mardigras

You can try and help some people. But they won't listen. Case in point being Point Score - at $68.8 starting price on betfair.

Can you let us know what today's blue print winners are tomorrow. Sorry I forgot, you were going to do that anyway.

It's a simple matter of highlighting just how stupid your methods/your Blue Print is. It's been smashed. Even the letter P and the letter M are more useful. And now just another winner at Te Aroha. Too easy.

And just like that - Moiras Town. Double figures - easy. That one wasn't over bet. M and a person's name.

Well I delivered Paisley Park - before the races - unlike you. And the letter P for this month has been known for some time. We'll tell you the tips tomorrow morning - after the races - like you and ATA do.

Only someone like you who stalks these females would think the way you do. You're a sicko. If it's acceptable for her to 'not rock the boat', then it's acceptable for the rest also.

Odd - goes to show what you think is funny. It wasn't designed to be humorous. If you'd got onto what was announced as the letter of the month being 'P' , you wouldn't have needed your stupid BP - and you could have multied those two up along with Play That Song, Prise De Fer and Platinum Invador for more like 2500-1 - a lot more than your 40-1. You stick with your 40-1 BP, we'll stick with the letter of the month.

There will be no rocking of the boat from her - for exactly the same reasons. Funny how you think that's OK.

For sure, for some, there would be too many to mention.

Just like horses that start with the letter M. People are drawn to them. You get horses with names starting like Magnificent, Momentous, Magical. Imagine a horse called Mince Pie. Some people would be drawn to backing it. If it were people who worked at the TAB, the letter S is over bet - horses with names such as Sausage Roll or Sausage Sizzle gets them going. Thomass on the other hand would be drawn into over betting horses that start with the letter F - Fraudulent Freddie or Fake News for a couple of examples.

To be expected when an industry puts so much focus on racing elsewhere. They are happy making NZ racing a bit part until it winds down completely.

Here's one that has been stated many times this year. The letter for 2019 is the letter M. Simply outstanding again on boxing day. Money Trail, Master Painton and Macron (19s, 46s and 17s). Hope you got on.

I think they should do things that are fair for punters - but not reduce integrity in doing so. In this scenario, there is no guarantee that the amount paid back to punters collectively is more - if they late scratched such a runner. It could be less overall - meaning more money for the bookies.

The only ignorant one here is you. I'm all for punters being treated fairly. But I'm far more interested in having integrity in racing. And I'll be looking forward to all riders having to weigh in. Since the horse finishing last that was under weight, was never a chance for the punter - before it left the starting gates. Other unselfish punters won't mind that being a late scratching. I like how you talk about all these unselfish punters, as if you have even half a clue. Go and ask a punter that puts $100k on a horse to place at $2 if he would be happy if the horse ran 2nd and the $1.60 horse won but weighed in light - and was declared a late scratching. Sure he would be saying. Of course I'm happy. Because I'm not selfish. Idiot.

I'm confident you introduced the supposed issue of a jockey being warned about drug testing. You can't have it both ways, although you seem to want to.

Bad luck punters. Whichever way, punters get screwed. Some get screwed from a late scratching, some get screwed if it isn't a late scratching. Best to not affect the punters that had nothing to do with the horse that raced outside the rules. The jockey should learn from their errors. That's why it should be a massive penalty. Make sure all know the significance of trying it on and going a bit too far.

It's not me that isn't copping the f on. It's you that isn't able to cop anything on. It's because you are retarded. I've never stated any correlation between driving 5kms over the speed limit and drugs while riding. Sadly, flashing lights at someone doesn't differentiate the oncoming drivers as to whether they are traveling 5kph over the limit, 50kph over the limit, driving drunk or drugged. You're happy to tell them all that they should beware of the potential for being the target of police activity. Good on you for putting other drivers at risk - just so long as you escape a paltry fine for breaking the road rules. You've publicly endorsed drunk and/or drugged drivers being warned of police presence on the roads. Endorsing them to be given the flashing light to slow down. Stop them being caught with drugs on this occasion, before they potentially kill someone in the future doing the same thing. Just as in the case with a jockey being warned.

You've stated it on here. You want to be warned, which also warns potentially drugged/drunk drivers - so that they can possibly kill others on the road further on. Very noble of you. Exactly the same scenario you think is disgraceful in the world of jockeys. Warning someone to prevent them being caught this time - to allow them to potentially risk others at a later time. Something you think is fine when you are involved, but not for others. Typically two-faced. A sane person would consider both scenarios the same way, whether in favour of or not. But not you. It's so easy to make you look stupid. No doubt because you are.

You want drivers to put their fellow drivers at risk because you want a driver to warn you, so that you can drive 5km+ over the speed limit, and as a result of that, end up warning a drunk or drugged driver who then slows down to maybe kill someone else down the road due to their potentially impaired driving. Good one.

So if the cops are testing for drugs/alcohol and not speed, then you'd have a problem with cars flashing lights to warn other drivers then.

Yes, I don't think it is illegal to flash your lights due to a police presence/speed camera. I believe they can ticket you however if they believe that flashing your lights is a hazard to other traffic. Bit of a stretch, for sure.

Thomass, barry has given you some nice Christmas wishes. I'll even give you a Christmas present or two. Don't write post race crap and you won't be subjected to the level of ridicule you get. - I just hope you reflect on this 'present' and consider it as 'gold'. Second present, back whatever is put up on the 'other site' pre race. And then thank them later. (I wouldn't bother with what they put up post race, you can't put a bet on those). And don't be too harsh on the princess. She isn't puncture proof. Merry Christmas - even you can find the odd winner (as can a dartboard).

I think it can be - i.e you can be ticketed for doing so.

FFS, the thread was about Christmas. I stated what I was doing. It certainly didn't require comment from a total fwit like you. Why didn't you ask your brother which airport he was flying from and what the parking costs, so you could go and see him off. You are a retard. Sadly, there isn't a lot of help you can get for that condition. A site fucker.

The rules are simple. Jockeys know what they are. No need for more rules. Just more cost for the industry. And such a rule would reduce integrity. Seems you don't care about that after all.