Thomass Posted August 20, 2018 Share Posted August 20, 2018 Stupid question I know...but some Half witted posters on here still ask the question Could it be a blinker Trifecta this year? Redzel, Trapeze Artist, Vega Magic... Just get on https://www.punters.com.au/news/redzel-impresses-in-blinkers_171595/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 The Everest has created a lot of media interest that Victoria are now thinking of staging their own version of the Everest in the Autumn but over 1600 mtrs Back to the Sydney version Redzel who trialled brilliant takes on Invincible Star who also smashed them in a trial on Saturday in the concord a must watch Amazingly Nature Strip hasn’t been snapped up yet But what is even more amazing The Everest is not a Group one race Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 9 hours ago, Ghost said: But what is even more amazing The Everest is not a Group one race Possibly because it is a sweepstake? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted September 2, 2018 Author Share Posted September 2, 2018 Redzel improves lengths with Blinkers by the looks...oustanding in fact Absolutely gave it to the other pretenders Vega raced without Blinkers on Saturday and looks like he needs them now.. Its going to be massive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted September 11, 2018 Author Share Posted September 11, 2018 Nature Strip looks a pure 1000M performer 1200 in the Everest...with pressure on is going to be a step too far isnt it Especially with Vega Magic back in action...with Blinkers On 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 On 3/09/2018 at 10:05 AM, Thomass said: Redzel improves lengths with Blinkers by the looks...oustanding in fact Absolutely gave it to the other pretenders Amazingly stupid comment. Redzel has only ever raced without blinkers once, 2 and a half years ago. Ran 2nd, the start before running 2nd with blinkers back on. On 12/09/2018 at 11:05 AM, Thomass said: Especially with Vega Magic back in action...with Blinkers On How did he go? Did the trick work? Has the horse ever performed so bad? Do blinkers on make them race worse than ever before? You'll blame the track conditions. But doesn't Hayes know what he would be like on a track like that. He wouldn't have started if he knew he was no good. And has won twice in Soft ground. Remember - you just trust the trainer and add 20%. I know you love my price images. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryb Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 Almost post of the year Mardi, Cant wait for Monday Morning when T has finished patching the princess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted October 13, 2018 Author Share Posted October 13, 2018 3 hours ago, mardigras said: Amazingly stupid comment. Redzel has only ever raced without blinkers once, 2 and a half years ago. Ran 2nd, the start before running 2nd with blinkers back on. How did he go? Did the trick work? Has the horse ever performed so bad? Do blinkers on make them race worse than ever before? You'll blame the track conditions. But doesn't Hayes know what he would be like on a track like that. He wouldn't have started if he knew he was no good. And has won twice in Soft ground. Remember - you just trust the trainer and add 20%. I know you love my price images. Seriously, you make Forest Gump look like Einstein... WTF do you think it's had Blinkers on.. nearly forever... ..except Trials...where it goes like a busted ass?? No wonder Dabernig got you to pick up his horses shit...that's all you know If you know him, which I seriously doubt, ring him and ask how Vega handled the really heavy stuff... ...a H 10...not a Soft 6... Its like night and day... Ffs...as for your crazy BOT prices...simulated 1500 f in times...stick them Your numbskull Bot couldn't read Redzel had become cast in his box and needed the race last start... Whats half witted though...and you do it so well...you always take 3 horses at the same Stake...If in the top 3 prices... I don't... You would have invested the same stake on R as you would have on TA...even though the value component according to your Bot..was far superior You do clueless...in every aspect.. so well.. keep it up Gump...it's Academy Award winning laughable stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 7 minutes ago, Thomass said: WTF do you think it's had Blinkers on.. nearly forever... To change its behaviour? 8 minutes ago, Thomass said: If you know him, which I seriously doubt, ring him and ask how Vega handled the really heavy stuff... ...a H 10...not a Soft 6... Its like night and day... Are you saying he allowed his horse to run knowing it couldn't handle the conditions - at $600k a pop? 9 minutes ago, Thomass said: Your numbskull Bot couldn't read Redzel had become cast in his box and needed the race last start... My numbskull bot which I don't have, but my analysis seemed to not need to know what happened to Redzel since I priced it well clear of the rest - in this race! 10 minutes ago, Thomass said: Whats half witted though...and you do it so well...you always take 3 horses at the same Stake...If in the top 3 prices... I don't... You would have invested the same stake on R as you would have on TA...even though the value component according to your Bot..was far superior Wrong again. I certainly don't do that. And I've never written that I would. You just make crap up as always. Face it, you're so far out of your depth. Blinkers on is for morons. You can't generalise like that. Yet all of your blue print bull is based on generalisations. Idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 16 minutes ago, Thomass said: ...a H 10...not a Soft 6... Its like night and day... You can't even get that right. it was a H9. And they ran 1.12 - and on a track where Pierata ran 1.10.8 the race before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 11 minutes ago, mardigras said: You can't even get that right. it was a H9. And they ran 1.12 - and on a track where Pierata ran 1.10.8 the race before. Yeah it was hardly the same as a Trentham H10. The Ozzy Heavy doesn't relate to the NZ measurement at all. Never been able to work out an accurate correlation. