-
Available Subscriptions
BOAY Racing News
39,683 topics in this forum
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 416 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 279 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 316 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 313 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
-
- Journalists
Savaglee springs Slipper surprise
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 253 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 300 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
-
- Journalists
La Crique claims Group 1 WFA Classic
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 309 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 234 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 236 views
-
-
- Journalists
Saint Alice prevails in Kaimai Stakes
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
- Journalists
Savaglee scores in Matamata Slipper
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 232 views
-
- Journalists
Dunkel carries topweight to strong Caulfield win
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 233 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 323 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 287 views
-
-
- Journalists
Immediacy takes out Autumn Classic in fine style
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 243 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 314 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 306 views
-
-
- Journalists
Wilsons Prom eyes St Patrick’s Day Cup at Darwin
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 279 views
-
- Journalists
Tough mark for Jimmy James Maguire
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 231 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Murray Fish · Posted
excuses! na. you mention workplace, racing riding and the lifestyle that goes with it if very challenging! yip, dumb is dumb, but! move on.... -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Another erudite wlll thought out post from @Huey - NOT! As always your bias clouds you ability to see the point let alone debate it. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You have enough air time as it is @Thomass -
so this is social media site. The current topic reflects what you typically see on this forum and its got a lot of comment from regular contributors. and there you are generalising how you would sum up people who post on here,or say the other channel. so your either going to say,yes they are as described or no you weren't meaning the current ones posting.Of course if you weren't meaning the current ones posting then you undermine your own comments on what you describe as the typical poster. Also tell me,if many are anonymous like you say,how do you know so much about their personalities,motives and how they feel after posting and how they see the world. is the reality not,there will be people as you have described but your generlisation is just that. In other words your taling a smaller % of posters and placing greater emphasis that they are representative of all posters and people who comment on social media.Doesn't that reflect on how you see the world as well. so you post a put down generalisation of social media posters ,while knocking people who post put down generalisations on social media..Whats the point in that -
No I agree, but they undertook a survey & clearly didn't like the results so we haven't seen anything yet. So why do it ? It shows how delusional they are to expect a positive result to their survey that should tell you all you need to know about them.
-
-
Topics
-
