Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Do your job Whiterod


Guest CrossCodes

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Yankiwi said:

Since the "cramp" didn't require a 21 or more day stand-down, the dog should have been charged with FTP.

But since it's from a favoured kennel & one of a GRNZ board member, the rules have been interrupted differently.

Consider it a fringe benefit from the corrupt capped crusaders.

I agree. Should have been charged with FTP. At the very least should have to undergo a Satisfactory trial. Very disappointing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching this race  several times what stood out  on a positive note was the run of the 8 dog.. Above All out of Joni Hates Jazz But when you look closer it seems the mother of Above All Kara Janx and the mother of Joni Hates Jazz Elie Saab are litter sisters .
Is that close or what , any thoughts on this mating and the performance .? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎10‎/‎05‎/‎2019 at 7:05 PM, Yankiwi said:

Since the "cramp" didn't require a 21 or more day stand-down, the dog should have been charged with FTP.

But since it's from a favoured kennel & one of a GRNZ board member, the rules have been interrupted differently.

Consider it a fringe benefit from the corrupt capped crusaders.

Another fringe benefit looks like it might be all set up for tomorrow.

I'm sure short time Gavin will be all over it...

Same GRNZ board, different member.

Have a look at the #8 in the first race at Palmy tomorrow.

https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13526/121576/field-detail.aspx

 

As far as I'm aware, a dog needs to have a satisfactory qualifying trial under its belt before it can be nominated for a race & drawn to a field... Unless your a GRNZ board member?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mehe said:

That's line breeding happens all the time 

Mehe . That mating is not linebreeding , it is direct inbreeding where you have a nephew over a niece where the nephew and the niece are from two litter sisters .

Actually I think this dogs run home time looked like it my have been under 12 seconds, hard to get a perfect judgement of the tv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Yankiwi said:

Another fringe benefit looks like it might be all set up for tomorrow.

I'm sure short time Gavin will be all over it...

Same GRNZ board, different member.

Have a look at the #8 in the first race at Palmy tomorrow.

https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13526/121576/field-detail.aspx

 

As far as I'm aware, a dog needs to have a satisfactory qualifying trial under its belt before it can be nominated for a race & drawn to a field... Unless your a GRNZ board member?

 

Likely to be an admin error. Four litter mates qualified last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Arsenic said:

Mehe . That mating is not linebreeding , it is direct inbreeding where you have a nephew over a niece where the nephew and the niece are from two litter sisters .

Actually I think this dogs run home time looked like it my have been under 12 seconds, hard to get a perfect judgement of the tv.

Yes sorry it is your right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎7‎/‎05‎/‎2019 at 9:42 PM, Greyhounder said:

Hey Yankiwi. What is your opinion on the 5 and the 1 at race 1 Addington today. Neither looked like they were chasing to me.

 

I guess what Yankiwi thinks has no bearing on reality.

https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13532/stewards-report.aspx

3) BARREL RUNNER (A Bradshaw) has completed 10 clear runs since Failing to Pursue the Lure on 5 October with this endorsement being cancelled as per Rule 55.7.

Now he's got a clear record. Another dog who will never win a race by more than a head, regardless of the winning time....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, typical Friday night at Wanganui...

https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13533/stewards-report.aspx

A favoured kennel has nothing done about this dog in race 5.

Dog #9 from box 3.

MIKACHU (9/3) - in contact and faltered going to the first turn and dropped out to last and stayed back. Referred to the Vet and cleared of injury.

 

Yet in the very next race, a dog from a non-favoured kennel is charged with FTP for this run.

Dog #1.

LITTLE TORNADO (1) - eased going into the first turn when sharing the lead and went back through the field to last. Referred to the Vet and found to have carpus and sartorius pain with a 14 days stand down. However, the bitch was stood down for 28 days for failing to pursue the lure throughout.

 

So the #1 wasn't "in contact" entering the corner in race 6, but the #9 was "in contact" entering the corner in race 5? 

 

Have you no morals GW? Do you think no-one is watching what you are doing? Why hasn't MG actioned this? I've been telling & showing him for years there is corruption & collusions in the CD. Is he in on all this too? Time will answer the last question...

I can't believe that you continue to show the blatant favouritism for your mates that you do.

At least GRNZ has finally starting catching up with you & I'm very pleased that I've been helping them along the way. In fact, I wonder if headquarters will be reading this post before you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Yankiwi said:

So, typical Friday night at Wanganui...

https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13533/stewards-report.aspx

A favoured kennel has nothing done about this dog in race 5.

Dog #9 from box 3.

MIKACHU (9/3) - in contact and faltered going to the first turn and dropped out to last and stayed back. Referred to the Vet and cleared of injury.

 

Yet in the very next race, a dog from a non-favoured kennel is charged with FTP for this run.

Dog #1.

LITTLE TORNADO (1) - eased going into the first turn when sharing the lead and went back through the field to last. Referred to the Vet and found to have carpus and sartorius pain with a 14 days stand down. However, the bitch was stood down for 28 days for failing to pursue the lure throughout.

 

So the #1 wasn't "in contact" entering the corner in race 6, but the #9 was "in contact" entering the corner in race 5? 

 

Have you no morals GW? Do you think no-one is watching what you are doing? Why hasn't MG actioned this? I've been telling & showing him for years there is corruption & collusions in the CD. Is he in on all this too? Time will answer the last question...

I can't believe that you continue to show the blatant favouritism for your mates that you do.

At least GRNZ has finally starting catching up with you & I'm very pleased that I've been helping them along the way. In fact, I wonder if headquarters will be reading this post before you do.

Did you do a submission to the recent Messara report RIU review Yankiwi?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Testy said:

Did you do a submission to the recent Messara report RIU review Yankiwi?

I did not...

I'm not obligated to do anything. Besides, all the evidence they would ever need is pointed out on these forums...

The moment in time that things began to change, aye Gavin?

image.thumb.png.97e6d8d32d9d7d43805f7635788da2d9.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the option was there to put your 2c in. That you didn't just makes your complaints here that much more a waste of time.

Now they have grounds to dismiss them, after all you had the chance to raise them to a committee that isn't the RIU but is judging them.

opportunity lost I would say. rumours on forums from non-de-plumes are meaningless. And you had a lot to offer evidence wise.

hopefully someone singing this particular tune could be bothered writing in. It wasn't specifically on mine but they would have pointed to the similar problem.

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consistency would be nice.

Given little tornado was up in grade( has never won a race quicker than 18.16 at Wanganui), had contact just before the said easing, as it was trying to shift out and the outside runner trying to shift it in and it pulled up with an injury perhaps a Satisfactory trial as opposed to an ftp charge would have been in order. Benefit of the doubt should have been given. Conversely, Mikachu was the right call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not know if Brendon's "warning off" is still in place or not.

What I can help you with is, is point out what GRNZ's definition of "Warning Off" means in their terms.

 

Warn Off means to direct that a particular person shall not be permitted to enter or remain on any part of the ground or premises where a Greyhound Meeting or trial is being held. Warning off and Warned off shall have a corresponding meaning. 

 

So basically, when GRNZ/RIU put the hammer down, they did so as lightly as they possibly could, when they finally felt had to do something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Lad27 said:

They must like him in Auckland ?

Race 12 - 04:08 PM - Gavin Whiterod Appreciation Stakes - C4/5 - 527m

I'd probably call it something like...

Race 12 - 04:08 PM - No Sponsors Would Front Cash For A Race Name, So Thanks For That Gavin Stakes - C4/5 - 527M 

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...