Muzza Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said: Really? Since when did you join the convent? Or is it something in that Racecourse Hotel rum? Oh dear. Those voices in your head again. Quote
curious Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 59 minutes ago, Muzza said: Very well put Freda. That's it in a nutshell. I agree. She must have had couple of rums between races 1 Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Freda said: It is the context of the event(s) and the lack of integrity inherent in his behavior and the attempts to both dodge consequences and maintain employment in a situation where integrity is not just a like-to-have, it is imperative. If he can't monitor his own, he has no right to sit in judgement on others. So that equates to him being a "piece of shit"? Strong words. I assume you think you are in a position to judge. Obviously you haven't looked at the timeline. That said it appears you haven't read what I posted. In my opinion the reason I wouldn't have employed him is because he didn't put processes and procedures in place as per the Law Society requirements. But you overlooked that. Now there is an old saying that those without sin shall caste the first stone. Do you think that posting online about your employees discretions is without sin? I don't think what Botherway has done deserves him being called a "piece of shit" online. But obviously you have lower standards than most. Quote
curious Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Now there is an old saying that those without sin shall caste the first stone. Do you think that posting online about your employees discretions is without sin? Where did Freda do that? Assuming you mean indiscretions, not discretions? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.