-
Available Subscriptions
RIU
1,720 topics in this forum
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 366 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 355 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 654 views
-
-
- Journalists
21-27 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 452 views
-
- Journalists
21-27 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 449 views
-
- Journalists
21-27 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 389 views
-
- Journalists
14-20 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 462 views
-
- Journalists
14-20 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 412 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 574 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 567 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 555 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 525 views
-
-
- Journalists
7-13 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 444 views
-
- Journalists
7-13 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 458 views
-
- Journalists
7-13 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 397 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 377 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 441 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 650 views
-
-
- Journalists
31 March – 6 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 391 views
-
- Journalists
31 March – 6 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 415 views
-
- Journalists
31 March – 6 April 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 526 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 385 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 456 views
-
-
- Journalists
24-30 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 368 views
-
- Journalists
24-30 March 2025
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 397 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By PeterLambFan · Posted
Darn so we won’t hear about the Broadster dancing in his lounge as a dog hits front as of August. -
what . There wouldn't be a paid job going where an employee could view pornography on work equipment. would be grounds for (summary) instant dismissal as is a case of serious misconduct. (yes the brothels get away with it I spose ) Of course a 'dismissal procedure' must be followed to avoid any 'Unfair Dismissal ' claims by some gold seeking lawyer , just as in other serious misconduct issues under employment Law such as Theft, physical violence, Gross negligence or serious insubordination. they are not worthy of keeping on staff at any business . unfortunately in this day and age the legal system is full of claims of serious Sexual harassment. It seems to come in all shapes and forms these days that lead to all sorts of issues. Staff seeing someone with pictures on a screen of a sexual nature, is not only Very poor taste, terribly poor ethically, but also a type of harassment to those that know it's going on, and would effect productivity and co-operation in the workplace. It is incredibly easy to prove from the hard drive. Dismiss them instantly. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You obvuously have no understamding of employment law. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Wrong on all counts. You are as bad as @curious reading what you want to read as opposed to distilling the facts. You make the assumption he tried to hide it. What if he wasn't asked? In any case what was he hiding? That he watched porn on his office computer? If you are talking about your post then not "clever" more salacious innuendo unbecoming of someone of intellect. Given both you and @curious haven't yet identified the core issue with the case I can say that neither of you would meet your expectations of an RIB Stipe. Now what does that highlight? -
Chief Mickey Mouse?
-
-
Topics
-
