Thomass

Seriously..let it go...then take some comprehensive comprehension 101's Of course you referred to his opinion when you said...." he wasn't referring to WFA racing"... ....when he was...'GENERICALLY' speaking...do you even know what that means? After he said..."Or, we could say that a horse gets the mares allowance only until she wins a Group One against males." You said.." he went some lengths to be clear he WAS NOT referring to WFA racing" When not only G 1's in Europe are all WFA but the ENTIRE Group system As for RBH " contributing to the rate of decline in revenue" What a load of unadulterated crap... You and the other Sultan of Sophistry dreams of a return to some other system that none of our competitors have and expect the World to suddenly start investing here? pfttt

It's pointless debating you mate... Your knowledge base is coming from base ignorami...a disease that has its feelers all over the net... "Yeahh... Thommo's's having a 'mare isn't he? Now I think I need a drink before I can face reading any more of Thommo's nonsense." Then you doubled down with a spray that included fake shit " Group 1 Euro 'Handicaps'...where no Euro Group Racing included Handicaps ...and you thought The Arc was a Handicap You also believe in tooth fairies...as Jockeys claiming 2kg=0.2L... Perhaps you really mean 0.2 secs which is the correct one and universally accepted by those with gravitas.. NZ's smaller than ever horse population is extremely suited to the RBH system... ..it allows an easy transfer between unisex Band racing for more racing opportunities for one... ...and it especially allows a greater movement of Mares into higher Bands with the better Stake money that includes..

Certainly flashed...maybe the close proximity to 2-3 confused Rodge...or he had the boxed Tri and didn't really concentrate amid the wild celebrations?

You're most welcome Chef...I'm here to serve not swerve... To avoid any more f ups they could have attributed Stake Money from the Avondale Guineas 1-5th instead of a The Restricted over inflated Kraka race... ..although the Vella Fella may have had something to say about that... HQ and NZ Bloodstock are tight az

ZZZZ...wakey wakey HQ...wtf took you so long?? Anyone would have thought you've been HIBERNATING with NO RACING in the Queen's City for 3 months? While the CEO was holidaying in Hawaii with Davo and Kazza from Te Arkow.. So finally the 'Management' and the 'Board' met up for a dose of mid winter Mouldy Vino to discuss the DERBY f up... You know where back to last place money in the Kraka Mill was counted towards a Derby start qualification...and a G2 placegetter was left off thanks to a slow nag running last...and getting a Derby start wtf I hear you say? And stone moi dead and call moi 'bleedin' obvious' They've changed DA RULES OK.? But get this...It was "IN DEPTH" Hahahahaha Just as well the Bored didn't get too pissed and forget what they were there for then? Lets hope they'll remind the EMPLOYEE Starters to chuck on all the Gear as well next year... Which they left off the runner up...and forgot to tell their Employers... Which fell upon moi's shoulders to inform the poor ignorami Management there... It was the Derby Fock up to end all cock ups this year...let's face it

Hello Weas...come in number 69...your times up...hello 69....

Haha, You were nearly right weasel! Rodgy said the 3rd horse..."watch this horse Rodders..could be anything"

Just going back over the review.... ...and you're dead right...Debbie used it 4/5 times Then wrt MALAMBA " were using this race as a trial...concerned about the track too" Goes straight to the front and blitzes them! Not a good listen at all... NZ trainers really have no idea about the meaning of INTEGRITY when it comes to the crunch.. Perhaps too honest??

F me...is this a wind up? You're as stupid as your mate... Oh yea you're right about there being a shit load of non G1 WFA races over there eh? And when he mentions the 'ARC' it's probably about the Auckland RC and not the WFA ARC at Long f in Champ...in the FUTURE.? FFSx 2

And you're too thick to realise WFA includes not only age but sex allowances.. ITS A GENERIC TERM FFS Hes talking about ENABLE winning in a WFA race then receiving a penalty for winning... "Or, we could say that a horse gets the mares allowance only until she wins a Group One against males. After that, she must race against males on level terms. It would be a pretty simple tweak to make and there’s no way it would stop a horse like Enable from going back to the Arc after she’s won it once."

The article says a penalty if she wins... But then says he accepts the physical inadequacy of a 3yo...even though Mares are also 'inadequate' cf on average to Males..albeit less so You can't have Madeira with high tea then Pav on another day

Stakeholders have read all this stuff.... How absurd to suggest a Mare should receive a penalty for winning a G1 WFA Itd be like a more solidly built Stallion penalised for beating a less physically developed Gelding at WFA

That's what he said..not me Youre in denial if you think the sex component is on a par physiologically... Its like Carsa Semenya telling us her bits are all tickety boo..claiming an allowance...then finding she's got other add ons... The Industry could weigh all horses to level the physical deficit in sex and age... ...or simply accept WFA has always been accepted as a means to find the best athlete...

Oh my... Of course it suggests there was NO HELP at all...helped to zero degree As for the rubbish Brit research... I thought we raced in NZ...correct me if I'm wrong.... ...besides most Punters with any idea...pick and choose just how worthy of the allowance each App rides to... ...especially in H 11 bogs

I'm sick of playing your silly little games of miscomprehension.... Moi.."If starting off at level weights without a Fillies allowance, the physically superior Colt should win." You.."Why? The filly has 50kgs of body weight less to carry." Clearly your'e suggesting the Filly will be competitive with less body weight...

