mardigras

Had a look at this. Good luck to them. But from looking at it, they seem to follow more of an increasing bet strategy when they lose scenario. Not for me. But good for the interest they create which is a positive.

Thanks Huey. That's what I'd read and it's plainly stupid. Shouldn't even get Listed race funding let alone the bonus amounts.

I may be wrong but I thought they still contributed but not at the level of other races of similar stake. Like a bonus contribution for the good of racing. Haven't looked it up but seem to recall something about this race day.

The letter of the day is B, and the second letter of the day is D, which gives you a few more options

I recently saw some figures on betting provide for Kumara v Matamata on this site. How did things go on Cup day - compared to last year(s). New system and all.

Last I looked, the government gave the racing industry about $150m and seems to continue doing that every year.

I wonder why he feels the need to include the breeding industry. Each can operate without the other.

He writes so much garbage, he has his own interests so far to the forefront, he is seeing this stuff in his head with his own eyes. He's delusional about just how much of a welfare state NZ racing is. NZ are lucky to have what they do, and they should be heeding the advice about working towards standing on its own feet before a serious government tells them it's over.

Once you got a post as bad as yours. And how many times have you gone on about it? Your posts are generally using unnecessary language/imagery. And you mainly get called an idiot/stupid. You are, so that shouldn't come as a shock. And you persist with writing fairytales.

I've nothing negative to say. She hasn't had the greatest opportunities of late so her recent form may look worse than it is. She's bounced back from difficulty in the past. May just need to get some confidence back.

I think you'll find that the mitigating factors are subjective. Therefore her statement might be factual. And it might not. It's an opinion. Your last sentence is also not a fact. Who knew? Clearly not you.

Sure. You're right though that I don't understand that diverting threads, irrelevant pictures etc are all my fault. But you are entitled to your opinion on that. However, could you quote me rather than making a statement claiming something. Just put up any post where I couldn't take criticism of my so called punting value. Thanks. I've provided full details of my methods. Always been happy to. And have always said there isn't only one way. Look forward to my quote supporting your statement. Thanks.

I'm not corrupting anything. One of the purposes of a site like this is to ask questions related to the thread topic, if you haven't seen the answer You just referred to a bunch of rules that require interpretation. Ergo subjective. Subjective assessment can not be described as fact. Ergo, you cannot claim what she wrote is not fact if it is her personal perspective and cannot be factually verified to be wrong. Good luck with that. Yet you've been claiming what she wrote is not factual - in some people's opinion, maybe.

You're the king of fairytales. Easy to see why people don't want you here. How can reading the JCA website help me find the non facts in a post from a jockey. Is the post on the website? I went there and couldn't find it. I'm not coming from any such base, but I do know how to differentiate fact from opinion. Something you can't do.

Looks like she offered a personal perspective then. From what has been stated, it's impossible to say whether it is or isn't factual. Where are the supposed parts that are not factual?

Liar. Never been stated. You don't. And again, it isn't whatever it is you do that has been labelled flawed, it's the blue print that has been labelled flawed. Which it is. Lies, never been stated. The blue print of down in grade is what is flawed. Horses will win that are down in grade, but the blue print of following that is flawed. These are not my rules. These are the rules of the science relating to population statistics. Can you not understand basic English. You're a waste of space. You've put the evidence up that you are a fraud. Case closed.

Thanks for confirming you are a total fraud. I only kept responding to you to get complete evidence of that. Thanks. It's all here Mr Fraud.

Would you like proof of winning over the last 20 years? Not just one day, anyone can do that? Especially you showing one day of wins once, over a nine month period. Not bad. I've provided it before. Can do so again. Only you'll call me arrogant for doing it. But you will still run away with your tail between your legs because you're a loser.

Just more of your usual crap. You've been found out, everyone is on to you Mr Fraud. I don't need to know about what you wrote since none of it is needed to find a selection that matches your very own blueprint. When I've put selections up and asked which ones match the blueprint, never have you answered before the races. NEVER. Mr Fraud. Credibility Zero!

I've used the blue print to put up selections that 100% match it, it clearly can't be used to win for the rest of their lives. Which means either you are a fraud or you've missed key ingredients from the blueprint. Which is it?

You rely on the opinion of others to form an opinion as to the supposed impact. If a horse is blocked for the entire straight at Trentham, what's the adjustment. Can't wait for you to evade the question as usual.

It'll never happen. He is a fraud and a writer of fairytales.

That was on racechat. He was putting up selections pre race - and every one had been a loser. They were all $3 - $5 runners. Zip. After 9 months of putting up losers, he threw some better darts. And got a bunch of multis up (mainly place bets). And tried to claim that as being proof that he knows what he is talking about. At the rate of spend, the $200 would have lasted 10 weeks before the $10k was exhausted. Not the 40 weeks it took for him to show anything. If he was what his fairytale writing claims, he would easily be able to put something up pre-race. And have no impact on any of his bets. Ask him why he hasn't been banned on NZ TAB for being such a winner taking fixed odds bets?

That only took you nine months. Not bad. And the master crap was 4 horses that returned 1 winner at $2 odd and other horses (savers) that managed to restrict the losses. Not bad. I'm sure most punters have had the odd winning day. Even with a dartboard, that would happen.

Pretty difficult to see what the issue is without seeing the post. Storm/teacup spring to mind.