Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

The Rest of the World


79,315 topics in this forum

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 159 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 112 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 96 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 108 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 109 views
    • Journalists

    Derby Diary: It’s a Wrap

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 95 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 99 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 108 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 91 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 119 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 124 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 136 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 110 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 101 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 153 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 3.6k views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 105 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 108 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 108 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 136 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 112 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 106 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 98 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 97 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 123 views

Announcements



  • Posts

    • The prospect of testing conditions for Saturday's William Hill Futurity Trophy Stakes at Doncaster could scupper plans for two of the four entries not trained by Aidan O'Brien, including the Andrew Balding trainee Item, who is set to bypass the final Group 1 of the British Flat season if the ground is heavy. The son of Frankel is unbeaten in two starts to date, having followed up his debut victory at Kempton with a dominant performance at Bath last time, drawing right away in the final furlong to win by three and a half lengths. All roads now lead to Doncaster as the Juddmonte team seeks its fifth win in the Futurity Trophy – and first since American Post struck for Criquette Head-Maarek back in 2003 – but Barry Mahon, Juddmonte's European racing manager, revealed that the possibility of heavy downpours on Town Moor could force connections into a rethink. “Our intention is to go and we're going to declare tomorrow [Thursday],” Mahon told Sky Sports Racing. “Thursday is going to be the make or break day. There's anywhere between 10-30mm of rain forecast so, if the ground was to be heavy, I don't think we would run. If it's soft or good to soft, we'll most definitely run. “Andrew has been very happy with him and he worked well this morning. He's obviously lacking a bit of experience, hence why we went to Bath – we were very keen to get him on grass. He's a horse that only went into training in July, so he's relatively unexposed. Andrew has felt that, every time he's run, his work has improved after it. Again, this morning he was very positive so, fingers crossed, we're all set for Saturday.” The ground at Doncaster on Wednesday was described as heavy, soft in places. Should Item not take his chance on Saturday, Mahon confirmed that the son of GI Natalma Stakes winner Capla Temptress (Lope De Vega) will not run again this season. He added of future plans, “I think he's definitely going to get 10 furlongs and, just speaking to Andrew this morning, we felt there was a good chance he could even get 12 furlongs. Hopefully, he's a horse that could start off in a Derby trial next season and build his way up from there. If the ground came up heavy [at Doncaster], we wouldn't run and he'd be finished for the year.” Similar comments apply to the John and Thady Gosden-trained Oxagon (Frankel), who ran well on his previous visit to Doncaster when filling the runner-up spot in the G2 Champagne Stakes, won by the subsequent G1 Prix Jean-Luc Lagardere hero Puerto Rico (Wootton Bassett). Prince Faisal's homebred again performed with credit when last seen finishing fifth in the G1 Dewhurst Stakes at Newmarket, passing the post three and a half lengths behind Champagne also-ran Gewan (Night Of Thunder), but it remains to be seen whether conditions at Doncaster will allow him to make a quick return to action. “We're all on weather watch,” said Prince Faisal's racing manager, Ted Voute. “There are nine in of Aidan O'Brien's, and 13 in all, and I've been in communication with Peter [Shoemark, racing secretary] at John Gosden's. They're watching the weather. “I'm currently driving to Deauville for a runner that we've got and the weather's fine, but it's meant to hit tomorrow and come up through the country into England, so I would think it depends on that. But it will be quite soft anyhow. “It's up to John and his view of the weather. When we were in the Dewhurst, everybody felt that an extra furlong and a little more juice in the ground would do quite nicely. But whether this much juice is what is required, we'll leave that to John.” The betting for the Futurity Trophy is headed by O'Brien's G2 Beresford Stakes winner Hawk Mountain (Wootton Bassett) at a general 5/4, with stablemate Benvenuto Cellini (Frankel) next best at 3/1. Oxagon is available to back at 4/1, ahead of Item at 9/2. The post Futurity Trophy Starts in Doubt for Item and Oxagon Due to Wet Forecast appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions. View the full article
