-
Available Subscriptions
The Rest of the World
82,883 topics in this forum
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 136 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 133 views
-
-
- Journalists
Kentucky Derby Q & A With B. Wayne Hughes
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 145 views
-
- Journalists
Kameko Pointing to QEII
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 134 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 140 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 143 views
-
-
- Journalists
New York-Breds to Take Spotlight on Showcase Day
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 128 views
-
- Journalists
Letruska Holds On in Shuvee Stakes
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 193 views
-
- Journalists
El Bayern First Black-Type Winner for Bayern
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 130 views
-
- Journalists
Bayern Filly Last to First in Muskoka S.
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 135 views
-
- Journalists
Ketner Sweeps NJ Thoroughbred Festival Card
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 148 views
-
- Journalists
Distorted Humor Filly Rolls in Del Mar Unveiling
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 131 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 159 views
-
-
- Journalists
Audarya Camp Mulling Options
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 145 views
-
- Journalists
Upstart Colt Graduates in Debut at Ellis
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 229 views
-
- Journalists
Jim Crowley Reaches 2000-Win Milestone
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 166 views
-
- Journalists
Delia Bushell Stood Down From The Jockey Club
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 124 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 228 views
-
-
- Journalists
Authentic Puts in Final Derby Tune-Up
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 237 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 138 views
-
-
- Journalists
Bushell Leaves British Jockey Club
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- Journalists
Gleneagles Colt Strikes at Group Level in Japan
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 150 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 141 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 136 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 137 views
-
Announcements
-
Posts
-
You would have to wonder how long the TAB is going to continue with OTG? Watched almost all of it tonight for the first time, anyone that hasnt watched it before would be horrified surely? Grown men acting like teenagers, stomping around the office shaking hands like kids when they get a collect! They were not betting responsibly at all despite the TAB and Betcha advertising the point! The wagering was all over the place and they started with near $20k and lost the lot!!! They had $4k and $2.5k win bets on greyhounds that the TAB accepted despite other punters not being allowed to wager a couple of hundred???? Nothing personal against any of the 4 presenters, however they must be getting told to act like idiots in front of the camera for some reason, as it is hard to believe that they would be acting like this away from the camera? Is there really anyone that thinks that this OTG is really painting racing in NZ in a good light???? If it is such a great thing for racing, then why doesnt Australia have such a show?? Go back to having one professional presenter on a Thursday night that knows what they are talking about, and let the punters offload to increase turnover and profit! -
It just shows you how the TAB treats punters differently? So the Out The Gate presenters are allowed a bet on to net $50,000!! Yet other punters are restricted to netting a few hundred??? Appalling!
-
Not sure if that is a serious question or not. I can't really be bothered answering if you don't know but here's a quick AI summary to get you started. Do your own homework. Yes — there is a very strong and well‑documented relationship between stakes (purse money) and field size / starter numbers in racing. This relationship is recognised internationally and is a key factor in racing economics. Below is a clear summary using citable evidence. 📈 1. Higher stakes = larger fields (more starters) This relationship comes from basic economics: bigger financial incentives attract more owners and trainers to enter horses. Evidence: International racing economic analysis A major review of global racing metrics shows that jurisdictions that offer higher stakes produce larger field sizes and more starts per horse, because owners have a stronger economic incentive to race. [mdpi.com] This pattern is consistent worldwide: High‑stake jurisdictions (e.g., Hong Kong, Japan) have high average field sizes and high betting turnover. Jurisdictions with proportionally lower stakes (e.g., USA) have smaller fields and fewer horses per race. [mdpi.com] This confirms that purse levels directly influence how many horses line up. 📊 2. Stakes increases correlate with increased field size and starts A concrete example appears in U.S. racing data: When purses rose ~8%, field sizes increased 3.57%, and total starts increased 11.5% (an additional 1,675 starters). [pastthewire.com] This demonstrates a measurable response: raise stakes → more horses in the gate. 🏇 3. Why stakes affect starter numbers The connection is logical and supported by economic modelling: Owners enter more horses when: The expected return improves The financial risk of training decreases relative to potential payout The cost of transportation and preparation becomes justified Trainers also support higher stakes because: Their percentage earnings increase Competitive opportunities expand Connections are more willing to run horses more frequently Bioeconomic modelling (Massey University) confirms that financial incentives are one of the three major moderators determining racing industry behaviour and horse utilisation, directly affecting field size -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Which they could gain at any number of racetracks. No bias, no emotion that's just a fact. -
No but it would be good if they got some cement out and did some plastering so you don't end up with crumbled concrete in your hair if you want to sit out in front of the stand.
-
-
Topics
-
