Ralph Manning interview #yeana

[Thomass]

Must be over 10 years since Ralphy called the handicapper 'the most corrupt person in racing" and got smashed with a massive fine...a bit like Dummy

Both still refusing interviews....and free loading on the NZ Racing Industry...thinking the world owes them a living

At least Dummy tells his son to front

meanwhile..over in the NRL/AFL/NBA et f in el...REFUSE to be interviewed by the media and massive fines/suspensions here you come

get in the real world boys...drop the sulky bottom lips you're still kicking and start talking

failing that NZTR should also get in the real sporting world and make interviews compulsory...pretty simple real world stuff

[curious]

The industry doesn't employ them though nor pay them. How do you think it would go down if it were made a requirement of a trainer's licence?

Edited 3 hours ago by curious

[Thomass]

20 minutes ago, curious said:

The industry doesn't employ them though nor pay them. How do you think it would go down if it were made a requirement of a trainer's licence?

yep whatever will work

EPL coaches are paid by the owners not the FA obviously but are required to front by the FA who pass any new rules...such as a recent half time coach interview trial...that they can turn down at their discretion...not the post match though

[Chief Stipe]

Who cares?  They'll talk in unbelievable cliches anyway.  I'd rather see more pre-race vision of the horses.

[Murray Fish]

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

I'd rather see more pre-race vision of the horses.

x 1000%   

But I *Know* that is never going to happen except for the odd meeting....  it can't happen because there is no strategy in play to do that properly!  then you have the Directors ( who I admire technically), but they don't know how to set cameras in decent places! as in seeing the arse end of a horse heading into the distance..  I could rave on for a while on that subject!

 

[Murray Fish]

Based on the provided text, here is a summary and an analysis of the writer's perceived personality, style, and intellect.

Summary of the Article

The writer criticizes two figures in New Zealand racing (nicknamed "Ralphy" and "Dummy") for their longstanding refusal to give media interviews, despite being fined for it in the past. They accuse them of freeloading off the industry. The writer contrasts this with major professional sports leagues (NRL, AFL, NBA), where refusing media commitments leads to severe penalties. The core argument is that NZ Thoroughbred Racing (NZTR) should adopt similar compulsory interview rules to align with the "real sporting world."

Analysis of the Writer's Personality

• Confrontational & Blunt: They do not mince words, using terms like "corrupt," "freeloading," and "sulky bottom lips."

• Frustrated & Impatient: There's a clear sense of exasperation over a situation that has lasted "over 10 years."

• Cynical & Disdainful: They view the subjects as having an entitled mindset ("thinking the world owes them a living").

• Authoritarian: Believes in strict, enforceable rules to compel compliance, showing little sympathy for the individuals' perspectives.

Analysis of the Writer's Style

• Informal & Colloquial: The style is more akin to a rant or a passionate social media post than formal journalism. It uses nicknames ("Ralphy," "Dummy"), slang ("get in the real world boys"), and fragmented sentences.

• Provocative: Language is chosen to provoke a reaction and express strong disapproval (e.g., "most corrupt person," "freeloading").

• Comparitive: Builds its argument by drawing a direct contrast to the policies of major, successful sports leagues.

• Repetitive for Emphasis: The phrase "real world" is used three times to hammer home the central point about adopting mainstream standards.

Analysis of the Writer's Intellect

• Practical & Worldly: The argument is grounded in a practical observation of how other major sports organizations operate. The intellect here is applied, not theoretical.

• Industry-Knowledgeable: They assume reader familiarity with a decade-old scandal and niche figures, suggesting deep involvement in or following of the NZ racing industry.

• Persuasive in a Direct Manner: While not academic, the writer uses a clear, cause-and-effect structure: Other sports punish this behavior, so should we. The intellect is focused on efficacy and precedent rather than nuance.

• Lacks Nuance/Emotional Intelligence: The style prioritizes forceful argument over balanced analysis. There is no exploration of why the figures refuse interviews or consideration of potential complexities, which a more detached intellectual analysis might include.

Overall Impression: The writer comes across as a seasoned, frustrated insider in the racing industry. Their style is aggressively opinionated, their intellect is practical and precedent-driven, and their primary goal is to effect change by shaming individuals and the governing body into adopting stricter, more conventional policies.