Please read Reefton's  comments 12.03pm Tues, that is; "bit of an over reaction" to which I concur. Then his comments 5.28pm same day but specifically the last two paragraphs. Then for those that "totally disagree" read the Chief's reply at 6.55pm although bear in mind these two are diametrically opposed to each other.
 
	Now to put aside the 'I'm right, your wrong rhetoric I believe this debacle last Saturday all comes down to poor decisions. The previous gates were getting very tired and the 'upgraded' gates, I suggest was made by settling on a good price, not the best solution. To defend that comment I refer to Leith Innes who was the most animated  I have ever heard him with regards to his distain for starting gates with clip ons. The current CEO of NZTR has not procrastinated and the clip ons are gone. Few fields in reality will be disadvantaged. Yes, big races like the Oaks one may rebut, yet the reality is there will be more than four that really shouldn't be there. Next season the numbers will be back to their usual maximum limits.
 
	I will close with these comments. Collectively we have moaned for many years about which tracks should be or not be closed. We have justifiably gone to a level far higher than moaning, about yesteryears woeful executive. On a positive side we are making a lot less noise regarding infrastructure and the all important stakes levels. This weeks field sizes however reinforce that the Elephant in the room continues to be ignored,...the CALENDAR