-
Available Subscriptions
BOAY Racing News
39,683 topics in this forum
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 238 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 228 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 257 views
-
-
- Journalists
Whale Watch – Ashburton
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 208 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 363 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 325 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
-
- Journalists
Legato clash looming for Ladies Man
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 270 views
-
- Journalists
Possible Derby tilt for Solidify
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 244 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 237 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 259 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 271 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 228 views
-
-
- Journalists
Derby a possibility for Solidify
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 236 views
-
- Journalists
Colgan looking to strike at Otaki
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- Journalists
Legarto clash looms on Ladies Man’s horizon
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 276 views
-
- Journalists
Te Akau aiming to capture local juvenile spoils
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 225 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 277 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 323 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 348 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 308 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 236 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 285 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 342 views
-
-
- Journalists
Te Akau aiming to take out local juvenile spoils
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 234 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Murray Fish · Posted
excuses! na. you mention workplace, racing riding and the lifestyle that goes with it if very challenging! yip, dumb is dumb, but! move on.... -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Another erudite wlll thought out post from @Huey - NOT! As always your bias clouds you ability to see the point let alone debate it. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You have enough air time as it is @Thomass -
so this is social media site. The current topic reflects what you typically see on this forum and its got a lot of comment from regular contributors. and there you are generalising how you would sum up people who post on here,or say the other channel. so your either going to say,yes they are as described or no you weren't meaning the current ones posting.Of course if you weren't meaning the current ones posting then you undermine your own comments on what you describe as the typical poster. Also tell me,if many are anonymous like you say,how do you know so much about their personalities,motives and how they feel after posting and how they see the world. is the reality not,there will be people as you have described but your generlisation is just that. In other words your taling a smaller % of posters and placing greater emphasis that they are representative of all posters and people who comment on social media.Doesn't that reflect on how you see the world as well. so you post a put down generalisation of social media posters ,while knocking people who post put down generalisations on social media..Whats the point in that -
No I agree, but they undertook a survey & clearly didn't like the results so we haven't seen anything yet. So why do it ? It shows how delusional they are to expect a positive result to their survey that should tell you all you need to know about them.
-
-
Topics
-
