Politics

i see n40 racing had the first of its 3 high priced purchases from last years yearling sales,line up at the trials last week. The questions i have are ..is it normal for horses sold at nz yearling sales  a year ago, to not change ownership officailly. ..And is it normal for the stipes to allow horses to start at trials,knowing that hrnz has the owner as someone who hrnz themselevs have publicised is not the owner and of course the stipes would have known that.   I mean,maybe it is within the rules for hrnz to let horses start,when they obviously know the owners listed aren't correct.Will the stipes not only allow it to start at the trials,but can it race under ownership that sold it over a year ago.  maybe someone can clarify what hrnz allow,i have read the rule . Is there some type of preferential treatment being shown for a big player,or does hrnz and the stipes allow all owners to run horses at trials and races,knowing the owners shown arenot  the actual owners. . i note all 3 of the horses bought over a year ago at the sales by N40 racing, are still owned by the breeders who sold them at the sales,according to hrnz.  

Yes @Thomass gets away with a lot online.

Fawcett should've had the book thrown at her. There's few worse sights in a race than an imbecile like Fawcett exiting a beautiful trailing position behind the leader (who carried on and won the race) well before the turn, carving up anything and everything in the process then not having the horse power to improve the position she exited FFS. This is incompetence personified and Fawcett isn't alone with this disease. Furthermore, it's preposterous Pinn was indicted and found guilty of careless riding whilst endeavouring to halt an errant jockey... on a pilgrimage.  

Little bastard got off real light.

Really @Thomass!?