holy ravioli Posted December 8, 2023 Author Share Posted December 8, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 1 hour ago, holy ravioli said: Such polls are worthless. Taken after Newshub incessantly used the word "chaotic" when describing the new coalition Government. Jenna Lynch (ironic name) headed that witch hunt after Winston Peters after he humiliated her for asking more inane questions of him in her rush to gain brownie points with other "alleged journalists" and justify their own existence on quiet news days. Sorry to burst your sad little bubble but the only poll that means anything was the one held on Saturday 14th October and around the same time of the year in 2026. Until then be mindful of it being summer, the time snow flakes melt fastest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted December 8, 2023 Author Share Posted December 8, 2023 22 minutes ago, Walt said: Such polls are worthless. Taken after Newshub incessantly used the word "chaotic" when describing the new coalition Government. Jenna Lynch (ironic name) headed that witch hunt after Winston Peters after he humiliated her for asking more inane questions of him in her rush to gain brownie points with other "alleged journalists" and justify their own existence on quiet news days. Sorry to burst your sad little bubble but the only poll that means anything was the one held on Saturday 14th October and around the same time of the year in 2026. Until then be mindful of it being summer, the time snow flakes melt fastest. Reid research=margin of error +/_ 3.1%....😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 On 9/12/2023 at 10:15 AM, holy ravioli said: What a dumb arse meaningless question to ask. Aside from the fact that most respondents wouldn't know the meaning of the word chaotic the counter factual that a one party majority government provides a more stable Government was well and truly disproven in the past term of the Labour Government. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted December 11, 2023 Share Posted December 11, 2023 5 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: What a dumb arse meaningless question to ask. Aside from the fact that most respondents wouldn't know the meaning of the word chaotic the counter factual that a one party majority government provides a more stable Government was well and truly disproven in the past term of the Labour Government. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 24 Author Share Posted January 24 So the Headhunters have opened a new club site on Aucklands Nth Shore on a $700,000 property. A priority for this new Govt was a crackdown on crime and gangs.Don't tell me its all 'hui and no...doey'!😃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 hours ago, holy ravioli said: So the Headhunters have opened a new club site on Aucklands Nth Shore on a $700,000 property. A priority for this new Govt was a crackdown on crime and gangs.Don't tell me its all 'hui and no...doey'!😃 Do you have Intel that crime is being committed at the new headquarters? I see the cops have been there several times so any assistance you can provide would be great. BTW they bought the property under the last Labour Governments reign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 24 Author Share Posted January 24 'BTW they bought the property under the last Labour Governments reign' Given the new Govts rhetoric how is this relevant. As for committing any crime....isn't that supposedly the 'raison d'etre' of...gangs. Please enlighten...me.🤪 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, holy ravioli said: 'BTW they bought the property under the last Labour Governments reign' Given the new Govts rhetoric how is this relevant. As for committing any crime....isn't that supposedly the 'raison d'etre' of...gangs. Please enlighten...me.🤪 So what action has the new Government failed to take? As always you are long on hyperbole and inference and short on substance. Let's face it @holy ravioli you were barely relevant before and even less so now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 12 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: So what action has the new Government failed to take? As always you are long on hyperbole and inference and short on substance. Let's face it @holy ravioli you were barely relevant before and even less so now. Very good...back to mimic speak...I accuse you of no substance...so ,you accuse me of no substance!🙄 Engaging with you is quite futile as you do not seem capable of robust discussion.Even you must know..this.😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 8 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: Very good...back to mimic speak...I accuse you of no substance...so ,you accuse me of no substance!🙄 Engaging with you is quite futile as you do not seem capable of robust discussion.Even you must know..this.😄 You obviously love exercises in futility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 4 hours ago, holy ravioli said: So the Headhunters have opened a new club site on Aucklands Nth Shore on a $700,000 property. A priority for this new Govt was a crackdown on crime and gangs.Don't tell me its all 'hui and no...doey'!😃 I lived on the Shore for 40 years. There have always been Motorcycle Clubs / Gangs all over the Shore. The Head Hunters especially have made the Browns Bay area their home for the last decade or so. The previous Government were very kind to gangs and that message was received loud and clear by the gangs themselves. When one of their members buys a property, they do so while dressing and appearing just like any other person. There is no visible patch on display and "Gang Member" is not an occupation so doesn't not appear on the ownership / mortgage paperwork. It's only later when patches are seen on the property that it become clearer who the new owner is. We live in a civilized country where we don't take properties off people just because they are a member of a motorcycle club / gang or they are suspected of criminal activity. That situation changes once it is proven criminal offending is occurring and even more so if it is deemed the property has been purchased via the proceeds of illicit activity. That aside, we are still in January. The new Government has a lot on it's plate including an abundance of misinformation and fearmongering regarding the Treaty of Waitangi. The Government in a democracy can't just decide at a Christmas BBQ to create new laws and enforce them while the house is not sitting. You'll be aware of that so I'm unsure what point you're trying to make. I appreciate you despise the new Coalition Government and have been fear mongering ever since your beloved Labour Party were put out with the trash. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 43 minutes ago, Walt said: I lived on the Shore for 40 years. There have always been Motorcycle Clubs / Gangs all over the Shore. The Head Hunters especially have made the Browns Bay area their home for the last decade or so. The previous Government were very kind to gangs and that message was received loud and clear by the gangs themselves. When one of their members buys a property, they do so while dressing and appearing just like any other person. There is no visible patch on display and "Gang Member" is not an occupation so doesn't not appear on the ownership / mortgage paperwork. It's only later when patches are seen on the property that it become clearer who the new owner is. We live in a civilized country where we don't take properties off people just because they are a member of a motorcycle club / gang or they are suspected of criminal activity. That situation changes once it is proven criminal offending is occurring and even more so if it is deemed the property has been purchased via the proceeds of illicit activity. That aside, we are still in January. The new Government has a lot on it's plate including an abundance of misinformation and fearmongering regarding the Treaty of Waitangi. The Government in a democracy can't just decide at a Christmas BBQ to create new laws and enforce them while the house is not sitting. You'll be aware of that so I'm unsure what point you're trying to make. I appreciate you despise the new Coalition Government and have been fear mongering ever since your beloved Labour Party were put out with the trash. As I've told you I am not a Labour supporter. My understanding was that the new Govt had a raft of legislative bills that were to be passed in their first 100 days. Is this not the case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 23 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: As I've told you I am not a Labour supporter. Which you either a Maori Party or a Barmy Shop Lifting Green supporter. Although I do believe the Communist Party has put up the odd candidate from time to time. There has already been quite a few regulatory changes made. Keep up @holy ravioli!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Which you either a Maori Party or a Barmy Shop Lifting Green supporter. Although I do believe the Communist Party has put up the odd candidate from time to time. There has already been quite a few regulatory changes made. Keep up @holy ravioli!! Tell Walt...not me... 'The Government in a democracy can't just decide at a Christmas BBQ to create new laws and enforce them while the house is not sitting.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, holy ravioli said: Tell Walt...not me... You asked the question. Both Walt and I have answered. Are you just plain lazy to look things up or ignorant on how to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 50 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: You asked the question. Both Walt and I have answered. Are you just plain lazy to look things up or ignorant on how to? What question did Walt answer exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walt Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, holy ravioli said: As I've told you I am not a Labour supporter. My understanding was that the new Govt had a raft of legislative bills that were to be passed in their first 100 days. Is this not the case? Yes, the first 100 days will be a busy time for the new Government. Instead of it being a clean up in aisle 1 for them....it's clean up required in aisle's 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,and 24. They will be very busy all the while having to listen to the babble from the rabble ......in the cheap seats. That first 100 days needs to understood. No legislation can be addressed until at least the new coalition was sworn in on the 27th of November. Nothing could be done between election day on the 14th of October and the 27th November. Then the house retired for it's break on the 14th of December. Four of the 17 days to move forward were weekends. Be patient H.R. This Government will get things done a hell of a lot more efficiently than the last lot who were more interested in virtue signaling than actually achieving anything meaningful. How pathetic is Hipkins? He looks like a friendless lost child in a school playground desperate to pick a side and be accepted. As always, his side will be about ethnicity and sexual orientation so he is still clearly stuck in his echo chamber. Once upon a time the Labour Party represented the working man / woman. Had they stuck to that they would still be in Government. They can blame the coalition until the second coming but they only need look at themselves to where things have gone so badly wrong. Farcically, Hipkins is still saying he doesn't know what Labour could have done differently to win the election. You know what they say about a person who doesn't recognize their own mistakes.......dot dot dot. If Labour have any clues between them, they will replace Hipkins very quickly and get back to the values the party was formed on in July 1916. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 hours ago, holy ravioli said: What question did Walt answer exactly? Have you forgotten it already? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said: Have you forgotten it already? Its like having a convo with a...kid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 Interesting observations.-'selective concern'. New Zealand’s Red Sea deployment points to a selective concern over international law | Robert G. Patman | The Guardian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 As for principles,this-'By agreeing to send an NZDF team to the Red Sea without demanding the US end its opposition to a ceasefire in Gaza, the New Zealand government seems to have retreated from an independent foreign policy based on principles and values.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 11 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: As for principles,this-'By agreeing to send an NZDF team to the Red Sea without demanding the US end its opposition to a ceasefire in Gaza, the New Zealand government seems to have retreated from an independent foreign policy based on principles and values.' Once again you obfuscate the debate by coming up with a counterfactual that's totally irrelevant. What's defending the high seas got to do with getting rid of a terrorist murdering bunch of of religious zealots? You are a Green supporter aren't you? Or are you Chloe in drag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy ravioli Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 8 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Once again you obfuscate the debate by coming up with a counterfactual that's totally irrelevant. What's defending the high seas got to do with getting rid of a terrorist murdering bunch of of religious zealots? You are a Green supporter aren't you? Or are you Chloe in drag I did not write that article.The author explains the connection. Maybe you should just go and clean your gumboots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 6 minutes ago, holy ravioli said: I did not write that article.The author explains the connection. So you don't have an original thought? How long did it take you to Google that opinion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.