    • A traceability survey has been launched by The Jockey Club. The survey records the status of a Thoroughbred, including the horse's use and location, so that the industry can better understand the whereabouts of Thoroughbreds that have retired from breeding and racing. The Jockey Club Traceability Initiative helps track Thoroughbreds after their breeding and racing careers, estimate the current population, and improve traceability. Analysis of information submitted through the initiative will enable The Jockey Club to more effectively direct information and resources regarding a horse's transition from racehorse to second career. The Jockey Club requests all Thoroughbred owners complete the survey, which should take only a few minutes per horse, by June 30, 2026, but the survey will remain open so owners can update their horse's future status. In July, The Jockey Club will assess the survey responses, and an analysis of the responses will be provided at the 2026 Round Table Conference. An Interactive Registration (IR) account, which is free at www.registry.jockeyclub.com, is required to complete the survey. Once logged on to IR, click Traceability Survey. “With the traceability survey, we hope everyone who owns, leases, or boards a retired or unraced Thoroughbred will voluntarily report the horse's status to help us improve traceability,” said Kristin Werner, deputy general counsel and director of Industry Initiatives, The Jockey Club. “Understanding where Thoroughbreds go after their racing and breeding careers will advance the entire industry's aftercare efforts and support welfare, accountability, and public trust in the sport.” For horses with no survey response, The Jockey Club Registry will follow up with emails to the last known connections of horses born in 2017 and prior with paper certificates of foal registration that do not have a Thoroughbred Incentive Program number or Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance activity and have not been reported as exported, deceased, or breeding stock. Connections of horses with a digital certificate will also receive follow-up notices from the Registry. Resources for horse owners looking to find new careers for their Thoroughbreds can be found on The Jockey Club's website, click here. Owners wishing to retire their horse from racing should use the Transferred as Retired from Racing process, which will permanently retire the horse.     The post The Jockey Club Launches Traceability Survey appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions. View the full article
    • This Saturday at Santa Anita could prove something of a watershed moment in North American horse racing-the carding of two handicaps built upon a new national ratings system. One race, a $35,000 handicap over 6 furlongs for dirt horses rated between 70 and 79, has drawn seven entries. The next race on the card, a $65,000 handicap over 6 1/2 furlongs on the hillside turf course for fillies and mares rated between 80 and 95, has drawn six entries. The impetus for launching a ratings system in the U.S. has been well documented. Aside from helping racing secretaries card a suitable set of races for their backstretch inventory, such a system gives the connections of a claiming class of horse options to run without fear of losing it. One thing it's not designed to do, those familiar with the system stress, is replace these claiming races, which has long proven the backbone of the U.S. product. While North American is one of the last major jurisdictions to use such a ratings system, it appears to be the first to use an algorithm to generate the numbers (the others use human handicappers). “It's novel to my understanding,” said Chance Moquett, senior manager of strategic solutions at Equibase, the company responsible for building the algorithm. “I believe it's the only algorithmic rating of a population of racehorses in the world right now.” For any such system to work, however, the industry needs to have trust in it. “There's no right or wrong way. But the right way is one that works and people have confidence in,” long-time track executive Rick Hammerle told Steve Byk's radio show last Thursday. “You're only as good as the number.” Hammerle was involved in the building of a previous iteration of the ratings system which fell by the wayside earlier this year, but not with the version that has just launched. According to Moquett, Saturday's ratings-based races are part of a soft launch of a system meant to be refined and improved over time and with experience. “It's not necessarily a polished thing at this point in time. We wanted to make sure that we are continuing to work on it, and that people understand that,” said Moquett. “Feedback is important,” Moquett added. “Feedback in any form is good feedback.”   