Brodie Posted May 5 Author Share Posted May 5 39 minutes ago, Rangatira said: They have a greater level of comfort surrounding the result of an NRL game ? That doesnt make sense Ranga! They are Bookies and set the odds according to their analysis. They adjust the odds of the NRL game as the game progresses. To now be reducing the head to head from 15cents before to now 22.5cents is surely just taking the piss off Kiwi Punters? An increase of 50% is appalling. The fact that they also limit certain punters to only win $20 on a head to head is also just BS, and you wonder why Punters are pointing out the victimisation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangatira Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 19 minutes ago, Brodie said: That doesnt make sense Ranga! Perhaps I was overly subtle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newmarket Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 They probably pay more for harness than league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brodie Posted May 6 Author Share Posted May 6 7 minutes ago, Newmarket said: They probably pay more for harness than league Yes it will cost more to run racing than an NRL game without doubt! However, they are wanting to increase racing turnover I have been led to believe, but highly doubt by their antics? How is increasing the TAB/Entains take out from Head to Heads by 50% going to be encouraging punters to wager on Head to Heads when they are taking out so much more than they were? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangatira Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 1 hour ago, Brodie said: However, they are wanting to increase racing turnover I have been led to believe, but highly doubt by their antics? But not at the expense of yield ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brodie Posted May 6 Author Share Posted May 6 31 minutes ago, Rangatira said: But not at the expense of yield ? You need turnover to have yield Ranga! If you continue to put yield before turnover, it is a recipe for disaster! A smaller yield on a higher turnover is far more beneficial than a higher yield on smaller turnover! You need people interested in racing for it to continue and to continue to dissuade punters flows onto existing and future prospects for harness racing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangatira Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 30 minutes ago, Brodie said: A smaller yield on a higher turnover is far more beneficial than a higher yield on smaller turnover! 2.25 for each outcome would help turnover I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.