Freda

Well, yeah....plus it rained before Wednesday so that helped. Without the rain they might have got their ears chewed again.

Pffft.

Only speculation here....but, my thoughts are, that given the Canterbury climate with its summer heat and strong winds, the track dries out super-quickly, even after rain. Any irrigation would have been an attempt to keep the level of moisture at an acceptable level given the dressing-down received after earlier footing was deemed unacceptable.

I think it has changed, N.M, I seem to recall noticing that fairly recently...in the last 3 - 4 years anyway. It used be part of the entertainment watching a member of the public [ ex jock usually ] remounting a fallen runner and cantering down to the post. Not too many volunteered when there were still jumps to negotiate though!

Yeah, I get you now. Yes, it should be idiot proof. I could have worked it then. There is, I believe, a manual over-ride but again, I don't know how to trigger that. Too late now, anyway, the horse's racing career is finished , the owner won't invest again, and the rider was lucky to escape with a few bruises.

Exactly...that's why I stood back, I know nothing about the things.

And cameras aside, wtf was wrong with the track for two fatal injuries to happen on the same day? If 'wind-blown irrigation ' had created uneven footing, why was that not noticed earlier? To quote a certain smart commentator ...' bring in the clowns - oh, never mind, they're already here.'

Re -set button. I see now. We had permission to put a problem horse in the [ raceday ] gates following jumpouts. Got her in with a bit of 'discussion' and after she had [ finally ] settled and was standing quietly, it was time to let her pop out. But the starter had ambled off to do something else and was nowhere in sight. What to do? None of us watching had had any practice or knowledge of starting procedures. There was no guarantee the horse would remain calm until the bloke was found. Finally, one watching apprentice jockey volunteered to push the button. Logically, he had been closer to the procedure than any of the rest of us, so seemed the best call at the time. But they didn't open. And the horse, which up to then was having quite a good learning/confidence experience, hit the gates, and went absolutely berserk. Lucky she and/or her rider weren't killed.

Bloody pen pushers.

Whoever is to blame, it is a disgraceful situation and could have serious consequences in the event of human injury - or worse.

Yeah, agree there. If saving ground was the idea, why not have the rail out a bit for the first day, in to allow fresh ground the second day, then right in to allow more fresh ground against the rail. Seems to me to be going the wrong way...but there may be a good reason that I can't think of.

Cameron certainly didn't.

Yes, I realise it is a tropical or subtropical species. But Tokyo would have periods of cold, so, maybe a specific cultivar that can cope?

Plushenko strode home impressively along the fence.....just saying...

It was impressive in its maiden win, so, yeah, I guess it has.

To be absolutely fair, the kikuyu-type grass with its spreading root system [ a bit like twitch, I was told ] used in Qld is very different from the rye grass cultivars in use here. Just try and get rid of twitch from your garden, origin under the neighbour's fence, and you will get the point. I believe a similar type is also used in Tokyo, certainly in the Horlicks time, the grass looked discoloured and unattractive, but apparently still offered resilient cushion.

'....new synthetic training track, overhaul of grass training track...reconstruction of course proper ...' If only...and no mention of wiping out provincial clubs and tracks to facilitate this? heavens above..

Have to agree with both Pitty and Reefton about the watering producing uneven and biased track surfaces. But, without having any pretensions to expertise in this matter - apart from years of observation - there are vast differences in the surfaces we are offered for racing. A fast track at Reefton is very different from the same at Riccarton, a fact that seems to escape many. The soil structure at many tracks (as alluded to by the Chief who does have knowledge in these matters) is stuffed, and therefore there is little that beleaguered track managers can do in these situations. Riccarton has such an unforgiving substructure that it is unacceptable to offer in unwatered state when firm - yet that watering creates a raft of problems. As Curious has pointed out, years of underinvestment has produced this situation that is going to be hugely costly to sort out. As an aside - love your filly, Reefton, she looks to have a bright future.

Yeah, very unlucky, I thought she could do well. Smart.

Yes, I think that cost could be acceptable.

For Riccarton, yeah, I reckon so. Probably better than that now though.

I don't disagree in principle...but how many of the smaller players can/could afford that? Many are just hanging on by the skin of their teeth as it is.

Yes, a concern of mine too. And there is no stopping the relentless trend.

Cheaper refreshments too! Enthusiasts such as yourself are keeping us all going, and are, I fear, likely to be adversely impacted by the 'new' face of the industry.

At least the Met. has taken notice of the consistent fk-ups at the start and has replaced the starter...their call, not the RIU though. What a conflict of interest - racecourse D, RIU employee, starter...bloody hell, I'm not implying corruption here, but systems must be seen to be beyond any taint.