I think you'll find this covers it... "yes and thinks an apprentice allowance helped the winner of the Taumarunui Cup" ...so obviously didn't 'help' the winner at all... Your understanding of the Englaise is very poor at most times curio... ...on a par with your bff alma mater in fact

Houston we have a problem...a number in fact When you commented that due to a Filly carrying less body weight...she should be just as capable of beating a more robust Colt....which is plain rubbish Then you failed to acknowledge that a Filly having been re-handicapped for running 2nd to a Colt...would then be giving weight to another first starter Colt of equal ability to the last one... Then you tried to tell us that 0.2L (2kgs= 0.2L) was neither here nor there...which NO HANDICAPPER IN THE WORLD accepts... You also ignored the fact Horses winning in their respective sex/age Bands HAVE to be treated the same as each category, I.e. 2- 2 1/2 kgs for winning...penalised in relation to again facing the same group of horses next time... Wrt the Rating 70 band example...the 4Yo Colt with 4 wins could have had 2/ 3 recent misses through illness/training off/ unreported injury...any number of things...therefore dropping 4/5 points...While still retaining a higher than 70 ability sight unseen by an unsuspecting Handicapper... ...who then meets a Mare having raced solely in Mares races...and an early season 3yo Filly with an inexperienced 5 starts...at your equal weights...BARMY Thats how subjective your 'Handicapping' is.. Then, after a Maiden Colt and Filly win at set weights with the sex allowance...both in impressive fashion...you expect them to revert to equal weights in a Handicap next start...is that correct? Let me tell you..that doesn't happen anywhere else either Imagine NZ going alone on this..along with your wider spread...which is extremely unpopular with Trainers/Stakeholders as you know There'd be a mass exodus to other jurisdictions...

They could have at least cleaned the Pidgeon poo off her nose! And in post Tesio death news... ENABLE is inbreed to SADLERS WELLS 3x2... ...and she doesn't even have crossed eyes let alone gonads..

6/8 yesterday ATA.... That Taiki is riding SO well that it's actually totes unfair he's allowed to claim he can't speak English too well let alone 2kgs... ...As for Kavish...it' should be a crime he's allowed 2 kgs as well.. ...it's like 4kgs on an H11...try telling the ignorami that and they explode into apoplectacy....

I'm sorry koppa... ..but you need to seek help...asap..for this affliction... Cindy is not only saving the World but the Universe as well...as your sorry ass... Being a Trump/ Slimon/Bojo triphantic loon...you really do need to get in their ears and tell them protectionism/nationalism will only lead them to a path of self destruction... ..while taking innocents like moi and Cindy down with you... ...may the fleas of a thousand Camels infest your and the trifecta's ass while you do it... ..at least something good will come out of something so bad

Who knew they'd be running 1.24.6 on a H 10 track before the first at Te Rapa?? What a freakin joke... yet they expect Punters to take this b/s and not go to Sports betting...or the Zoo for entertainment? Just give us the EXACT pen reading Boys and Girls... What your giving us now is Punters wearing training wheels information NZTR /RIU ...you're a disgrace to Transparency and Information Technology 101

It's a grey area as they say...a relegation occurred in Australia a couple of years ago but there's no way it'd be happening here.. ...but there's no rule against asking for a ruling here as far as I know at present... France now have the 5 whip limit...Britain 7... One could argue for a 1/2 strike over that before being DQ'd...and for sure it'd stop... Parkes striking Wheelers horse 45 times when winning by a nose while the runner up remains unable to protest is simply ridiculous though..

We're talking a 'Ratings based system' here...you're talking something that's not available any more...HK, AUS, SINGAS ...an RBS where sexs need to mix due to the fact our population base is decreasing.. Imagine that Mare being compared to the Colt and having her performance analysed in comparison... ...she's back racing against her own sex after winning...but only receives a marginal increase in her re -Handicap to the runner up...who has to cop it sweet in your world? Then forcing a new season 3yo Filly to race against older 4yo Colts at level weights off a similar rating is looney tunes... Once the Handicap race has been run off a fair system of WFA allowances then a rating adjustment can be more accurately assessed... I know of no system in the World that forces a same age Filly and Colt to race off the same level weight in a first start Handicap as your system requires either.. No wonder your 'ideas' were turned down by NZTR

Before we had the 'trial' process of getting them fit to race..this is what we had... Punters would assess fitness levels by sharp birdcage analysis and make their choices... Nowdays we also have the various 'market' prices to help us as well...who's screwed up and who isn't... Most Trainers when being interviewed are fairly honest in their assessments these days as well... It is what it is in a difficult environment these days isn't it?

You do what Ellis did...realising our racing has depleted top class Males...the Blue Bloods sold at yearling sales... ...go buy a speedy Australian bred mare who usually dick our slower Mares... You can't adjust a system every couple of years to suit the flavour of the time.... ...and you think 2 kgs = 0.2L as well Maestro?