Look, I never disclosed all the information to Mr Cruikshank's when I made that statement. However, we had not had a very in depth conversation, it was very brief.
I feel he should have asked me why I gave that statement. Instead, I did not hear from him until 2 and a bit months later after the incident and was given my charges through my email.
Do you not think it was unfair that he did not once ask me why I gave that statement after the incident and prior to receiving the charges? He is an investigator after all, so it is his job
He came around the day before (Supposedly to give me my charges), however I was not home. He than decided during that same day (the incident is mentioned in the case, however it had nothing to do with my license) that he wanted to check the microchip number of every dog left on the property and was adamant that he could do it even though the property is de-registered and no licensed people reside on site (which is trespassing).
