mardigras

I' wouldn't call asking a single question being a quizmaster now. But then, some of you over here aren't that smart. Do you need some help? If I wanted to be quizmaster, I would have asked something like what price did she pay on the NZ TAB to win? Although that is too easy. So probably something more like "what was the last day in NZ gallops racing that the race favourite won x races in a row on the NZ TAB tote prices", something along those lines.

You sure did write about 7 horses. 4 of them were your selections for the 4 races. And as stated. You did well, you actually had one of them win at 2s. The other 3 horses were 'savers'. You're trying to convince punters that you now went out and backed savers as if they were your main selection in each race. Luckily, most aren't as stupid as you think. The funny part of all this is that we all know you are a loser. Don't feel bad about that. Most punters are, you're just probably a little worse than the majority. It's good to come on here and clarify your bullshit that generally goes unquestioned. Just paste that on your wee fella. Print it small so that it will fit.

But in all of that, Thomas has never done anything better. He even crows about his 'masterclass' which was where he selected 4 horses - one won paying 2s. A couple of 'savers' he had won, but acknowledging savers is akin to me suggesting I would have backed The Gordonian to actually win money, not just cover my investment. The issue for me is you have one person prepared to speak up before the races - and you have another that claims all amount of success after the races are run. barry didn''t claim to win today from the race, he just claimed to have priced it in a manner that was pretty decent - and I would agree - if assessing it in a reasonable way.

I like the way you are so quick to criticise those that put something up before the race. But you seem incapable of putting up anything pre-race yourself. What are you afraid of? Or are you just another Thomass? A Monday punter that knows f'all, just happy to criticise but offer nothing?

Nine months. Not bad. Shame about the other 270 odd days. I've put up a huge number of selections pre race. Go and work out the profit. Or ask your sister to help you since we know you and maths don't get on. You are the only liar here. Your post before was a total lie. Heaps know it. All the ones that read that saga know it. You just continue pretending to be something you aren't. Because you're a fraud. I've proven my situation before. Not one day of punting like you, who actually thinks that means anything. 15 years worth is what I put up. I have no idea what the rest of your usual crap is about. You found me out? About what? That I co-wrote a book. Yep, sure did. Finding that out wasn't a big deal. It wasn't a secret.

That is a lie. You were asked to present proof of your bullshit over a period of more than NINE months. Then one day, you got some wins. Well done. Most punters will win - it only took you nine months to do so. And what you posted was absolutely not 'certified'. Why can't you put up a selection you've already backed at fixed odds. You're always claiming how you got fixed odds on your bullshit. . Can't hurt your bets. You won't because you're a fraud and you've been found out. As I say, you're a fraud. And the good part is, you know it - as should anyone else that reads your crap. Your posts are repetitive bullshit. It drives people off this site, just like me.

Yes, but if I put $1 to win on all of your tips at generally available prices, would I be a winner? If not, then your tips arent really tips, they just a set of selections. If you did that with every selection I have put out on any forum you can find, you will have easily been a winner. Doubled your money even. If your tips don't make a profit on level stakes, I'm pleased they are seen by millions. Helps with those punters that prefer winning than following tips such as yours. So thanks.

I don't throw toys. I move on. Once idiots like you are involved, there is no point. You're a site fucker. Remember racechat. You did the same there. Just look at this site now. You've fucked another one. Well done.

You drive people off this site. This is my last post on BOAY. Nutters like you can talk amongst yourselves. I'll post where I don't have to put up with crap from you. But feel safe in the knowledge that trainers of the like of Waller, Waterhouse etc over a 6 and a half year period put blinkers on last start winners - returning a whopping 23c in the dollar if you backed them and won only 8% of the time. And funnily enough, if you backed their last start winners that didn't get the treatment, they returned over 93 cents in the dollar and won over 21% of the time. All because trainers don't apply blinkers fresh up on winning horses unless they're on the job. Thanks for highlighting how gullible you are.

I tried that Freda. The entire gallops site filled up with his threads. He wrote to himself. There was no point visiting the site. Even now, he started 17 of the last 25 threads. 4 of the last 25 threads have had 20+ replies. Only one of his. Most of his are just him responding to himself. He won't go away. Gallops now has about 5 posters on it - rarely. Thomass and the chief in the main. But I will stop on this topic.

