Reefton
Members-
Posts
1,703 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
99
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Videos of the Month
Major Race Contenders
Blogs
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Reefton
-
NZRB aka RITA - Big Funding Fail - What will be the spin from NZTR?
Reefton replied to Chief Stipe's topic in Galloping Chat
Surely not!(And I know this is harness racing) Big Dave and his cronies assured us that stakes were to double in the new season. -
Not sure what Cookie would be able to contribute to further your knowledge Thomass. For where I sit you seem to know everything there is to know already.
-
Well whatever I know Thomass would be one thing more than you do. You distinctly said 'The Lindsays will lose heavily over this...' You are commenting on the business of a man who, they tell me, is a very good bloke. You have no idea of his commercial arrangement re the horse(and nor do I) but I feel bloody sorry for him. He could not be said to have had much luck since he took over CS and this doesn't help.
-
I just see he has checked the towel in. Not standing again. The New Zealand racing industry won't miss him
-
Training is a bloody hard game wherever you are from what I can see Bloke (and I suspect it is just as tough in Aussie). Especially trying to get the initial breakthrough in a new location.
-
Just remind me the stakes paid on each of those two days and the percentage of turnover achieved those stakes represent(not that NZ Cup day is anything to skite about in terms of return on investment by the NZ industry) Reality is as Laurie Sutherland has pointed out when it comes to efficient use of industry resources those big clubs toil well in the rear(and always have done). Your average picnic Club props them up well and truly.
-
no the owners stumped up most of it and NZTR the rest
-
You wouldn't know the first thing about Cambridge's arrangement re the horse Thomass(nor would I) so if I were you I would sit back and see what happens. Brendon Lindsay is a pretty sharp operator and he will lose a lot simply on the stud fees let alone anything else but the horse could have got colic anywhere so blaming NZ or Cambridge is drawing a long bow.
-
Those the same North Island trainers that wanted all the courses closed? They want to stick to something they might just know something about and forget about telling the people providing them the opportunities what they should be doing. You only need to look at the impotent position of their own association to know how well organised they are. And since you are a bit thick I will reiterate - the numbers imbalance has been the same for 45 years since the races were first run down here. And again I will reiterate - my experience of North Island Trainers is they don't care about the expense - just load it on the owners. Two of the more prominent up that way(Sharrock and Pike) were trumpeting how they were off to Aussie a couple of years ago. Not too much progress seems to have been made?
-
Don't horses get colic in England Thomass? Why would this instance stop shuttle stallions? There have probably been a thousand shuttle movements in the last twenty years to Australasia and this is one of very few incidents. Perhaps they should stop having tests at Westpac Stadium because Retallick did his shoulder a mischief there. Occasionally these things happen
-
Actually you two would be prime candidates for the Vacancy on the NZTR Board (1) No common sense (2) You want everything for the upper North Island (3) You want to tear apart one of the few things that actually works in NZ racing(and God knows there aren't many) and relocate from a place where almost twenty thousand turn up for a look to somewhere where you will be lucky to get a couple of hundred(based on the view of the grandstand last Herbie Dyke day - room for three hundred people populated by about three) You two are wasted on a social media site - get your CV's in to Bernard pronto!
-
Might not have been bog tracks but there have certainly been plenty of uproars about the standard of tracks presented. I don't think there is another track in the country that attracts critical comment like Te Rapa does(and Ellerslie in the 'bad old days' would have been number two although to be fair Riccarton is not saint where that is concerned). Coincidentally all three have been 'renovated' regularly which proves my point about not touching them. It was lucky someone wasn't killed at Ellerslie with that drain nobody knew about (remarkably that ARC mob and their supporters know all about what is wrong with the rest of NZ racing but have no idea about their own dung hill - Ken Rutherford is another prone to opening his mouth about what should happen elsewhere in the game without looking in his own backyard).
-
Ellerslie or Te Rapa? Bloody great - run them in front of 200 people and with a real risk of a bog track
-
Are you that thick that you can't tell when the piss is being taken?
-
Yeah well that proves the point. Imagine what they would have won by if they had prepared on decent tracks instead of the North Island shit holes.