The Building of the System Since February, around 40 to 50 industry stakeholders within four different “cohort” groups have been working on the system, said Moquett, estimating around “50 formal meetings” as it came together. These four groups comprise the worlds of data science, competition (including trainers and track executives), handicapping and wagering, and the international community. In April, the racing secretaries from 12 different tracks or jurisdictions sent to Equibase a batch of around 20 horses for the team to rate. (The 12 participating racing offices were at Keeneland, Churchill Downs, Gulfstream Park, Maryland, Oaklawn Park, Sam Houston, Prairie Meadows, NYRA, Canterbury, Assiniboia Downs, Del Mar and Santa Anita) “Then we would give back the ratings and ask, 'how does this look? Does this look right?' We worked with each one of those racing offices individually,” said Moquett. That process took a couple months. And then, when Equibase “felt like all the regional racing secretaries were largely pleased with how their selected bands seemed to seem to be rated,” they went back to test five years-worth of data on an individual yearly basis, said Moquett. “That means we took every horse and ran it through a ratings history process for each race,” said Moquett. “We basically re-ran every race for every horse for the calendar year 2020 forward, caught out any outliers.” What were some of those outliers? “We did correlation analysis between purse earnings versus what their figure was at any point in time, to make sure the horses that generally were earning more money were in line [ratings wise]. And we identified that our turf horses seemed to be rated a little bit higher at first,” said Moquett. More broadly, “I think another thing that we found, our rating was a little more volatile to surface switch and performance, and it had a hard time differentiating good horses from the elite level,” said Moquett. The modified result is a multi-factor algorithm that gives horses a numerical rating (from 0-150) based on performance metrics, race class adjustments, surface and distance factors, track-specific variability, and recent form. For a horse to be rated, they must have at least two North American starts. It's updated daily to reflect ongoing race results, so, even if a horse remains in its stall, its rating might fluctuate as its former rivals go out to compete. The formula is based on three main buckets, with the “performance score” providing the core of the ratings. “This has a litany of other factors peppered into it, but in essence, it's how fast did a horse run and how many lengths did it win or get beaten by,” said Moquett. The second is the “race strengths adjustments” component, which looks at things like the class of the race and field strength. The “track and distance adjustments” factor in information like track variance and bias, as well as post position. (A breakdown of the formula can be found here in an FAQ of the new system) The computer algorithm won't be open-sourced-Moquett pointed to the proprietary nature of the system. That said, “we welcome people to come under the hood, see what's going on,” he added. The theoretical ceiling is 150. “I think the highest rating we had during the annual testings was Flightline, who was 136. That's the highest it's ever gotten,” said Moquett. One thing stakeholders should bear in mind, Moquett stressed, is that a numerical rating is different from a speed figure. “A speed figure looks largely at time components of a single race,” said Moquett. “Whereas the Equibase rating takes the body of work in totality and grades aptitude.” As to how the rating stack up to a corresponding weight, that will be up to the individual jurisdiction. “This is not a handicapping tool, nor is it something that Equibase is trying to force on any institution,” Moquett explained. “We do not know yet how close or competitive these things are going to be from a weight standpoint,” Moquett added. “We are intentionally leaving that to the racing offices and the racing secretaries to do as they see fit.”   Actual Numbers For those horses eligible for a rating, these numbers have already been displayed on their Equibase page. While some ratings have raised a few eyebrows, in some cases there appear to be explanations. Take leading middle-distance turf runner (and dual Breeders' Cup winner), Rebel's Romance (Dubawi), rated 90. In comparison, the four-year-old filly Antifona (Recoletos), whose entered in this Saturday's handicap on the downhill turf, is rated 95. Antifona is a stakes-winner who has not yet won a graded stake in three tries. For one, Moquett admits “we are not very good yet at international play.” Furthermore, the Godolphin runner has only had one run so far this year in North America. As Moquett puts it, the algorithm is more accurate the more recent North American starts a horse makes. “We reward consistent activity” said Moquett. In comparison, Antifona has not had a single start in 2025. But the algorithm also factors in the frequency and quality of official works. In Antifona's case, she boasts a busy work-tab leading up to her first run in over 14 months. “Her rating says this filly's working and working well. The last time she ran she was fast. And so, that's how this thing sees it,” said Moquett, explaining Antifona's 95-rating. “Right out the gate, we've got a horse coming off a 14-month layoff,” Moquett added. “Did we give that horse enough of a negative impact or not enough of one? We'll learn. If she wins the race by five lengths, I'm going to feel like we did not do a good job.” Another frequently raised example concerns