May be a matter of semantics. Clubs do have to be registered with the codes but have to do something very bad to be de-registered. Betting licences and dates are issued by NZTAB though no doubt NZTR has an influence on those.
October Operational Performance
Reported Profit for the month was $12.0m, which was $3.1m below Budget.
Operating Expenses were $11.1m for the month, which was $1.1m above Budget.
Year to Date Reported Profit is $33.6m, which was $5.6m below Budget
Year to Date Operating Expenses were $32.1m, which was $1.6m above budget.
Not much. I noted the other day, an industry leader (breeder) who was a key player in getting the 2003 Act in place is now lamenting the lack of quality horses racing in New Zealand and the loss/downgrading of group races.
They might have noticed but if they were going to do something they would have done so a decade or so ago. They all seem to just be resigned to going down with the ship or they are taking to the lifeboats.
Don't really see how they could claim the likes of Feilding as a success story. Total assets are $2.1m investment in RACE which is basically broke.
Marton has $228 in cash and an $805,000 investment in RACE.
That's only sustainable if the less race days generate the same revenue. Don't think that's likely. The wagering spend will just go to other codes and other jurisdictions. Why have a goal of higher stakes anyway? The goal should be a more attractive wagering product that generates sufficient revenue for whatever stakes.
Anyway all this is a decade or so too late and while restructuring the stakes distribution like CS suggests makes sense, it is way too late.
It is like they are expecting the golden goose to land in the interim. But if that's it (geo), and I doubt it, it won't be here in the next 8 months. If the rest of us were faced with revenue cuts of that magnitude with further cuts almost certain, we'd be immediately cutting expenditures to match or we'd be out of business.
That strategy is bizarre. They are going to use up the last of their reserves to maintain stakes for the next 8 months in the context of an $8m cut in revenue. What are they thinking. It is almost certain there will be further distribution cuts for next certain. If so, there will be no option but to reduce stakes for FY24 to align with that on top of the current reduction. They seem to just bury their heads in the sand and hope the golden goose is going to revive. Any other business would be making immediate cuts. It just doesn't make sense.