-
Been off BOAY for a couple of days but coming back to this! Firstly let me make an observation in regards your (quite correct) claim about how good the Ellerslie track is in November when the ARC seem to run one raceday being Melbourne Cup day(they have run the odd one later in the month over the years but generally one). Shiite they must have a lot of confidence in the reliability of their weather and track to run one meeting in the month of November! Clearly it is sheer coincidence that they have had a run of good tracks. I might add I had a look at the times on at least one of those good 3 days and I think the whoppers might have been told about how good the track was(2.08 for a G3 2000m race on a good 3 track?) . Riccarton aren't above a bit of that sort of trick themselves however so we will let that slide. But lets imagine I am a trainer with a colt I think might just be good enough to make a stallion but I am not 100% sure of his liking for wet ground (bearing in mind seven of the last ten 2000 Guineas winners have gone to stud versus two Derby winners so it is fair to say that the 2000 is a better 'Stallion' race than the Derby). Debatable whether either race is a feather in a horse's cap stallion wise given the state of NZ racing but I guess not every promising young NZ horse is a Dundeel who can match it in Aussie. Now am I going to risk buggering his reputation by running him in races like the Bonecrusher or the Sarten race where tracks could be bogs or would I be better to go south to the Coupland/John Grigg and/or Canterbury Stakes(where history suggests the surfaces - and therefore the Horse's winning chances - are more reliable)? I will give you the Hawkes Bay Guineas but they seem to have given up on the Great Northern Guineas and Wellington Guineas at that time of year(wonder why?). Jimmy Choux and Sacred Falls could clearly handle the mud so I guess it made b-all difference to them. The formula Te Akau seems to have used successfully (I think they have won four of the last eleven) is send them South early and you really have to say it seems to be a very wise idea(three of those four and all three of their winning colts turning into stallions(to date not setting the world alight but Embellish and Xtravagant have the test to come) And then your claim about trainers being concerned about costs - having had(shares in)horses with prominent Trainers in the north it strikes me that a lot of them don't give an eff what the cost is(that is the owners issue) when it comes to travelling or anything else and as often as not tell the press that the trip will make the horse. I reckon if the horse farted one of those trainers would send you a bill for smelling it! From my understanding there is a horse flight south every Tuesday so what is the logistics issue(getting them home is another matter but the damage is done by that time)? Then this continual bleating about the imbalance of South Island horses - well I think there have been about five South Island winners in 45 years so whats new? Southern three year olds are not competitive at that time of year(nor are many of the older horses to be fair) and Southern trainers recognise that. The way Pitty and others compete strongly at Wellington Cup time shows the delay in getting Southern horses up to a competitive level in the season(and Pitty gave a demo with Savvy Coup about not pushing a top liner that early in the year by picking up top dosh in lesser NZ Cup week races). AND as Pam said Cup Week is unquestionably the best Carnival in NZ racing(and probably the best attended on the two big days at least) so if it ain't broke why fix it?
-
oh yes we can see how well that has gone by how keen they are to test it out in the bowels of the winter this year. And if they have had a decent result(to be fair it appears so so far) it will be a fluke To (sort of) paraphrase Meatloaf 'don't be sad cos one out of about a bloody hundred(track renovations) ain't bad'
-
Well (1) you quoted statistics about North Island horse domination of those races numbers wise as if it is a recent phenomena. Go back through the 45 years those races have been run at Riccarton and you will see it is no worse than it ever was (2) that carnival is one of the shining lights of NZ racing(God knows there aren't many) and 1000 Guineas day is one of if not the best attended galloping raceday in NZ (3) as I mentioned at that time of year you are liable to run into a bog track in the North(vastly less likely in the South) and (4) witness the number of North Island horses that turn up in the south as early as September each year to take advantage of the better weather (admittedly mainly Te Akau but in recent years Latta, Pike, Lowry Cullen et al) If you want to race the guineas races at that time of year AND to make it look reasonably attractive the South is the only place for it(unless you want to take them to Ruakaka of course - it really looks good at that time of year)
-
Riccarton in November is a vastly more reliable surface than say Ellerslie is in November. Keep up
-
I did mention 'if they can afford it'. Since they are not interested in my opinions I don't bother looking at what their performance is like (ie no idea what the annual turnover is but I do know the $150M distribution figure
-
Fair comment.
-
Re the twenty minutes interval thing the way to do that is to have a set of stalls reserved for horses in the next race where they are required to be prior to the previous and as close to the weighing room as poss. Saddles out and on and in parade ring within ten minutes and off to the start. Make D Walsh the sole adjudicator of enquiries in the south and someone equivalent in the North.
-
North Island not frigging NZ!
-
Yeah sorry about that. Just read the 'shut the coast' comments and thought here we go again. NZ treats the Coast like shit (in far more ways and areas than racing) and it gives me the shits. I gave Bernard all he was looking for and I will continue to defend the place. We owe nobody anything and we aren't giving up our racing when we are perfectly viable. Thats the whole point - the self sufficient get the life booted out of them and the bludgers sail happily onwards with smug looks on their gobs. My plan would right he ship in that regard
-
Yep! And risk running them on shit hole tracks like the NZ is prone to at that time of year