That's the incorrect way. You use of it is meaningless. I presume you mean....your! And of is not spelled 'ov'-you're good at...this.😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 3 hours ago, holy ravioli said: I presume you mean....your! And of is not spelled 'ov'-you're good at...this.😁 You keep pumping out those ellipses. Three dots is the standard not four! We can only imagine what you were intending to write in place of the ellipsis. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 2 hours ago, holy ravioli said: I have only offered one bet regarding this Govts term...so no back tracking...there.🙄 I beg to differ H.R. ...yes, you've only offered one bet but that bet is a clear back track on your original statement that they wouldn't see out the term. Your bet offered however is that they don't win a second term. I can see why your confidence is diminishing. The Government is in the eyes of many, on the right track. Labour however are still barking at the moon with the same players all convincing each other from their echo chamber that their election drubbing was just an anomaly. Haha, good luck with that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 1 hour ago, Walt said: I can see why your confidence is diminishing. The Government is in the eyes of many, on the right track. Labour however are still barking at the moon with the same players all convincing each other from their echo chamber that their election drubbing was just an anomaly. Haha, good luck with that one I agree and as for Winston - well everyone knows Winston. He'll be off on diplomatic missions when he isn't attending race meetings drinking single malt whiskies soon enough. Honestly I didn't think Luxon would step up but I believe he is. The proof for that is the squeals from the media, unions, academics and other Labour patsies on various boards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 2 hours ago, Walt said: I beg to differ H.R. ...yes, you've only offered one bet but that bet is a clear back track on your original statement that they wouldn't see out the term. Your bet offered however is that they don't win a second term. I can see why your confidence is diminishing. The Government is in the eyes of many, on the right track. Labour however are still barking at the moon with the same players all convincing each other from their echo chamber that their election drubbing was just an anomaly. Haha, good luck with that one Vague commentary that serves no useful...purpose.🤪 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said: I agree and as for Winston - well everyone knows Winston. He'll be off on diplomatic missions when he isn't attending race meetings drinking single malt whiskies soon enough. Honestly I didn't think Luxon would step up but I believe he is. The proof for that is the squeals from the media, unions, academics and other Labour patsies on various boards. 'Honestly I didn't think Luxon would step up but I believe he is. The proof for that is the squeals from the media, unions, academics and other Labour patsies on various boards.' No surprise 1 + 1 = 3...in your world.Hopeless.🙃 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 22 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: 'Honestly I didn't think Luxon would step up but I believe he is. The proof for that is the squeals from the media, unions, academics and other Labour patsies on various boards.' No surprise 1 + 1 = 3...in your world.Hopeless.🙃 So why did you need to quote me twice? What's your definition of "hopeless"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 2 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: I agree and as for Winston - well everyone knows Winston. He'll be off on diplomatic missions when he isn't attending race meetings drinking single malt whiskies soon enough. Honestly I didn't think Luxon would step up but I believe he is. The proof for that is the squeals from the media, unions, academics and other Labour patsies on various boards. Me thinks Winnie already back enjoying his single malts ...One thing for sure, he has more personality and spine than many in Wellington. I find myself enjoying Shane Jones more than expected but that could be related to his humour and the way he swats away bleeding hearts like blowflies. The squeals we are hearing to and from the media are nauseating and best treated with the contempt the deserve. I'm not sure how Luxon could have played his hand any better than he has in recent weeks. If he continues to lead as PM in a similar manner things will be fine....despite the protestations. Snowflakes are always going to be.....snowflakes. They often have extreme difficulty working out if they are Arthur or Martha but still refuse to even consider the evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 1 hour ago, holy ravioli said: Vague commentary that serves no useful...purpose.🤪 Your were snapped buying supplies H.R Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 So not even 1 week in the Govt is exposed using their playbook of -lie,deny,-then lie again. Luxon told the nation that Labours smokefree legislation would mean only 1 outlet in Northland could sell tobacco products. His right hand man ,former Philip Morris Tobacco coy lobbyist,doubled down on Q&A this morning. It was pointed out that the real number is 35 outlets...not 1...(35 is 34 more than..1) This information is easily available online. A harbinger of the M.O of this coalition of calumny.Sad.NZ deserves...better.😬 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.