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 3 hours ago, mardigras said: To change its behaviour? Are you saying he allowed his horse to run knowing it couldn't handle the conditions - at $600k a pop? My numbskull bot which I don't have, but my analysis seemed to not need to know what happened to Redzel since I priced it well clear of the rest - in this race! Wrong again. I certainly don't do that. And I've never written that I would. You just make crap up as always. Face it, you're so far out of your depth. Blinkers on is for morons. You can't generalise like that. Yet all of your blue print bull is based on generalisations. Idiot. It's quite sad that someone who professes to have been in this industry for so long...even writing a paragraph in a book... ...could be so f in bereft of even the most basic understanding of said Industry A Soft 6 states "moist but not badly affected" A H9 "wet...getting squelchy" The rider who obviously knows far f in less than you... Vega Magic – began awkwardly. Rider D Oliver reported that his mount failed to handle today's heavy track conditions And too rub your total lack of knowledge into your grubby soiled y front The rider of Shoals Shoals – rider T Clark stated that, whilst the mare has form on soft track conditions, it did not handle today's Heavy (9). Gee don't tell me...even though horses have th ability to handle Soft 6's...some can't handle H10's?? f me...WTF knew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Pierata's best from was on a good track. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Thomass said: Gee don't tell me...even though horses have th ability to handle Soft 6's...some can't handle H10's?? f me...WTF knew? Are you telling me Hayes didn't know? I thought he knew everything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 30 minutes ago, mardigras said: Are you telling me Hayes didn't know? I thought he knew everything. How would he know before the horse tried? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: How would he know before the horse tried? Do you mean the heavy track? I guess the same way Thomass states he would know blinkers would help before the horse tried. My comment was tongue in cheek. Edited October 14, 2018 by mardigras 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 3 hours ago, mardigras said: Are you telling me Hayes didn't know? I thought he knew everything. I'm betting the left he'd know you're a dickhead...and that if he ever found out his training partner let you anywhere near his neddys... ...he'd have an infarction... Remarkably some horses like Redzel can handle any ground.... ...and others can handle Moist...but not squelchy wtf knew horses were like that eh?? ..and they're not f in Robots f me 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Exactly. Yet your posts on things like 'blinkers on', '3kg claimers', 'down in grade' are all robotic. Thanks. I'm sure Hayes knew I was with Tom. Given Hayes knows who I am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 Oh that close... Is Tom an ex and does Hayesy know your dissing his use of Blinkers in G1's where he said " we've successfully used Blinkers in this way before" Don't you think you have a responsibility to 'Tom' to divulge the 'stats' from the Stable.... ...that show Hayesy hasn't got a f in clue just how wrong he is... ...and he's making a pillocky pillick out of himself claiming such? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 He's not. It's you doing that to yourself. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 Ok, so the first two home had BLINKERS..and wrt.. ...Curious's and yours... "prove BO makes neddys go faster...but you can't" Do you think if REDZEL had the Blinkers off..he'd have gone slower? Replys on a postage stamp...addressed to DICKHEADS ARE US TWO c/o COMMITTED OCCUPANTS WAITING FOR A CHANGE OF COP THE F ON MEDS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Do you ever give up being so obsessed? It makes no difference. Since it isn't about whether blinkers make a horse run faster. It's about whether the 'addition' of blinkers makes a horse run faster. If a horse runs fastest with blinkers, then one would expect the trainer to present the horse in the manner that gives the horse the best chance of winning. That was what you were asked to prove. Since it was the addition of blinkers that you claimed as your blue print. And the results don't support you. Who knew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 (edited) As for Redzel, my opinion doesn't really matter. But it would be that there would be no discernable difference. It is something that can't be proven one way or the other. Sufficient information doesn't exist to allow a comparison. Edited October 14, 2018 by mardigras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 Oh dear... Every trial without BLINKERS and it goes like a pillock who takes English as a 2nd language... CLUELESS... Email the Snowy boys and tell them they're wasting wear and tear on the Blinkers material.. ...they'll def. have tears running down their cheekers Good God man....when are the Mannys in white Coats bringing out the Cop the F on Meds?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 The one race without blinkers ran 2nd. Comparable performance to starts with blinkers at same stage. I don't care what Snowden says. He may well be right. We will never know. But I deal in facts, not conjecture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.