Not Fair

[nod]

Allowing new entrants for the Eulogy seems unfair. The field should remain as it was. Most of the entrants last week faced a 12 hour float trip.

From what I recall delayed runnings of other races have not allowed new runners

[KickintheKods]

Totally agree NOD.

The only reason I can see is too try and increase the field size to gain increased turnover. and that is in no way guaranteed.

It's another example of the circus in action and totally not fair on those owners and trainers, and horses, who were prepared to travel last weekend.

[Special Agent]

And totally unfair to move the race out of the CD.

[nomates]

1 hour ago, nod said:

Allowing new entrants for the Eulogy seems unfair. The field should remain as it was. Most of the entrants last week faced a 12 hour float trip.

From what I recall delayed runnings of other races have not allowed new runners

Last weeks entrants do get first dibs , if the CD horses don't travel then could end up a field of 7/8 then people complain is it good management of stakes .

Would have been better if a certain club had got their shit together and this situation would never have arisen .

This is all on one set of shoulders .

5 minutes ago, Special Agent said:

And totally unfair to move the race out of the CD.

I agree but put it on at Trentham and might be a field of only 5/6 .

[Doomed]

2 hours ago, nod said:

Allowing new entrants for the Eulogy seems unfair. The field should remain as it was. Most of the entrants last week faced a 12 hour float trip.

From what I recall delayed runnings of other races have not allowed new runners

When those Trentham group races went north noms were reopened, same with the HB features that went north.