mardigras

You are welcome to think what you like. But the notion of what you suggest has no use to anyone else. So as you basically say - it is 100% meaningless information to anyone else except yourself - since you are unwilling to share as to when it is useful. And clearly you are incapable of demonstrating that it is effective - even for yourself. Although I like the information you have provided post race. Most useful. Which leads me to repeat my previous indications. Why bother with worrying about the gear change given not a single person here is able to provide a single horse that will benefit from the application - before the races. Ignoring blinkers has zero affect on my account balance. I punt to win and have done so for years - mostly by ignoring the very thing you are saying I ignore at my peril. I haven't noticed any peril. But thanks for the unsubstantiated advice. I love these sites. Full of people with such useful opinion. But when it comes to actual substance. Nothing. You could say you like backing horses that start with the letter 'L'. And ignoring them is at my own peril. That is how useful your post is. You may even have one tomorrow that is starting with the letter 'L' and that you are looking forward to seeing how that goes. Which is why I love people like you. You create the very prices that I exploit. So keep it up. I bet based on the very notion that the gear changes don't work. I bet successfully. You claim you bet based on the very same gear changes being successful for you. But aren't prepared to show that. I wonder why? What are you afraid of? Being found out?

Love this. Thanks. But really, why do you have to make it so easy for every one else? Why don't you tell us BEFORE the races, the next time blinkers on first time is going to make a positive difference. Can't wait. For every one of these, you'll be not telling us about the 20 others that run down the track. But we do like to hear about the winners. For sure.

Maybe Thomass should put his bet up since he claimed to have it.

You did it the hard way. The letter 'I' and the letter 'L' are the letters of the day there today. When that happens, you add 100%. Luckily got R2 as well. Easy.

There are no population stats that can give you a relationship with a horses ability relative to its competitors. They don't work that way. Using them like that is flawed.

It certainly has. Just more useless stupid stats that only a moron would use to justify the ridiculous. It's not worth writing why. I've stated why using stats to assess an upcoming race is flawed. Some can't grasp that. There's little point in repeating it. The best answer is to tell them to go and get a proper education as they missed out the first time. Which is the case with the resident nutter.

I've never degraded Melody Belle. I simply stated that the vast majority of the horses to race well and win group races in NZ are not of an international standard. Of course there are exceptions.

Are the best horses running around Turkey good? Or are they only considered good in Turkey? Or in other countries like New Caledonia. Or India etc. The best that race in NZ are obviously 'good' here. But they generally aren't good from an international perspective.

You still here? Thought you'd be down at Specsavers.

Clearly Thomass has been smashed again. And all he has is more of his usual lies and crap. Next time - just admit you and your mate are both blind. And you're stupid for believing such crap.

Aren't you humiliated supporting this notion. Have a watch of the overhead. If that's 'very straight', tell your mate he needs glasses. Drunken sailor springs to mind. Couldn't even run straight when it was in the clear. You just believe everything these trainers say. Idiot.

Sorry you've taken this badly. I certainly do think he would have won without the headgear. Easily. That's my opinion, maybe Hayes has a different one. Do you think O'Brien thinks Constantinople should have been wearing all that gear? How dare O'Brien have a different opinion than Hayes. As for the cup, the horse could win with or without any gear. It's as simple as that. Whether he does win won't have anything to do with whether he wears it. If he wears it and wins, he would win without it. It's as simple as that. One thing is for sure, his price is lower than it should be wearing the gear. As it was in the Caulfield Cup. Mugs like you jump on things like that. Hayes gets plenty wrong. He gets plenty right. Now he seems to want to blame Nolen so has dumped him for the cup. Poor Hayes. Diddums. Did he get it wrong putting Nolen on in the Caulfield Cup. He'll say no. Maybe he should take a closer look at what he did. You put these people on some sort of pedestal. No wonder you are such a loser at punting. So much conflicting opinion from all the trainers.

They do look after their shit shovellers well. So pleased to see they did that with you too. You've been found out more times than most people can count to. Your stupidity on head gear and especially with Hayes is so funny. He put the gear on - that's 100% why I laid him. So thanks for your advice. Sorry to hear you lost your dosh on the Caulfield Cup. Heck, even I managed to get a small win from the race. Don't blinkers make them run faster in UK/Ire? Wow what an admission.

Have you actually met Hayes? No, didn't think so. Maybe Hayes should tell Aidan O'Brien he doesn't know shit. You believe too much of what these people say. Try using your eyes and some facts for a change - rather than opinion.

What it means is that the guy you said was so good at putting on head gear first time - he did it in a $5m race and came up short (again). Bad luck to those punters that followed your advice and made it favourite. Next start, it isn't putting that gear on first time. Maybe he'll try some new gear next start. The horse was unlucky you claim. Probably was. Unlucky Hayes put the gear on since he met trouble because of it.

He knows about the 'apparent' best go fast. I'm not so sure. My personal opinion is the horse would have won without the gear. Something we will now never know. Don't worry, it was only a $5m race

There is no point responding to you. You've just resumed from where you left off. Some imbeciles can't learn. You are one of them.

based on your record, that would be another loser. No wonder you have to stick to blow up dolls. Based on the bets you put up, there is more than enough liquidity for bets your size.

I didn't say I only bet on NZ racing. But I bet on NZ Racing. And I win - or I wouldn't do it. I'm not into making charitable donations to NZ racing. I certainly get more from NZ racing than you do. Given you lose.

Are you saying my betfair account isn't proof of winning here? Yet one day's results on NZ TAB is? Funny world you live in since my account was for 15 years of activity. Yours was one day.

But as has been shown. I do win 'here' - and I do so before the races, not in fantasyland where you reside. That's one of the key differences between you and me. Another key difference is that you are stupid. Listen to Fred for once.

Beauties for sure. It's one of the reasons why I win and you lose. You get caught up in stupid stats. I see you're back to fuck this site once again.

Still can't read, since my response was suggesting I doubt he could win. As for plagiarism - you're the leader in that. Remember Cheltenham?

That's right - which makes the NZ gallops revenue tiny in comparison to RV. And nowhere near the same ratios above. And the revenue for RV is from THEIR gallops racing. NZ gallops racing by itself doesn't have any revenue. As barry stated, there is no interest in racing here and NZ gallops is lucky to get a free ride on the other revenue streams available.

I'm not sure why you state that 'tends to be the way' etc. Based on what? I don't give any additional credence to a post of a person's opinion based on whether the poster is anonymous or not. I simply take the post and determine its merits myself.