Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

BOAY Racing News


35,956 topics in this forum

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 84 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 81 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 77 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 84 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 85 views
    • Journalists

    Vale Terry Burns

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 79 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 80 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 124 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 84 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 89 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 104 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 85 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 79 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 80 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 76 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 65 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 80 views
    • Journalists

    Addington Weekly : Nov 18

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 76 views
    • Journalists

    Nathan Purdon has quartet primed

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 80 views
    • Journalists

    Teaz enjoying change of scenery

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 68 views
    • Journalists

    Mowbray’s mares head to Winton

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 68 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 61 views
    • Journalists

    Selections | Winton – Tonight

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 114 views
    • Journalists

    Selections | Manawatu – Thursday

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 93 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 74 views


  • Posts

    • R Todd said in his pre race interview on trackside on the night mouaga would be driven conservatively and would be hoping for luck, so punters were advsied of the tactics.His price reflected those comments. Of course mounga has been a horse we've discussed before on bit of a yarn R todd was previously criticsed for not publicly advising punters at westport of the change in tactics,when a hot favorite. On that occassion the mounga team took punters for a ride when seemingly just there for a quiet run and ended up looking a certainty beaten when a hot favorite.had they advised punters pre race at westport then they would not have received criticism. so,if we are being fair to todd and ferguson as far as mounga goes at auckland,r todd was trying to do the best thing by puinters  as regards mounga,so shouldn't be criticised. Still, not a drive by c ferguson that helped his horses chances even under the circumstances. I'm guessing you didn't hear r todds pre race comments around both horses. They are part of why c ferguson is getting criticsed for the marketplace drive and not mounga and those comments are a significant part of the basis for punters trusting those comments and making marketplace,the winner of its last 6 ,including 2 group 1's,the hot favorite and mounga paying about $8.
    • With 50 Oaks points on the line in Virginia Oaks at Colonial Downs, Fondly (Upstart–Lifetime Memory, by Istan) showed grit in the final jumps as she secured the haul for Eclipse Thoroughbred Partners. A winner on debut at Tampa back in mid-February, the 3-year-old filly led in the initial stages, but was soon joined by Anonima (Sharp Azteca). Fondly slugged it out with her rival and the pair took their battle inside the final furlong marker. However, it was the Graham Motion trainee who surged ahead before the wire. Early On (Union Rags) was up for second. The final running time was 1:42.51. Lifetime Record: 2-2-0-0. Sales History: $50,000 '23 FTKOCT. O-Eclipse Thoroughbred Partners; B-Brereton C Jones (KY); T-H. Graham Motion. The post Fondly Signs Off On Points For Kentucky Oaks At Colonial Downs appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions. View the full article
    • After running a lengthy March 2 opinion piece by Noah Shachtman that questioned why so much money from slot machines, casinos and other subsidies was being to paid to what Shachtman describes as a dying industry in horse racing, the New York Times let its readers have their say. Saturday's edition included five letters to the editor, all from people reacting to a piece entitled “Dead Athletes. Empty Stands. Why Are We Paying Billions to Keep This Sport Alive?” Five letters were published, including one from NTRA CEO Tom Rooney and another from PETA Vice President Kathy Guillermo. Rooney focused in on the positive economic impact the sport produces for not just racing but for many industries. “Mr. Shachtman's essay about horse racing gave short shrift to the sport's upside,” Rooney wrote, “including its positive economic impact. Thoroughbred racing in the United States, according to 2023 data collected by the American Horse Council, has an annual economic impact of $37 billion. It supports 491,000 jobs, thousands of farms and related businesses. Protecting those jobs and reinvesting in racing is no different than measures that states take to support other sports and businesses that are important to local economies and cultures.” He continues: (Shachtman's) essay also discounted racing's safety record and its popularity. The sport has never been safer, with 2024 producing the lowest rate of fatal injury since the data have been kept. And, while the sport may not have the standing it did in the days of Seabiscuit, when the gates open for the 2025 Kentucky Derby, that event will attract 150,000 attendees and more television viewers than any single game of the World Series, the N.B.A. finals or the Stanley Cup.” Guillermo thinks the answer is to replace live racing with Historical Horse Racing Machines, completely overlooking the fact that would destroy the industry and, in particular, the breeding industry. “The racing industry also cons itself into thinking that its biggest issue is its public image, when it actually has a reality problem,” she wrote. “Hundreds of its involuntary athletes suffer gruesome, catastrophic injuries on the track every year, and you can't spin that away. “There is a solution. Historical horse racing machines–glorified slot machines that allow gamblers to bet on videos from past races from which all identifying information (date, location, names of horses and jockeys) has been removed–generate billions of dollars annually in Kentucky. “These machines circumvent the enormous expenses that make live horse racing one of the worst business models. They are not only profitable, but racing without live horses also solves the dead horse problem. Even PETA would support this.” Nicole St. Clair Knobloch of Arlington, Ma, fell into the pro-racing camp. “Horse racing is a multilevel socioeconomic enterprise that provides jobs at all levels,” she writes. “Shutting down the sport would mean that those jobs, and the livelihood and meaning derived from them, would never be replaced. Racing-related businesses run from conglomerates to individual trainers, grooms and jockeys, who are perpetual free agents, looking for the next great ride.” She continued: “It's critical that improvements to the animals' welfare are happening; there are many industries where worker treatment needs improvement. But those improvements are made possible by more public opportunity to enjoy the sport, as there surely will be with the rehabbing of storied tracks like Belmont and Pimlico, providing beauty, nature, animals and afternoon fun right on Long Island and in Baltimore.” Alex Hanson of Geneva, New York, also took exception to the New York Time story. “Noah Shachtman's essay portrays horse racing as a sport that is corrupt and dependent on government subsidies to survive while exploiting the animals and workers within it,” he wrote. “But it doesn't paint the whole picture. My father has bred standardbred horses for more than 40 years. His love and care for the animals is profound, and his work has taught me so much about building relationships with people across a range of experiences and identities. I did not recognize my father or the people I have encountered in the harness horse industry in Mr. Shachtman's piece. The good aspects of this sport and the good people involved in it deserve to be seen.” Judith Mazzucco, from Clarksburg, New Jersey focused on the slaughter issue. “While Noah Shachtman refers to the vast amounts of money involved in the racing industry, the racehorse owners, the investors, the excellent care the racehorses are given, he never addresses the horror that awaits many of these horses at the end of their racing careers,” she wrote. “Racehorses are retired once they have outlived their usefulness as sources of income for their owners. There are some responsible owners who retire their horses to green pastures. Racehorse retirement organizations strive to save many by finding them adoptive homes. Unfortunately, the fate of thousands of these racehorses each year is to be shipped to slaughterhouses in Mexico and Canada. That is the true money trail.” The post Readers Respond to Negative Racing Coverage in the New York Times appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions. View the full article
    • Well, I missed it too 
    • Mentioned in his address was ' reducing costs to owners.....' and attracting young trainers. What a refreshing attitude.  Very different from reducing training options on already dated and poorly-maintained facilities and hitting the poor owner in the pocket all the way.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...