top three-year-olds Sovereignty and Journalism, who have butted heads twice this year. Both times the Godolphin runner came out on top. And yet, Journalism is rated 104 while Sovereignty is rated 103. “The algorithm isn't saying that Journalism is head and shoulders above Sovereignty. They're relatively equally matched all things considered,” said Moquett. “What makes sense whenever you actually look at the form is our rating gives a little bit of extra credit for Journalism running against older horses in the Pacific Classic,” said Moquett. “What I would challenge people to think about is that we're not saying that horse A is faster than horse B,” Moquett added. “What we're saying is that we believe those two horses are relatively evenly matched within so many points.” The “loudest glaring mistakes” are most likely “fringe players on our rating system,” said Moquett, adding that the system build out so far has focused primarily on the population of horse most likely to fill races, typically at the lower end of the rating range. Attitudes towards the new system among Santa Anita's backstretch community has varied wildly. But if there's one main throughline, it's perhaps one of wait-and-see. “I'm not sure exactly how it's going to work here yet,” said trainer Sean McCarthy. “But I don't have an issue with it. It's one way to keep onto a horse.” “I don't feel like so far I have a great understanding of it. We're just feeling the water out,” said trainer John Sadler, who has Topalo (Tapiture) entered in the dirt handicap. “It's interesting. But it doesn't change the reality of California [a shrinking horse population].” With the launch looming, another question being asked is this: is the system ready? “We'll find out Saturday,” replied Moquett. “I think there's consensus in the industry that a new type of race and a new alternative to run horses is needed.” He added, “I would rather have something delivered and work through a soft launch with racing offices during a time of need-be able to better manage a horse population-than be able to say I can answer every question and defend every example that you bring me because I don't know that we'd ever get to that.” The post Equibase’s New Ratings System Launches Saturday. Is It Ready? appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions. View the full article
    • Racing in Kentucky shifts from Lexington to Louisville Oct. 26 as Churchill Downs opens its 26-day fall meeting with an 11-race "Stars of Tomorrow I" program for 2-year-olds, highlighted by the Street Sense (G3) and Rags to Riches stakes.View the full article
    • Trainer Joe Pride will likely keep stable star Ceolwulf (NZ) (Tavistock) to a mile as he looks to round off his spring campaign with a first trip away. The five-year-old son of Tavistock ran out a ready winner of the Gr.1 King Charles III Stakes (1609m), defending his crown, despite having gone winless in the ensuing 12 months. “It has been good to us that day. Over the last three years we have won two King Charles and an Everest (Think About It), but our luck will run out eventually on that day. It’s been a good run,” Pride said. “It’s 12 months ago now that he won that race and, in the period in between, for two preparations, he’s put in some runs that have had me scratching my head and thinking was there a chance that that was just him at his absolute best. “To see him do it again last Saturday gives me great confidence that going forward, we’re still working with the same horse, and a horse that is going to win most races that he competes in when he performs to that level.” Pride will now set his sights on the Gr.1 Champions Mile (1600m) on the final day of the Flemington carnival. “It is unusual for one of mine to have had this many starts (24) and not had a trip away, but I’d love to bring him down to Flemington,” Pride said. “I’d say we’ll stick to the mile. He’s won three Group Ones at a mile now, and although I do need to see him at 2000m again at some stage, I don’t think it needs to be straight away. I’d say we’ll be down to Melbourne for the Champions Mile.” Pride would dearly love to set the gelding for the 2026 Gr.1 Cox Plate (2040m) but given there is only seven days between the King Charles and the Cox Plate, it is a case of one or the other. “To have a crack at the Cox plate, I’m going to have to forgo the chance to run for a third King Charles,” he said.  “I’m going to have to be convinced in the autumn that he runs a strong 2000m to set him for the Cox Plate, because I’m not going to sacrifice that chance to win that race again for an outside chance of winning a Cox Plate.” “It will probably be in the Gr.1 Queen Elizabeth Stakes (2000m) in the autumn, but, if he shows me that he’s really strong at 2000m, I’ll give it a go.” Ceolwulf was bred by Cambridge Stud owners Sir Brendan and Lady Jo Lindsay and is a son of the Shamardal mare Las Brisas. The gelding is a graduate of the 2022 New Zealand Bloodstock Ready to Run Sale, where Pride and part-owner Leighton Howl went to $170,000 to secure him from Riversley Park’s draft. Ceolwulf has now had 24 starts for six wins, seven placings and A$9.13 million in stakes, plus a one-off $750.000 Emerald bonus for winning both the Gr.1 Epsom Handicap and King Charles last spring. View the full article
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...