Maybe Waller should give up training. Just punt. Same with McDonald. He shouldn't have bothered coming back to ride. Just do a bit of farming and punt with all those skills.

So the trainers don't know this. I thought they knew stuff like this being horsemen. Go on, tell them how stupid they are and how wrong they've been for every start the horse has had. You put these people on a pedestal. But as of right now according to you, Waller couldn't work that out and McDonald could. Is Waller thick? And even in your own stupid post - sharing more opinion - which supposedly you don't listen to. He says might. She might also go worse with blinkers on. You're so gullible. These people try this stuff all the time. And Waller's record with Ear Muffs and Blinkers on is atrocious compared to his record without. Does he only put them on useless horses? I'm definitely not an expert on gear. neither are you. Since you don't know when they might assist and when they don't. You just listen to trainers and jockeys - of which more often than not, they get it wrong.

Who cares. Now you must know what she needs better than Weir and Waller. How stupid are they not to have put them on her for the Oaks or even last start to make the win even easier on her. Don't they know anything. Send them an email and tell them how they've both got it so wrong.

Cheers Hesi. Thomass thinks I don't have a sense of humour - the reality is I don't find what he calls humour at all humorous. His type is basic and crass - which isn't actually funny at all except to low intelligent people like himself.

Yes Hesi. No point asking for selections from a proven fraud.

Thanks for sharing something you couldn't work out for yourself. What it has to do with the names you call yourself or this thread, I have no idea.

There isn't a font that small.

You didn't post that the readers should take the quinella or the trifecta. yet you claimed them afterwards. You did post, that they were savers. But when they won, you wanted to have them in your multis etc. trifectas and quinellas. Because you're a fraud.

Yep, and when he posted some results suggesting he knew what he was talking about. It was after 9 months of waiting. Nine whole months to then come up with one day of profit. And he goes on about a run of outs others have. 9 months is a pretty decent run of outs. You'd have to search a long time to find a bigger fraud.

He did once. 4 horses. 1 won paying $2. 3 savers that meant he didn't lose the lot - bit still lost. I'd hate to see what he calls a bad day.

As opposed to the mainly one poster on the gallops section of this site, backslapping himself. You were so excited about In A Twinkling barrier blanket update getting to the RacingNSW stewards - shame they didn't bother putting the info out in their pre raceday stewards report, their real time generated form guide, but put it on just one of their gear change pages. And forgot to tell other sites like Racing Australia and Racing & Sports.

Doesn't matter where it is. It's there and visible to any. And it's before the races. try it sometime. You came on here yesterday - and you didn't have the balls to write on the event before the race. What did it feel like when they castrated you?

What's dodgy about it. About as dodgy as Thomas putting up selections from other channels saying they were PM'd to him do you mean?

Nice of you to comment on this thread after the race. But here is what we know. 1. I already stated I wouldn't be betting on the event given the state of the track 2. The vast majority of punters are price insensitive, so for them I provided the exacta in one 3. I put up one selection of my own yesterday on a different channel - BEFORE the race. Winner at $14.50 4. I got a PM that you had looked at this thread Saturday morning. Yet you post on everything, but you were too GUTLESS to comment on this thread BEFORE the race 5. You're a FRAUD

My update. Mardigras open TAB open Mardigras upd TAB upd 1 AVILIUS $3.40 $1.60 $3.50 $1.60 3 RED CARDINAL $15.00 $7.00 $11.00 $6.00 5 SOUND $32.00 $101.00 $32.00 $101.00 6 PATRICK ERIN $20.00 $35.00 $18.00 $26.00 8 BIG DUKE $12.00 $12.00 $9.00 $10.00 9 VENTURA STORM $21.00 $71.00 $23.00 $61.00 10 YOGI $15.00 $18.00 $13.00 $18.00 12 BRIMHAM ROCKS $15.00 $31.00 $12.00 $26.00 13 ACE HIGH $13.00 $35.00 $12.00 $31.00 14 RONDINELLA $40.00 $15.00 $34.00 $14.00 15 NETTOYER $16.00 $31.00 $15.00 $26.00 16 DOUKHAN $28.00 $61.00 $22.00 $51.00